The relationships between acetylcholine-induced chest pain, objective measures of coronary vascular function and symptom status

被引:3
作者
Miner, Steven E. S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
McCarthy, Mary C. [1 ]
Ardern, Chris I. [2 ]
Perry, Chris G. R. [2 ]
Toleva, Olga [4 ]
Nield, Lynne E. [3 ]
Manlhiot, Cedric [5 ]
Cantor, Warren J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southlake Reg Hlth Ctr, Div Cardiol, Newmarket, ON, Canada
[2] York Univ, Muscle Hlth Res Ctr, Sch Kinesiol & Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Cardiol, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pediat, Blalock Taussig Thomas Congenital Heart Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
stable angina; fractional flow reserve; microvascular angina; microvascular dysfunction; coronary endothelial dysfunction; vasospastic angina; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION; MICROVASCULAR DYSFUNCTION; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; VASOSPASTIC ANGINA; PROGNOSTIC VALUE; BLOOD-FLOW; INHIBITION; METABOLISM; EFFICIENCY; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.3389/fcvm.2023.1217731
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acetylcholine-induced chest pain is routinely measured during the assessment of microvascular function. Aims: The aim was to determine the relationships between acetylcholine-induced chest pain and both symptom burden and objective measures of vascular function. Methods: In patients with angina but no obstructive coronary artery disease, invasive studies determined the presence or absence of chest pain during both acetylcholine and adenosine infusion. Thermodilution-derived coronary blood flow (CBF) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR) was determined at rest and during both acetylcholine and adenosine infusion. Patients with epicardial spasm (>90%) were excluded; vasoconstriction between 20% and 90% was considered endothelial dysfunction. Results: Eighty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these 52 patients (60%) experienced chest pain during acetylcholine while 35 (40%) did not. Those with acetylcholine-induced chest pain demonstrated: (1) Increased CBF at rest (1.6 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.2 +/- 0.4, p = 0.004) (2) Decreased IMR with acetylcholine (acetylcholine-IMR = 29.7 +/- 16.3 vs. 40.4 +/- 17.1, p = 0.004), (3) Equivalent IMR following adenosine (Adenosine-IMR: 21.1 +/- 10.7 vs. 21.8 +/- 8.2, p = 0.76), (4) Increased adenosine-induced chest pain (40/52 = 77% vs. 7/35 = 20%, p < 0.0001), (5) Increased chest pain during exercise testing (30/46 = 63% vs. 4/29 = 12%, p < 0.00001) with no differences in exercise duration or electrocardiographic changes, and (6) Increased prevalence of epicardial endothelial dysfunction (33/52 = 63% vs. 14/35 = 40%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: After excluding epicardial spasm, acetylcholine-induced chest pain is associated with increased pain during exercise and adenosine infusion, increased coronary blood flow at rest, decreased microvascular resistance in response to acetylcholine and increased prevalence of epicardial endothelial dysfunction. These findings raise questions about the mechanisms underlying acetylcholine-induced chest pain.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Myocardial resistance assessed by guidewire-based pressure-temperature measurement: In vitro validation [J].
Aarnoudse, W ;
van den Berg, P ;
van de Vosse, F ;
Geven, M ;
Rutten, M ;
van Turnhout, M ;
Fearon, W ;
De Bruyne, B ;
Pijls, N .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 62 (01) :56-63
[2]   International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina [J].
Beltrame, John F. ;
Crea, Filippo ;
Kaski, Juan Carlos ;
Ogawa, Hisao ;
Ong, Peter ;
Sechtem, Udo ;
Shimokawa, Hiroaki ;
Merz, C. Noel Bairey .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2017, 38 (33) :2565-2568
[3]   Myocardial glucose and lactate metabolism during rest and atrial pacing in humans [J].
Bergman, Bryan C. ;
Tsvetkova, Tatiana ;
Lowes, Brian ;
Wolfel, Eugene E. .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 2009, 587 (09) :2087-2099
[4]  
Biondi MJ, 2021, CIRCULATION, V144
[5]   Prognostic significance of myocardial energy expenditure and myocardial efficiency in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction [J].
Cetin, Mehmet S. ;
Cetin, Elif H. Ozcan ;
Canpolat, Ugur ;
Sasmaz, Hatice ;
Temizhan, Ahmet ;
Aydogdu, Sinan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 34 (02) :211-222
[6]   Development and Validation of a Short Version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire [J].
Chan, Paul S. ;
Jones, Philip G. ;
Arnold, Suzanne A. ;
Spertus, John A. .
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2014, 7 (05) :640-647
[7]   MICROVASCULAR PRESSURES AND RESISTANCES IN THE LEFT-VENTRICULAR SUBEPICARDIUM AND SUBENDOCARDIUM [J].
CHILIAN, WM .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1991, 69 (03) :561-570
[8]   Treatment of microvascular angina: the need for precision medicine [J].
Crea, Filippo ;
Lanza, Gaetano Antonio .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (19) :1514-1516
[9]   Coronary microvascular dysfunction: an update [J].
Crea, Filippo ;
Camici, Paolo G. ;
Merz, Cathleen Noel Bairey .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2014, 35 (17) :1101-+
[10]   Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve - Experimental validation [J].
De Bruyne, B ;
Pijls, NHJ ;
Smith, L ;
Wievegg, M ;
Heyndrickx, GR .
CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) :2003-2006