Kant as a carpenter of reason: the highest good and systematic coherence

被引:0
作者
Englert, Alexander T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Adv Study, Princeton, NJ USA
[2] Inst Adv Study, 1 Einstein Dr, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
关键词
Kant; Highest good; critique of the power of judgement; systematicity; worldview;
D O I
10.1080/09608788.2023.2293882
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
What is the highest good actually good for in Kant's third Critique? While there are well-worked out answers to this question in the literature that focus on the highest good's practical importance, this paper argues that there is an important function for the highest good that has to do exclusively with contemplation. This important function becomes clear once one notices that coherent [konsequent] thinking, for Kant, was synonymous with 'bundiges' thinking, and that both are connected with the highest good in the third Critique's moral proof for God's existence. I show that the original meaning of 'bundig', which is a forgotten term from the carpentry trade, illuminates the stakes of the highest good in Kant's system. For us, as proverbial carpenters of reason, coherence is essential for the intellectual activity of constructing a philosophical worldview in his transcendental idealism. I motivate the reading further by showing how this function can neatly reconstruct Kant's proof for God's existence in the third Critique. I conclude by sketching Kant's reasons for why the project of creating a coherent worldview grounded in the highest good is worth the labour costs.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 524
页数:29
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Adams Robert., 1987, VIRTUE FAITH
  • [2] Adickes Erich., 1920, KANTS OPUS POSTUMUM
  • [3] Ameriks Karl., 2013, Kant's Elliptical Path
  • [4] Bader Ralf M., 2015, The Highest Good in Aristotle and Kant, P183
  • [5] Beck LewisWhite., 1960, A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Practical Reason
  • [6] Beiser Frederick., 2006, CAMBRIDGE COMPANION, P588
  • [7] Brandt Reinhard, 2016, The Highest Good in Kants Philosophy, P111
  • [8] Demoralization and Hope: A Psychological Reading of Kant's Moral Argument
    Chignell, Andrew
    [J]. MONIST, 2023, 106 (01) : 46 - 60
  • [9] Chignell Andrew., 2020, Kant and Animals, P213
  • [10] Denis Lara., 2005, Kantian Review, V10, P33, DOI DOI 10.1017/S1369415400002120