Mifepristone priming and subsequent misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion in women with previous caesarean delivery

被引:4
|
作者
Dickinson, Jan E. [1 ,3 ]
Doherty, Dorota A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Maternal Fetal Med, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Biostat & Res Design Unit, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, King Edward Mem Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, 374 Bagot Rd, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
关键词
caesarean section; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; second trimester; uterine rupture; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13653
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess clinical outcomes and complications in women with >= 1 prior caesarean delivery (CS) during mid-pregnancy medical abortion with misoprostol following mifepristone priming. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of abortions at 13-28 weeks gestation using sequential mifepristone and misoprostol at a single centre from 1/2008-12/2018. Procedural outcomes were compared between cases with no prior CS, one prior and >= 2 prior CS. Results: There were 1399 consecutive women who underwent a medical abortion, with 304 (21.7%) having >= 1 prior lower segment CS (241 one, 49 two, 12 three, one four) and one a prior classical CS. Median gestation was 19 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 17-21) among nulliparas, multiparas with no prior CS and multiparas with prior CS, P = 0.505. Compared with nulliparas (median procedural duration 10.8 h, IQR 7.5-16.5; adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) = 1.20 95%CI 1.04-1.40, P = 0.015), multiparas with prior CS had a shorter procedural duration (9.5 h, IQR 6.5-13.5) while multiparas with no CS had the shortest duration (7.0 h, IQR 5.0-9.8; aHR = 2.28 95%CI 2.01-2.58, P < 0.001). Complications were more frequent with prior CS: estimated blood loss (medians: 100 cc no CS vs 150 cc >= 1 CS, P = 0.002), blood loss >1000 cc (3.6% no CS vs 7.2% >= 1 CS; odds ratio (OR) >= 2.11 95%CI 1.23-3.62, P = 0.007) and placental retention (17.3% no CS vs 25.3% >= 1 CS; adjusted OR = 1.44 95%CI 1.05-1.99, P = 0.024). Uterine rupture occurred in 4/304 women with >= 1 prior CS (1.3%). Conclusions: Mifepristone-misoprostol abortion in women with prior CS is generally safe but associated with an increased risk of procedural complications. Lowering of the misoprostol dosage with prior CS may reduce uterine rupture, although this hypothesis requires ongoing research.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A randomized controlled trial of different buccal misoprostol doses in mifepristone medical abortion
    Chong, Erica
    Tsereteli, Tamar
    Nhu Ngoc Thi Nguyen
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2012, 86 (03) : 251 - 256
  • [42] Second trimester abortion in women with and without previous uterine scar: Eleven years experience from a developing country
    Choudhary, Neelam
    Bagga, Rashmi
    Raveendran, Ainharan
    Saha, Subhas Chandra
    Dhaliwal, Lakhbir Kaur
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2011, 16 (05) : 378 - 386
  • [43] Comparing two early medical abortion regimens: mifepristone plus misoprostol vs. misoprostol alone
    Nguyen Thi Nhu Ngoca
    Blum, Jennifer
    Raghavan, Sheila
    Nguyen Thi Bach Nge
    Dabash, Rasha
    Diop, Ayisha
    Winikoff, Beverly
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 83 (05) : 410 - 417
  • [44] Comparison of mifepristone plus misoprostol with misoprostol alone for first trimester medical abortion: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shimels, Tariku
    Getnet, Melsew
    Shafie, Mensur
    Belay, Lemi
    FRONTIERS IN GLOBAL WOMENS HEALTH, 2023, 4
  • [45] Efficacy and safety of mifepristone and buccal misoprostol versus buccal misoprostol alone for medical abortion
    Dahiya, Krishna
    Ahuja, Kamlesh
    Dhingra, Atul
    Duhan, Nirmala
    Nanda, Smiti
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2012, 285 (04) : 1055 - 1058
  • [46] Mifepristone and misoprostol versus Dilapan and sulprostone for second trimester termination of pregnancy
    Jansen, Nicoline E.
    Pasker-De Jong, Pieternel C. M.
    Zondervan, Hans A.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (11) : 847 - 851
  • [47] Issues in second trimester induced abortion (medical/surgical methods)
    Lee, Vivian C. Y.
    Ng, Ernest H. Y.
    Ho, P. C.
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 517 - 527
  • [48] Low-dose Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination in Women with a Prior Caesarean Delivery
    Aydin, Emine
    Ozyuncu, Ozgur
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (11) : QC05 - QC07
  • [49] Combination of mifepristone and misoprostol vs misoprostol monotherapy for treatment of second-trimester pregnancy loss
    Valero, Irene
    Garcia-Jimenez, Rocio
    Maria Weber-Fernandez, Ana
    Diaz-Acedo, Rocio
    Jose Fobelo-Lozano, Maria
    Cerrillos, Lucas
    Ostos, Rosa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2022, 27 (04) : 341 - 344
  • [50] Misoprostol vs mifepristone and misoprostol in second trimester termination of pregnancy
    Tripti N.
    Namrata S.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2011, 61 (6) : 659 - 662