A systematic review of the evaluation of agricultural policies: Using prisma

被引:9
作者
Bastidas-Orrego, Lina M. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Jaramillo, Natalia [2 ,5 ]
Castillo-Grisales, Julian A. [3 ]
Ceballos, Yony F. [4 ]
机构
[1] Corp Univ Remington, Capital Contable Res Grp, Medellin, Colombia
[2] Fdn Univ Maria Cano, Fac Ciencias Empresariales, SUMAR Res Grp, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Univ Antioquia, Fac Ingn, Ingn & Soc Res Grp, Medellin, Colombia
[4] Univ Antioquia, Fac Ingenenieria, Ingn & Tecnol Org Soc ITOS Res Grp, Medellin, Colombia
[5] Univ Nacl Colombia, Escuela Fis, Grp Ceram & Vitreos, Calle 59A 63-20, Medellin 050034, Colombia
[6] Corp Univ Remington, Fac Ciencias Empresariales Res Grp, Mundo Org, Medellin, Colombia
[7] Corp Univ Remington, Carrera 51 49-59, Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia
关键词
Policy evaluation; Agricultural policies; Systematic review; Variables of agricultural policy; Types of agricultural policies; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20292
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: The food security of each country depends on agricultural development, which is sensitive to the implementation of agricultural public policies. These must evolve as new ruralities arise, with new phenomena, such as climate change, ecosystem services, changes in consumer preferences, globalization, sustainability and ecological awareness. Hence, of ex-ante and ex-post evaluations of agricultural policies, are important because they provide timely information to government entities. There are different methodologies for policy evaluation, which have evolved over time. Aims: This systematic review aims to identify manuscript that systematically review methodologies, policies and variables evaluated during the last 50 years to determine whether a policy has been efficient. To assess the quality of the included manuscript and to describe the measures and domains identified.Methods: EBSCO, Dialnet, SciELO, Scopus, Science Direct, Dimensions and Web of Science were searched. A total of 154 manuscript were identified, the review was finalized by reviewing the title, and abstract and the review was finalized by reviewing the title, abstract and full text, resolving disagreements. Of these 154 manuscripts, 37 met the criteria and were included in the analysis. PRISMA checklists were used to evaluate the methodology. Outcomes and results: It were found that there are few studies on the design of evaluation methodologies for agricultural policies in the literature. Research shows that the latest policy evaluation proposals present more complex methodologies involving tools such as machine learning and agent-based modelling (ABM). On the other hand, the issue of sustainability as a policy is seen in the agri-environmental policy evaluation.Conclusions and implications: The evolution of agricultural policy methodologies can be observed at the beginning with the use of quantitative methodologies, such as matrices, statistics and econometrics. With the emergence of new variables, such as agrienvironmental variables, citizen
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Discrimination based on political beliefs: A field experiment on the freedom of assembly [J].
Adam, Christian ;
Grohs, Stephan ;
Knill, Christoph .
PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, 2022, 37 (03) :261-282
[2]   Farm size, relative efficiency and agrarian policy in Cote d'Ivoire: Profit function analysis of rice farms [J].
Adesina, AA ;
Djato, KK .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 14 (02) :93-102
[3]   Monetary and fiscal policies' effect on agricultural growth: GMM estimation and simulation analysis [J].
Akbar, Muhammad ;
Jamil, Faisal .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2012, 29 (05) :1909-1920
[4]  
Amuda Y. J., 2022, International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), V13, P1
[5]  
Anderson R., 1985, Empir. Econ., V10, P65, DOI [10.1007/BF01973542, DOI 10.1007/BF01973542]
[6]   Integrating environmental considerations in the agricultural policy process: Evidence from Nigeria [J].
Babu, Suresh Chandra ;
Mavrotas, George ;
Prasai, Nilam .
ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 25 :111-125
[7]   A STOCHASTIC RECURSIVE INTERACTIVE PROGRAMMING-MODEL FOR FARM FIRM POLICY ANALYSIS [J].
BAUM, K ;
RICHARDSON, J ;
SCHERTZ, L .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1984, 11 (02) :199-222
[8]   Measuring the Trade Restrictiveness of Domestic Support using the EU Common Agricultural Policy as an Example [J].
Boysen-Urban, Kirsten ;
Brockmeier, Martina ;
Jensen, Hans G. ;
Boysen, Ole .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 71 (01) :27-49
[9]   MACROECONOMIC MODEL FOR AGRICULTURAL SECTOR ANALYSIS [J].
BYERLEE, D ;
HALTER, AN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1974, 56 (03) :520-533
[10]   Economic Experiments as a Tool for Agricultural Policy Evaluation: Insights from the European CAP [J].
Colen, Liesbeth ;
Gomez y Paloma, Sergio ;
Latacz-Lohmann, Uwe ;
Lefebvre, Marianne ;
Preget, Raphaele ;
Thoyer, Sophie .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE, 2016, 64 (04) :667-694