Assembly area risk assessment methodology for post-flood evacuation by integrated neutrosophic AHP-CODAS

被引:12
作者
Sahmutoglu, Irem [1 ]
Taskin, Alev [2 ]
Ayyildiz, Ertugrul [3 ]
机构
[1] Bartin Univ, Dept Management & Org, TR-74100 Bartin, Turkey
[2] Yildiz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Istanbul, Turkey
[3] Karadeniz Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-61080 Trabzon, Turkey
关键词
Assembly point; Flood risk; Interval-valued neutrosophic numbers; AHP; CODAS; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DECISION-MAKING APPROACH; FLOOD RISK; SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT; CRITERIA; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-022-05712-1
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Floods are one of the natural disasters that affect human life materially and morally. There are various measures to prevent flood damage. The evaluation of flood risk and assembly points is of great importance for flood risk preparation and disaster mitigation measures. This study presents a two-stage framework with a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique for flood and assembly point risk assessment problems. First of all, with a detailed literature review, the main and sub-criteria affecting the flood and assembly points are determined. Each criterion is evaluated with expert opinion. Then, the importance weights of the criteria are determined with the Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (IVN-AHP) methodology. The ranking of the twelve assembly points in Bartin according to their risks is obtained by the Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Combinative Distance-based Assessment (IVN-CODAS) method. The proposed risk assessment methodology is applied to the Merkez district of Bartin, Turkey, which is frequently exposed to floods. In this context, a risk assignment hierarchy consisting of 6 main criteria as Topographic, Access, Hydrological, Sociological, Humanitarian Aid and Infrastructure and a total of 24 sub-criteria is constructed. The most important main criterion is determined as Topographic. Although 'Topographic' is the most important main criterion, considering that there is no significant difference between this criterion and the others, it is suggested that each criterion should be considered when determining the location of an assembly point. The results demonstrate that the most important sub-criterion is "Proximity to flood risk area" with a final weight of 0.076 among 24 criteria. The result of the proposed methodology is tested by sensitivity analysis. A comparative analysis is also done to verify the efficiency of the proposed methodology. The proposed integrated methodology is intended to be a useful tool for disaster risk assessments and to guide decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:1071 / 1103
页数:33
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
aa, SEL FELAKETININ YASA
[2]   Neutrosophic AHP-Delphi Group decision making model based on trapezoidal neutrosophic numbers [J].
Abdel-Basset, Mohamed ;
Mohamed, Mai ;
Sangaiah, Arun Kumar .
JOURNAL OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE AND HUMANIZED COMPUTING, 2018, 9 (05) :1427-1443
[3]   Shelter locations in evacuation: A Multiple Criteria Evaluation combined with flood risk and traffic microsimulation modeling [J].
Alam, Md Jahedul ;
Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul ;
Pothier, Emilie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 53
[4]   GIS-based comparative assessment of flood susceptibility mapping using hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach, naive Bayes tree, bivariate statistics and logistic regression: A case of Topla basin, Slovakia [J].
Ali, Sk Ajim ;
Parvin, Farhana ;
Quoc Bao Pham ;
Vojtek, Matej ;
Vojtekova, Jana ;
Costache, Romulus ;
Nguyen Thi Thuy Linh ;
Hong Quan Nguyen ;
Ahmad, Ateeque ;
Ghorbani, Mohammad Ali .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 117
[5]   GIS-based multi-criteria analysis for flood prone areas mapping in the trans-boundary Shatt Al-Arab basin, Iraq-Iran [J].
Allafta, Hadi ;
Opp, Christian .
GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2021, 12 (01) :2087-2116
[6]   Multi-criteria decision making for city-scale infrastructure of post-earthquake assembly areas: Case study of Istanbul [J].
Aman, Doga Dinemis ;
Aytac, Gulsen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2022, 67
[7]  
Aruldoss M., 2013, AM J INFORM SYSTEMS, V1, P31
[8]   MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) :37-45
[9]   A novel pythagorean fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology for e-scooter charging station location-selection [J].
Ayyildiz, Ertugrul .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 111
[10]   Individual credit ranking by an integrated interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy Electre methodology [J].
Ayyildiz, Ertugrul ;
Taskin Gumus, Alev ;
Erkan, Merve .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (21) :16149-16163