TODIM Multi-attribute Decision-Making Method Based on Spherical Fuzzy Sets

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Wenyu [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Weina [1 ]
Gao, Xue [1 ]
Zhang, Changyou [1 ]
Wang, Keya [3 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Posts & Telecommun, Xian 710016, Peoples R China
[2] China Res Inst Aerosp Syst Sci & Engn, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Lianhu Dist Urban Management & Comprehens Law Enf, Xian 710082, Peoples R China
来源
ADVANCES IN NATURAL COMPUTATION, FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, ICNC-FSKD 2022 | 2023年 / 153卷
关键词
Multi-attribute decision-making; Spherical fuzzy set; TODIM;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-20738-9_49
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
To solve the problem of wider fields of preference, taking into account the influence of risk attitudes of decision makers on decision outcomes and their membership degree, non-membership degree and hesitation degree squared less than or equal to 1, this article proposes to deploy the TODIM method extends to the spherical fuzzy set (SFS) to solve the problem of multi-attribute decision making. First, construct the initial decision matrix of alternatives on attributes and the weight matrix of decision makers on attributes; Then select the reference attributes to get the relative weight of each attribute relative to the reference attribute; The size of the score function value is used as the judgment basis to obtain the dominance among the alternatives; finally, the overall relative dominance of each alternative is calculated to obtain the ranking result. By selecting an example of a green supplier, the feasibility and effectiveness of the method are checked, comparison with the SFS-TOPSIS, SFS-VIKOR and SFS-DEMATEL methods. The results show that the method proposed in this paper does not ignore the decision makers. The impact of risk attitudes on decision making outcomes is in line with the actual situation of decision makers and is effective and achievable.
引用
收藏
页码:428 / 436
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel multi-attribute decision-making method based on fuzzy rough sets
    Ye, Jin
    Zhan, Jianming
    Xu, Zeshui
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 155
  • [2] An Improved Method Based on TODIM and TOPSIS for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Multi-Valued Neutrosophic Sets
    Xu, Dongsheng
    Peng, Lijuan
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2021, 129 (02): : 907 - 926
  • [3] A New Method Based on PROMETHEE and TODIM for Multi-Attribute Decision-Making with Single-Valued Neutrosophic Sets
    Xu, Dongsheng
    Wei, Xiaolan
    Ding, Hui
    Bin, Hongqiong
    MATHEMATICS, 2020, 8 (10) : 1 - 12
  • [4] Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems
    Ashraf, Shahzaib
    Abdullah, Saleem
    Mahmood, Tahir
    Ghani, Fazal
    Mahmood, Tariq
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (03) : 2829 - 2844
  • [5] A probabilistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral-based TODIM method for multi-attribute group decision-making
    Divsalar, Mehdi
    Ahmadi, Marzieh
    Ebrahimi, Elnaz
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 191
  • [6] A multi-attribute VIKOR Decision-making method based on hesitantneutrosophic sets
    Yu, Mingyang (myyu@sjtu.edu.cn), 1600, Universidad Central de Venezuela (55):
  • [7] METHOD OF FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING BASED ON THE DEVIATION MODEL
    Yang Jing
    Qiu Wanhua
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 38TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2008, : 603 - 607
  • [8] q-Spherical fuzzy rough sets and their usage in multi-attribute decision-making problems
    Bin Azim, Ahmad
    ALoqaily, Ahmad
    Ali, Asad
    Ali, Sumbal
    Mlaiki, Nabil
    Hussain, Fawad
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (04): : 8210 - 8248
  • [9] Method for hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making based on rough sets
    Zhu, L. (zflcz@163.com), 1600, Northeast University (29):
  • [10] Fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on eigenvector of fuzzy attribute evaluation space
    Gu, XB
    Zhu, QX
    DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 2006, 41 (02) : 400 - 410