The Global Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: A Systematic Review

被引:18
作者
Varma, Jonny R. [1 ]
Fernando, Sherwin [1 ]
Ting, Brian Y. [1 ]
Aamir, Shahrukh [1 ]
Sivaprakasam, Rajesh [2 ]
机构
[1] Barts & London Queen Marys Sch Med & Dent, Undergrad Med Educ, London, England
[2] Royal London Hosp, Renal Transplant, London, England
关键词
systematic review; undergraduate medical education; medical students; education; artificial intelligence; medical education; NEURAL-NETWORK; EDUCATION; SKILLS;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.39701
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a rapidly advancing technology that has the potential to revolutionize medical education. AI can provide personalized learning experiences, assist with student assessment, and aid in the integration of pre-clinical and clinical curricula. Despite the potential benefits, there is a paucity of literature investigating the use of AI in undergraduate medical education. This study aims to evaluate the role of AI in undergraduate medical curricula worldwide and compare AI to current teaching and assessment methods. This systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Texts unavailable in English were excluded alongside those not focused on medical students alone or with little mention of AI. The key search terms were "undergraduate medical education," "medical students," "medical education," and "artificial intelligence." The methodological rigor of each study was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI). A total of 36 articles were screened from 700 initial articles, of which 11 were deemed eligible. These were categorized into the following three domains: teaching (n = 6), assessing (n = 3), and trend spotting (n = 2). AI was shown to be highly accurate in studies that directly tested its ability. The mean overall MERSQI score for all selected papers was 10.5 (standard deviation = 2.3; range = 6 to 15.5) falling below the expected score of 10.7 due to notable weaknesses in study design, sampling methods, and study outcomes. AI performance was synergized with human involvement suggesting that AI would be best employed as a supplement to undergraduate medical curricula. Studies directly comparing AI to current teaching methods demonstrated favorable performance. While shown to have a promising role, there remains a limited number of studies in the field, and further research is needed to refine and establish clear foundations to assist in its development.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Beck J., 1996, Crossroads, V3, P11, DOI DOI 10.1145/332148.332153
[2]  
Bills Corey B, 2016, J Grad Med Educ, V8, P685, DOI [10.4300/jgme-d-15-00774.1, 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00774.1]
[3]   Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum [J].
Bric, Justin ;
Connolly, Michael ;
Kastenmeier, Andrew ;
Goldblatt, Matthew ;
Gould, Jon C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (12) :3343-3348
[4]  
Chan Kai Siang, 2019, JMIR Med Educ, V5, pe13930, DOI [10.2196/13930, 10.2196/13930]
[5]  
Chen Yukun, 2014, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2014, P375
[6]   Information-gathering patterns associated with higher rates of diagnostic error [J].
Delzell, John E., Jr. ;
Chumley, Heidi ;
Webb, Russell ;
Chakrabarti, Swapan ;
Relan, Anju .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 14 (05) :697-711
[7]  
Gaur Uma, 2020, SN Compr Clin Med, V2, P1992, DOI [10.1007/s42399-020-00528-1, 10.1007/s42399-020-00528-1]
[8]   Use of Verbot™ technology to enhance classroom lecture [J].
Gorby, GL .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2001, 76 (05) :552-553
[9]   Global health partnership for student peer-to-peer psychiatry e-learning: Lessons learned [J].
Keynejad, Roxanne C. .
GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2016, 12
[10]  
Khumrin Piyapong, 2018, AMIA Annu Symp Proc, V2018, P1348