Mapping of instruments in Japanese for measuring evidence-based practice among clinical nurses: A scoping review

被引:0
作者
Tomotaki, Ai [1 ]
Morioka, Noriko [2 ]
Tsuda, Yasunobu [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Coll Nursing, Sch Nursing, Nursing Informat, 1-2-1 Umezono, Tokyo 2048575, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Grad Sch Hlth Care Sci, Tokyo, Japan
[3] St Marianna Univ Hosp, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
关键词
cross-cultural comparison; evidence-based practice; Japan; nursing; psychometrics; scoping review; PRACTICE QUESTIONNAIRE; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1111/ijn.13086
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims This work aims to map instruments available in Japanese that have been assessed for reliability or validity for measuring evidence-based practice (EBP) among clinical nurses. Background As EBP competencies comprise various domains, many EBP instruments have been developed. However, instruments available in Japanese for measuring EBP have not been reported systematically. Design We conducted a scoping review. Data sources Two different bibliography databases were searched to identify EBP instruments published until 2019: ICHUSHI (for Japanese articles) and PubMed. Review methods After relevant studies were screened and identified, study profile characteristics were extracted to identify EBP instruments in Japanese, and the quality of methodology for developing such instruments was evaluated. This information was recorded and the characteristics were descriptively summarized. Results Ninety potentially relevant articles were identified, of which seven articles and nine instruments were included in this review. All instruments were based on self-reported self-efficacy and attitudes. Few Japanese instruments included all the steps required for EBP. The overall reporting quality of each instrument was low. Conclusions EBP instruments available in Japanese are extremely scarce. The study results show that it is difficult to measure the various aspects of EBP with the existing instruments.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Evidence-based practice educational intervention studies: a systematic review of what is taught and how it is measured [J].
Albarqouni, Loai ;
Hoffmann, Tammy ;
Glasziou, Paul .
BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2018, 18
[2]  
[Anonymous], CONS BAS STAND SEL H
[3]  
Arksey H., 2005, Int J Soc Res Methodol, V8, P19, DOI [DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616, 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[4]  
Endo Y., 2009, J FACULTY NURSING, V11, P1
[5]   A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies [J].
Grant, Maria J. ;
Booth, Andrew .
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (02) :91-108
[6]   How to Add a Journal to the International Databases, Science Citation Index Expanded and MEDLINE [J].
Huh, Sun .
ARCHIVES OF PLASTIC SURGERY-APS, 2016, 43 (06) :487-490
[7]  
Institute of Medicine, 2009, Leadership Commitments to Improve Value in Health Care : Finding Common Ground: Workshop Summary
[8]   Number of papers published in English from the nursing departments of 42 national universities in Japan in the past ten years [J].
Kameoka, Junichi ;
Iwazaki, Junya ;
Takahashi, Fumie ;
Sato, Fumiko ;
Sato, Kazuki ;
Taguchi, Atsuko ;
Nakamura, Yasuka ;
Ishii, Seiichi ;
Kagaya, Yutaka .
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2016, 38 :138-143
[9]  
Kameoka T., 2012, J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci., V32, P12
[10]   Implementation outcome instruments for use in physical healthcare settings: a systematic review [J].
Khadjesari, Zarnie ;
Boufkhed, Sabah ;
Vitoratou, Silia ;
Schatte, Laura ;
Ziemann, Alexandra ;
Daskalopoulou, Christina ;
Uglik-Marucha, Eleonora ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Hull, Louise .
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (01)