Children's and Caregivers' Review of a Guided Imagery Therapy Mobile App Designed to Treat Children With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders: Leveraging a Mixed Methods Approach With User-Centered Design

被引:3
作者
Hollier, John M. [1 ,2 ,9 ]
Strickland, Tianta A.
Fordis, Michael [3 ]
van Tilburg, Miranda A. L. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Shulman, Robert J. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Thompson, Debbe [2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Texas Childrens Hosp, Houston, TX USA
[2] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Houston, TX USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Ctr Collaborat & Interact Technol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Marshall Univ, Dept Internal Med, Huntington, WV USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Social Work, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ North Carolina, Dept Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[7] Cape Fear Valley Hosp, Grad Med Educ, Fayetteville, NC USA
[8] ARS, USDA, Childrens Nutr Res Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[9] Texas Childrens Hosp, 6701 Fannin St,Suite 1010, Houston, TX 77030 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
guided imagery therapy; guided imagery; psychotherapy; disorders of gut-brain interaction; functional abdominal pain disorders; pediatric; pain; mobile app; mobile health; mHealth; mixed methods research; usability; gamification; user-centered design; guided image therapy; app prototype; prototype; feedback; children; child; youths; caregiver; mobile phone; IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; HYPNOTHERAPY; QUALITY;
D O I
10.2196/41321
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are highly prevalent and associated with substantial morbidity. Guided imagery therapy (GIT) is efficacious; however, barriers often impede patient access. Therefore, we developed a GIT mobile app as a novel delivery platform.Objective: Guided by user-centered design, this study captured the critiques of our GIT app from children with FAPDs and their caregivers.Methods: Children aged 7 to 12 years with Rome IV-defined FAPDs and their caregivers were enrolled. The participants completed a software evaluation, which assessed how well they executed specific app tasks: opening the app, logging in, initiating a session, setting the reminder notification time, and exiting the app. Difficulties in completing these tasks were tallied. After this evaluation, the participants independently completed a System Usability Scale survey. Finally, the children and caregivers were separately interviewed to capture their thoughts about the app. Using a hybrid thematic analysis approach, 2 independent coders coded the interview transcripts using a shared codebook. Data integration occurred after the qualitative and quantitative data were analyzed, and the collective results were summarized. Results: We enrolled 16 child-caregiver dyads. The average age of the children was 9.0 (SD 1.6) years, and 69% (11/16) were female. The System Usability Scale average scores were above average at 78.2 (SD 12.6) and 78.0 (SD 13.5) for the children and caregivers, respectively. The software evaluation revealed favorable usability for most tasks, but 75% (12/16) of children and 69% (11/16) of caregivers had difficulty setting the reminder notification. The children's interviews confirmed the app's usability as favorable but noted difficulty in locating the reminder notification. The children recommended adding exciting scenery and animations to the session screen. Their preferred topics were animals, beaches, swimming, and forests. They also recommended adding soft sounds related to the session topic. Finally, they suggested that adding app gamification enhancements using tangible and intangible rewards for listening to the sessions would promote regular use. The caregivers also assessed the app's usability as favorable but verified the difficulty in locating the reminder notification. They preferred a beach setting, and theme-related music and nature sounds were recommended to augment the session narration. App interface suggestions included increasing the font and image sizes. They also thought that the app's ability to relieve gastrointestinal symptoms and gamification enhancements using tangible and intangible incentives would positively influence the children's motivation to use the app regularly. Data integration revealed that the GIT app had above-average usability. Usability challenges included locating the reminder notification feature and esthetics affecting navigation.Conclusions: Children and caregivers rated our GIT app's usability favorably, offered suggestions to improve its appearance and session content, and recommended rewards to promote its regular use. Their feedback will inform future app refinements.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Text Messaging and Mobile Phone Apps as Interventions to Improve Adherence in Adolescents With Chronic Health Conditions: A Systematic Review [J].
Badawy, Sherif M. ;
Barrera, Leonardo ;
Sinno, Mohamad G. ;
Kaviany, Saara ;
O'Dwyer, Linda C. ;
Kuhns, Lisa M. .
JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2017, 5 (05)
[2]  
Bangor A, 2009, J USABILITY STUD, V4, P114
[3]  
Benyon D., 2017, DESIGNING USER EXPER, V4th ed.
[4]  
Brooke J., 1996, Usability Eval Ind, V189, P189
[5]  
Chambers Christine T, 2004, Paediatr Child Health, V9, P705
[6]   Designing a mixed methods study in primary care [J].
Creswell, JW ;
Fetters, MD ;
Ivankova, NV .
ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2004, 2 (01) :7-12
[7]   User-Centered Design and Interactive Health Technologies for Patients [J].
Dabbs, Annette De Vito ;
Myers, Brad A. ;
Mc Curry, Kenneth R. ;
Dunbar-Jacob, Jacqueline ;
Hawkins, Robert P. ;
Begey, Alex ;
Dew, Mary Amanda .
CIN-COMPUTERS INFORMATICS NURSING, 2009, 27 (03) :175-183
[8]   Mobile-based interventions for common mental disorders in youth: a systematic evaluation of pediatric health apps [J].
Domhardt, Matthias ;
Messner, Eva-Maria ;
Eder, Anna-Sophia ;
Engler, Sophie ;
Sander, Lasse B. ;
Baumeister, Harald ;
Terhorst, Yannik .
CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY AND MENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 15 (01)
[9]   Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: History, Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, and Rome IV [J].
Drossman, Douglas A. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (06) :1262-+
[10]   Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research [J].
Farmer, T ;
Robinson, K ;
Elliott, SJ ;
Eyles, J .
QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2006, 16 (03) :377-394