Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review

被引:5
作者
Buchan, Skylar [1 ]
Kar, Ronit [1 ,2 ]
John, Mathews [1 ]
Post, Allison [1 ]
Razavi, Mehdi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Heart Inst, Electrophysiol Clin Res & Innovat, 6770 Bertner Ave, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Biomed Engn, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Div Cardiol, Dept Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Defibrillation; Painless defibrillation; Low-energy defibrillation; Ventricular fibrillation; Arrhythmias; Cardioversion; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR; VENTRICULAR-FIBRILLATION; INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION; ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; OPTICAL RECORDINGS; RABBIT HEART; SHOCKS; ELECTRODE; MECHANISMS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1007/s10557-021-07236-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Cardiac arrhythmias are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world, estimated to be responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. Our understanding of the electrophysiological mechanisms of such arrhythmias has grown since they were formally characterized in the late nineteenth century, and this has led to the development of numerous devices and therapies that have markedly improved outcomes for patients affected by such conditions. Despite these advancements, the application of a single large shock remains the clinical standard for treating deadly tachyarrhythmias. Such defibrillating shocks are undoubtedly effective in terminating such arrhythmias; however, they are applied without forewarning, contributing to the patient's stress and anxiety; they can be intensely painful; and they can have adverse psychological and physiological effects on patients. In recent years, there has been interest in developing defibrillation protocols that can terminate arrhythmias without crossing the human pain threshold for energy delivery, generally estimated to be between 0.1 and 1 J. In this article, we review existing literature on the development of such low-energy defibrillation methods and their underlying mechanisms, in an attempt to broadly describe the current landscape of these technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 340
页数:18
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] Sudden cardiac death: epidemiology and risk factors
    Adabag, A. Selcuk
    Luepker, Russell V.
    Roger, Veronique L.
    Gersh, Bernard J.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 7 (04) : 216 - 225
  • [2] Prevalence and Mechanism of Tricuspid Regurgitation following Implantation of Endocardial Leads for Pacemaker or Cardioverter-Defibrillator
    Al-Mohaissen, Maha A.
    Chan, Kwan Leung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2012, 25 (03) : 245 - 252
  • [3] USE OF EXTERNAL ELECTRIC COUNTERSHOCK IN TREATMENT OF VENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA
    ALEXANDER, S
    KLEIGER, R
    LOWN, B
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1961, 177 (13): : 916 - &
  • [4] Termination of sustained atrial flutter and fibrillation using low-voltage multiple-shock therapy
    Ambrosi, Christina M.
    Ripplinger, Crystal M.
    Efimov, Igor R.
    Fedorov, Vadim V.
    [J]. HEART RHYTHM, 2011, 8 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2019, Sudden Cardiac Death (Sudden Cardiac Arrest)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1933, POPULAR SCI, P25
  • [7] The Effects of Public Access Defibrillation on Survival After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest A Systematic Review of Observational Studies
    Baekgaard, Josefine S.
    Viereck, Soren
    Moller, Thea Palsgaard
    Ersboll, Annette Kjaer
    Lippert, Freddy
    Folke, Fredrik
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2017, 136 (10) : 954 - +
  • [8] Early history of defibrillation
    Ball, Christine M.
    Featherstone, Peter J.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2019, 47 (02) : 112 - 114
  • [9] Bardy GH, 2005, NEW ENGL J MED, V352, P2146
  • [10] Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks - Implications for defibrillation efficacy
    Behrens, S
    Li, CL
    Kirchhof, P
    Fabritz, FL
    Franz, MR
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1996, 94 (08) : 1974 - 1980