A Heterogeneous Sampling Strategy to Model Earthquake-Triggered Landslides

被引:1
作者
Yang, Hui [1 ]
Shi, Peijun [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Quincey, Duncan [6 ]
Qi, Wenwen [7 ]
Yang, Wentao [1 ,6 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Acad Disaster Reduct & Emergency Management, Minist Emergency Management, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Minist Educ, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Leeds, Sch Geog, Leeds LS2 9JT, England
[7] Natl Inst Nat Hazards, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[8] Acad Plateau Sci & Sustainabil, Peoples Govt Qinghai Prov, Xining 810016, Peoples R China
[9] Beijing Normal Univ, Xining 810016, Peoples R China
关键词
Earthquake-triggered landslides; Landslide hazard modeling; Machine learning; Model validation; Sampling strategy; Tibetan Plateau; REAL-TIME PREDICTION; WENCHUAN EARTHQUAKE; RANDOM FOREST; SUSCEPTIBILITY; HAZARD;
D O I
10.1007/s13753-023-00489-8
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Regional modeling of landslide hazards is an essential tool for the assessment and management of risk in mountain environments. Previous studies that have focused on modeling earthquake-triggered landslides report high prediction accuracies. However, it is common to use a validation strategy with an equal number of landslide and non-landslide samples, scattered homogeneously across the study area. Consequently, there are overestimations in the epicenter area, and the spatial pattern of modeled locations does not agree well with real events. In order to improve landslide hazard mapping, we proposed a spatially heterogeneous non-landslide sampling strategy by considering local ratios of landslide to non-landslide area. Coseismic landslides triggered by the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake on the eastern Tibetan Plateau were used as an example. To assess the performance of the new strategy, we trained two random forest models that shared the same hyperparameters. The first was trained using samples from the new heterogeneous strategy, and the second used the traditional approach. In each case the spatial match between modeled and measured (interpreted) landslides was examined by scatterplot, with a 2 km-by-2 km fishnet. Although the traditional approach achieved higher AUC(ROC) (0.95) accuracy than the proposed one (0.85), the coefficient of determination (R-2) for the new strategy (0.88) was much higher than for the traditional strategy (0.55). Our results indicate that the proposed strategy outperforms the traditional one when comparing against landslide inventory data. Our work demonstrates that higher prediction accuracies in landslide hazard modeling may be deceptive, and validation of the modeled spatial pattern should be prioritized. The proposed method may also be used to improve the mapping of precipitation-induced landslides. Application of the proposed strategy could benefit precise assessment of landslide risks in mountain environments.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 648
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Improving Near-Real-Time Coseismic Landslide Models: Lessons Learned from the 2016 Kaikoura, New Zealand, Earthquake
    Allstadt, Kate E.
    Jibson, Randall W.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    Massey, Chris I.
    Wald, David J.
    Godt, Jonathan W.
    Rengers, Francis K.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 108 (3B) : 1649 - 1664
  • [2] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [3] Cao Z., 2014, Study on Optimization of Random Forests Algorithm
  • [4] Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues
    Catani, F.
    Lagomarsino, D.
    Segoni, S.
    Tofani, V.
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2013, 13 (11) : 2815 - 2831
  • [5] Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naive Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling
    Chen, Wei
    Zhang, Shuai
    Li, Renwei
    Shahabi, Himan
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 644 : 1006 - 1018
  • [6] Random Forests for Landslide Prediction in Tsengwen River Watershed, Central Taiwan
    Cheng, Youg-Sin
    Yu, Teng-To
    Nguyen-Thanh Son
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (02) : 1 - 11
  • [7] Destruction of vegetation due to geo-hazards and its environmental impacts in the Wenchuan earthquake areas
    Cui, Peng
    Lin, Yong-ming
    Chen, Can
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 44 : 61 - 69
  • [8] Comparing the prediction performance of a Deep Learning Neural Network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment
    Dieu Tien Bui
    Tsangaratos, Paraskevas
    Viet-Tien Nguyen
    Ngo Van Liem
    Phan Trong Trinh
    [J]. CATENA, 2020, 188
  • [9] Emberson R, 2016, NAT GEOSCI, V9, P42, DOI [10.1038/ngeo2600, 10.1038/NGEO2600]
  • [10] Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk-zoning for land use planning
    Fell, Robin
    Cororninas, Jordi
    Bonnard, Christophe
    Cascini, Leonardo
    Leroi, Eric
    Savage, William Z.
    [J]. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2008, 102 (3-4) : 85 - 98