Mifepristone priming and subsequent misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion in women with previous caesarean delivery

被引:4
|
作者
Dickinson, Jan E. [1 ,3 ]
Doherty, Dorota A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Australia, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Maternal Fetal Med, Perth, WA, Australia
[2] Univ Western Australia, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, Biostat & Res Design Unit, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, King Edward Mem Hosp, Div Obstet & Gynaecol, 374 Bagot Rd, Subiaco, WA 6008, Australia
关键词
caesarean section; medical abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; second trimester; uterine rupture; PREGNANCY TERMINATION; VAGINAL MISOPROSTOL;
D O I
10.1111/ajo.13653
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aims: To assess clinical outcomes and complications in women with >= 1 prior caesarean delivery (CS) during mid-pregnancy medical abortion with misoprostol following mifepristone priming. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of abortions at 13-28 weeks gestation using sequential mifepristone and misoprostol at a single centre from 1/2008-12/2018. Procedural outcomes were compared between cases with no prior CS, one prior and >= 2 prior CS. Results: There were 1399 consecutive women who underwent a medical abortion, with 304 (21.7%) having >= 1 prior lower segment CS (241 one, 49 two, 12 three, one four) and one a prior classical CS. Median gestation was 19 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 17-21) among nulliparas, multiparas with no prior CS and multiparas with prior CS, P = 0.505. Compared with nulliparas (median procedural duration 10.8 h, IQR 7.5-16.5; adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) = 1.20 95%CI 1.04-1.40, P = 0.015), multiparas with prior CS had a shorter procedural duration (9.5 h, IQR 6.5-13.5) while multiparas with no CS had the shortest duration (7.0 h, IQR 5.0-9.8; aHR = 2.28 95%CI 2.01-2.58, P < 0.001). Complications were more frequent with prior CS: estimated blood loss (medians: 100 cc no CS vs 150 cc >= 1 CS, P = 0.002), blood loss >1000 cc (3.6% no CS vs 7.2% >= 1 CS; odds ratio (OR) >= 2.11 95%CI 1.23-3.62, P = 0.007) and placental retention (17.3% no CS vs 25.3% >= 1 CS; adjusted OR = 1.44 95%CI 1.05-1.99, P = 0.024). Uterine rupture occurred in 4/304 women with >= 1 prior CS (1.3%). Conclusions: Mifepristone-misoprostol abortion in women with prior CS is generally safe but associated with an increased risk of procedural complications. Lowering of the misoprostol dosage with prior CS may reduce uterine rupture, although this hypothesis requires ongoing research.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Medical abortion by mifepristone with oral versus vaginal misoprostol
    Jyothi, Shetty
    Pallavi, M. N. V.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY OF INDIA, 2006, 56 (06) : 529 - 531
  • [32] First trimester abortion with mifepristone and vaginal misoprostol
    Knudsen, UB
    CONTRACEPTION, 2001, 63 (05) : 247 - 250
  • [34] Induction of second trimester abortion (12-20 weeks) with mifepristone and misoprostol: a review of 386 consecutive cases
    Goh, SE
    Thong, KJ
    CONTRACEPTION, 2006, 73 (05) : 516 - 519
  • [35] Mifepristone and Misoprostol vs Misoprostol Alone in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
    Shah, Deepa
    Rijal, Pappu
    Thakur, Achala
    Rai, Rubina
    JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 56 (213) : 856 - 860
  • [36] A Comparative Study of Misoprostol Only and Mifepristone Plus Misoprostol in Second Trimester Termination of Pregnancy
    Akkenapally P.L.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2016, 66 (Suppl 1) : 251 - 257
  • [37] Comparison of Induction Abortion in the First Trimester Using Misoprostol Alone and Misoprostol With Estrogen Priming
    Teimoori, Batool
    Esmaeilpoor, Maryam
    Ashkezari, Azar Khaefi
    Farzaneh, Farahnaz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH AND REPRODUCTION SCIENCES, 2019, 7 (03): : 404 - 407
  • [38] Regimens of misoprostol with mifepristone for early medical abortion: a randomised trial
    Shannon, C.
    Wiebe, E.
    Jacot, F.
    Guilbert, E.
    Dunn, S.
    Sheldon, W. R.
    Winikoff, B.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (06) : 621 - 628
  • [39] Medical abortion in the second trimester
    Tang, OS
    Ho, PC
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2002, 16 (02): : 237 - 246
  • [40] First trimester abortion with mifepristone and three doses of sublingual misoprostol: a pilot study
    Singh, KC
    Ummat, S
    Rajaram, S
    Goel, N
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2005, 45 (06) : 495 - 498