Range reshuffling: Climate change, invasive species, and the case of Nothofagus forests in Aotearoa New Zealand

被引:4
作者
Mathias, Shar [1 ]
van Galen, Laura G. [1 ,2 ]
Jarvie, Scott [3 ]
Larcombe, Matthew J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Bot, Dunedin, New Zealand
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Dept Environm Syst Sci, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Otago Reg Council, Sci Team, Dunedin, New Zealand
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Bot, POB 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
关键词
bioclimatic niche modelling; Climate change; forest distributions; invasive species; migration; Nothofagaceae; Pinaceae; range reshuffling; species distribution modelling (SDM); DISTRIBUTION MODELS; DISCONTINUOUS DISTRIBUTION; FLORISTIC DISTRIBUTION; PSEUDOTSUGA-MENZIESII; VEGETATION COVER; GLACIAL CLIMATES; SOUTH ISLAND; ADAPTATION; PREDICTION; RESPONSES;
D O I
10.1111/ddi.13767
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim: The impact of climate change on forest biodiversity and ecosystem services will be partly determined by the relative fortunes of invasive and native forest trees under future conditions. Aotearoa New Zealand has high conservation value native forests and one of the world's worst invasive tree problems. We assess the relative effects of habitat redistribution on native Nothofagus and invasive conifer (Pinaceae) species in New Zealand as a case study on the compounding impacts of climate change and tree invasions.Location: Aotearoa New Zealand.Methods: We use species distribution models (SDMs) to predict the current and future distribution of habitat for five native Nothofagus species and 13 invasive conifer species under two 2070 climate scenarios. We calculate habitat loss/gain for all species and examine overlap between the invasive and native species now and in future.Results: Most species will lose habitat overall. The native species saw large changes in the distribution of habitat with extensive losses in North Island and gains mostly in South Island. Concerningly, we found that most new habitat for Nothofagus was also suitable for at least one invasive species. However, there were refugia for the native species in the wetter parts of the climate space.Main Conclusion: If the predicted changes in habitat distribution translate to shifts in forest distribution, it would cause widespread ecological disruption. We discuss how acclimation, adaptation and biotic interactions may prevent/delay some changes. But we also highlight that the poor establishment capacity of Nothofagus, and the contrasting ability of the conifers to invade, will present persistent conservation challenges in areas of both new habitat and forest retreat. Pinaceae are problematic invaders globally, and our results highlight that control of invasions and active native forest restoration will likely be key to managing forest biodiversity under future climates.
引用
收藏
页码:1402 / 1419
页数:18
相关论文
共 123 条
  • [1] Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Yeaman, Sam
    Holliday, Jason A.
    Wang, Tongli
    Curtis-McLane, Sierra
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS, 2008, 1 (01): : 95 - 111
  • [2] Potential for evolutionary responses to climate change evidence from tree populations
    Alberto, Florian J.
    Aitken, Sally N.
    Alia, Ricardo
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Santiago C.
    Hanninen, Heikki
    Kremer, Antoine
    Lefevre, Francois
    Lenormand, Thomas
    Yeaman, Sam
    Whetten, Ross
    Savolainen, Outi
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2013, 19 (06) : 1645 - 1661
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1980, New Zealand Journal of Ecology
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1991, Vegetation of New Zealand
  • [5] Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modeling
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    Townsend Peterson, A.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2012, 93 (07) : 1527 - 1539
  • [6] Adaptation from standing genetic variation
    Barrett, Rowan D. H.
    Schluter, Dolph
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (01) : 38 - 44
  • [7] Baumgartner J, 2022, RMAXENT TOOLS WORKIN
  • [8] Identifying climate thresholds for dominant natural vegetation types at the global scale using machine learning: Average climate versus extremes
    Beigaite, Rita
    Tang, Hui
    Bryn, Anders
    Skarpaas, Olav
    Stordal, Frode
    Bjerke, Jarle W.
    Zliobaite, Indre
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2022, 28 (11) : 3557 - 3579
  • [9] Benito B M., 2021, spatialRF: easy spatial regression with random forest
  • [10] Disregarding the edaphic dimension in species distribution models leads to the omission of crucial spatial information under climate change: the case of Quercus pubescens in France
    Bertrand, Romain
    Perez, Vincent
    Gegout, Jean-Claude
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2012, 18 (08) : 2648 - 2660