Revision Rate of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Is it Truly a Single-Stage Reconstruction? A Single-Surgeon Experience

被引:2
作者
Adler, Neta [1 ]
Carmon, Einat [2 ]
Houri, Pnina [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hadassah Hebrew Univ, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Med Ctr, Jerusalem, Israel
[2] Asuta Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Ashdod, Israel
关键词
Breast Reconstruction; Direct to implant; Expander; Single stage; ACELLULAR DERMAL MATRIX;
D O I
10.1007/s00266-022-03136-7
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction There has been increased interest in direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction in recent years. The goal of this study was to focus on the re-operation rate of DTI in comparison with two-stage tissue expander (TE) reconstruction. Patients and Methods In total, 165 consecutive patients (222 breasts) underwent skin sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based reconstruction between January 2010 and December 2019. Patients were divided to TE procedure and DTI (42,180 breasts, respectively). Data collected included demographics, operative details and oncological medical treatment, complications classified according to Clavien-Dindo, capsular contracture Baker 3-4 and re-operation due to complication or due to patient's wish to improve aesthetic appearance. Results There were significantly more prophylactic mastectomies and BRCA gene mutation in the DTI breast reconstruction group, and more smokers and diabetic patients in the TE group. No significant difference was found in the complication rates between the groups (DTI-26.1%, TE-40.5%). However, major complication and re-operation rate due to complications were significantly different ( DTI-16.7% and 10.6%, TE-26.2% and 31%, respectively, p= 0.035, p = 0.008). No significant differences were found in Clavien-Dindo stages between the groups except for Grade 3b. Re-operation due to desire for aesthetic improvement was significantly higher in the TE group (DTI-38%. TE-69%, p=0.0003). Conclusion DTI immediate breast reconstruction can provide a good alternative to the traditional two-stage TE/implant operation. Both patients and surgeons can be reassured that the majority of the cases are one-stage reconstruction. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1712
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Outcomes following Direct-to-Implant versus Conventional Two-Stage Implant Reconstruction
    Basta, Marten N.
    Gerety, Patrick A.
    Serletti, Joseph M.
    Kovach, Stephen J.
    Fischer, John P.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2015, 136 (06) : 1135 - 1144
  • [2] Comparison of one-stage direct-to-implant with acellular dermal matrix and two-stage immediate implant-based breast reconstruction-a cohort study
    Brunbjerg, Mette Eline
    Jensen, Thomas Bo
    Overgaard, Jens
    Christiansen, Peer
    Damsgaard, Tine Engberg
    [J]. GLAND SURGERY, 2021, 10 (01) : 207 - 218
  • [3] Comparative study of patient outcomes between direct to implant and two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction after mastectomy
    Caputo, Glenda Giorgia
    Vigato, Enrico
    Cordaro, Emanuele Rampino
    Parodi, Pier Camillo
    Governa, Maurizio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2021, 74 (10) : 2573 - 2579
  • [4] Two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction compared with immediate one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction augmented with an acellular dermal matrix: an open-label, phase 4, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial
    Dikmans, Rieky E. G.
    Negenborn, Vera L.
    Bouman, Mark-Bram
    Winters, Hay A. H.
    Twisk, Jos W. R.
    Ruhe, P. Quinten
    Mureau, Marc A. M.
    Smit, Jan Maerten
    Tuinder, Stefania
    Eltahir, Yassir
    Posch, Nicole A.
    van Steveninck-Barends, Josephina M.
    Meesters-Caberg, Marleen A.
    van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J.
    Ritt, Marco J. P. F.
    Mullender, Margriet G.
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (02) : 251 - 258
  • [5] Outcomes and quality of life in immediate one-stage versus two-stage breast reconstructions without an acellular dermal matrix: 17-years of experience
    Dimovska, Eleonora O. F.
    Chen, Courtney
    Chou, Hsu-Huan
    Lin, Yi-Ling
    Cheng, Ming-Huei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 124 (04) : 510 - 520
  • [6] Biological Matrix-Assisted One-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Versus Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications
    Gao, Peng
    Bai, Ping
    Ren, Yinpeng
    Kong, Xiangyi
    Wang, Zhongzhao
    Fang, Yi
    Wang, Jing
    [J]. AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY, 2021, 45 (06) : 2581 - 2590
  • [7] Innocenti Alessandro, 2021, Acta Biomed, V92, pe2021228, DOI 10.23750/abm.v92i3.9916
  • [8] Analyzing Regional Differences over a 15-Year Trend of One-Stage versus Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction in 941,191 Postmastectomy Patients
    Kamali, Parisa
    Koolen, Pieter G. L.
    Ibrahim, Ahmed M. S.
    Paul, Marek A.
    Dikmans, Rieky E.
    Schermerhorn, Marc L.
    Lee, Bernard T.
    Lin, Samuel J.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (01) : 1E - 14E
  • [9] Is Single-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Cost Effective? A Cost-Utility Analysis for the Use of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Relative to Expander-Implant Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients
    Krishnan, Naveen M.
    Fischer, John P.
    Basta, Marten N.
    Nahabedian, Maurice Y.
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2016, 138 (03) : 537 - 547
  • [10] Current Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction
    Panchal, Hina
    Matros, Evan
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 140 (05) : 7S - 13S