Digitalization, trust, and sustainability transitions: Insights from two blockchain-based green experiments in China's electricity sector

被引:2
作者
Chen, Yushi [1 ]
Yu, Zhen [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Antai Coll Econ & Management, SJTU BOC Inst Technol & Finance, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Govt, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Trust; Digitalization; Blockchain; Sustainability transitions; Power; INNOVATION; TECHNOLOGY; NETWORKS; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eist.2023.100801
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Linking decarbonization with digitalization has been a promising trend in transition research. This paper explores how blockchain technologies matter in sustainability transitions through their key mechanism-trust-by comparing two blockchain-based green experiments in China's electricity sector. Blockchain technologies can bring institution-based trust among participating agents, but other types of trust are needed to promote this institution-trust to a system level. Incumbent actors have a greater advantage in mobilizing established trust relationships to promote blockchain-based green experiments and strengthen their power positions. It implies that digitalization may create unequal opportunities for incumbents and newcomers, leading to imbalanced trust and power relationships.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Digital platforms for smallholder credit access: The mediation of trust for cooperation in maize value chain financing [J].
Agyekumhene, Christopher ;
de Vries, Jasper R. ;
van Paassen, Annemarie ;
Macnaghten, Philip ;
Schut, Marc ;
Bregt, Arnold .
NJAS-WAGENINGEN JOURNAL OF LIFE SCIENCES, 2018, 86-87 :77-88
[2]   Credibility of Algorithm Based Decentralized Computer Networks Governing Personal Finances: The Case of Cryptocurrency [J].
Ahangama, Sapumal ;
Poo, Danny Chiang Choon .
HCI IN BUSINESS, GOVERNMENT, AND ORGANIZATIONS: ECOMMERCE AND INNOVATION, PT I, 2016, 9751 :165-176
[3]   Challenges and opportunities of blockchain energy applications: Interrelatedness among technological, economic, social, environmental, and institutional dimensions [J].
Ahl, Amanda ;
Goto, Mika ;
Yarime, Masaru ;
Tanaka, Kenji ;
Sagawa, Daishi .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 166
[4]   Blockchain and the evolution of institutional technologies: Implications for innovation policy [J].
Allen, Darcy W. E. ;
Berg, Chris ;
Markey-Towler, Brendan ;
Novak, Mikayla ;
Potts, Jason .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (01)
[5]   Regulating blockchain for sustainability? The critical relationship between digital innovation, regulation, and electricity governance [J].
Amenta, Carlo ;
Sanseverino, E. Riva ;
Stagnaro, Carlo .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2021, 76
[6]   On digitalization and sustainability transitions [J].
Andersen, Allan Dahl ;
Frenken, Koen ;
Galaz, Victor ;
Kern, Florian ;
Klerkx, Laurens ;
Mouthaan, Matthijs ;
Piscicelli, Laura ;
Schor, Juliet B. ;
Vaskelainen, Taneli .
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2021, 41 :96-98
[7]   Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities [J].
Andoni, Merlinda ;
Robu, Valentin ;
Flynn, David ;
Abram, Simone ;
Geach, Dale ;
Jenkins, David ;
McCallum, Peter ;
Peacock, Andrew .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 100 :143-174
[8]   POWER IN TRANSITION [J].
Gordon, Lincoln .
JOURNAL OF LAND AND PUBLIC UTILITY ECONOMICS, 1941, 17 (02) :255-256
[9]   Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective [J].
Avelino, Flor ;
Wittmayer, Julia M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY & PLANNING, 2016, 18 (05) :628-649
[10]   Uncertainties and risks in transitions to sustainable energy, and the part 'trust' might play in managing them: a comparison with the current pension crisis [J].
Bellaby, Paul .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (06) :2624-2630