The Impact of Sedative Choice on Intracranial and Systemic Physiology in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review

被引:10
作者
Jeffcote, Toby [1 ,5 ]
Weir, Timothy [1 ]
Anstey, James [3 ]
Mcnamara, Robert [6 ]
Bellomo, Rinaldo [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Udy, Andrew [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Alfred Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, South Yarra, Australia
[2] Austin Hosp, Dept Intens Care Med, Heidelberg, Australia
[3] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Melbourne, England
[4] Univ Melbourne, Dept Crit Care, Parkville, England
[5] Monash Univ, Australian & New Zealand Intens Care Res Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Prahran, Vic, Spain
[6] Royal Perth Hosp, Dept Intens Care, Perth, WA, Australia
关键词
traumatic brain injury; sedation; intracranial pressure; neurocritical care; SEVERE HEAD-INJURY; CEREBRAL PERFUSION-PRESSURE; CRITICALLY-ILL PATIENTS; INTENSIVE-CARE; BLOOD-FLOW; PROPOFOL; SUFENTANIL; MIDAZOLAM; FENTANYL; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1097/ANA.0000000000000836
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Although sedative use is near-ubiquitous in the acute management of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (m-sTBI), the evidence base for these agents is undefined. This review summarizes the evidence for analgosedative agent use in the intensive care unit management of m-sTBI. Clinical studies of sedative and analgosedative agents currently utilized in adult m-sTBI management (propofol, ketamine, benzodiazepines, opioids, and alpha-2 agonists) were identified and assessed for relevance and methodological quality. The primary outcome was the effect of the analgosedative agent on intracranial pressure (ICP). Secondary outcomes included intracranial hemodynamic and metabolic parameters, systemic hemodynamic parameters, measures of therapeutic intensity, and clinical outcomes. Of 594 articles identified, 61 met methodological review criteria, and 40 were included in the qualitative summary; of these, 33 were prospective studies, 18 were randomized controlled trials, and 8 were blinded. There was consistent evidence for the efficacy of sedative agents in the management of m-sTBI and raised ICP, but the overall quality of the evidence was poor, consisting of small studies (median sample size, 23.5) of variable methodological quality. Propofol and midazolam achieve the goals of sedation without notable differences in efficacy or safety, although high-dose propofol may disrupt cerebral autoregulation. Dexmedetomidine and propofol/ dexmedetomidine combination may cause clinically significant hypotension. Dexmedetomidine was effective to achieve a target sedation score. De novo opioid boluses were associated with increased ICP and reduced cerebral perfusion pressure. Ketamine bolus and infusions were not associated with increased ICP and may reduce the incidence of cortical spreading depolarization events. In conclusion, there is a paucity of high-quality evidence to inform the optimal use of analgosedative agents in the management of m-sTBI, inferring significant scope for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:9
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] Ketamine decreases intracranial pressure and electroencephalographic activity in traumatic brain injury patients during propofol sedation
    Albanese, J
    Arnaud, S
    Rey, M
    Thomachot, L
    Alliez, B
    Martin, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 87 (06) : 1328 - 1334
  • [2] SUFENTANIL INCREASES INTRACRANIAL-PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH HEAD TRAUMA
    ALBANESE, J
    DURBEC, O
    VIVIAND, X
    POTIE, F
    ALLIEZ, B
    MARTIN, C
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (03) : 493 - 497
  • [3] Sufentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil in head trauma patients:: A study on cerebral hemodynamics
    Albanèse, J
    Viviand, X
    Potie, F
    Rey, M
    Alliez, B
    Martin, C
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (02) : 407 - 411
  • [4] Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury
    Balestreri, Marcella
    Czosnyka, Marek
    Hutchinson, Peter
    Steiner, Luzius A.
    Hiler, Magda
    Smielewski, Piotr
    Pickard, John D.
    [J]. NEUROCRITICAL CARE, 2006, 4 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [5] Benyo Z, 1996, CEREBROVAS BRAIN MET, V8, P326
  • [6] Effects of sufentanil or ketamine administered in target-controlled infusion on the cerebral hemodynamics of severely brain-injured patients
    Bourgoin, A
    Albanèse, J
    Léone, M
    Sampol-Manos, E
    Viviand, X
    Martin, C
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (05) : 1109 - 1113
  • [7] Safety of sedation with ketamine in severe head injury patients:: Comparison with sufentanil
    Bourgoin, A
    Albanèse, J
    Wereszczynski, N
    Charbit, M
    Vialet, R
    Martin, C
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (03) : 711 - 717
  • [8] Burry L., 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V4, pCD012639, DOI [10.1002/14651858.Cd012639, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD012639]
  • [9] Midazolam and 2% propofol in long-term sedation of traumatized, critically ill patients: Efficacy and safety comparison
    Camps, AS
    Riera, JASI
    Vazquez, DT
    Borges, MS
    Rodriguez, JP
    Lopez, EA
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (11) : 3612 - 3619
  • [10] Racemic ketamine in adult head injury patients: use in endotracheal suctioning
    Caricato, Anselmo
    Tersali, Alessandra
    Pitoni, Sara
    De Waure, Chiara
    Sandroni, Claudio
    Bocci, Maria Grazia
    Annetta, Maria Giuseppina
    Pennisi, Mariano Alberto
    Antonelli, Massimo
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2013, 17 (06):