Institutional investor heterogeneity and systemic financial risk: Evidence from China

被引:6
|
作者
Huang, Wenli [1 ]
Zhu, Yuanhao [1 ]
Li, Shi [2 ]
Xu, Yueling [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ Finance & Econ, China Acad Financial Res, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Carleton Univ, Sprott Sch Business, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Institutional investors; Systemic financial risk; Analysts ' attention; Stock price bubbles; HERDING BEHAVIOR; OWNERSHIP; PRICES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102162
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper explores the different effects of stress-resistant and stress-sensitive institutional investors on systemic financial risk in China. We show that systemic financial risk decreases with stress-resistant institutional shareholding but increase with stress-sensitive institutional shareholding. Two mediation mechanisms and two moderation mechanisms of analysts' attention and stock price bubbles are identified. Specifically, the analysts' attention presents a negative mediating effect and positive moderating effect between stress-resistant institutional shareholding and systemic financial risk, while stock price bubbles exhibit a negative mediating effect and positive moderating effect between stress-sensitive institutional shareholding and systemic financial risk. Our paper highlights the importance of appropriately guiding institutional investors to regulatory authorities, especially when institutional investors are encouraged to participate in Chinese stock markets.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Economic policy uncertainty, investor sentiment and systemic financial risk: Evidence from China
    Fang, Guobin
    Zhou, Xuehua
    Ma, Huimin
    Zhao, Xiaofang
    Deng, Yaoxun
    Xie, Luoyan
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2025, 76
  • [2] Institutional investor heterogeneity and firm valuation: Evidence from Latin America
    Camila De-la-Hoz, Maria
    Pombo, Carlos
    EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2016, 26 : 197 - 221
  • [3] Financial strength information and institutional investor demand: Evidence from India
    Gopikumar, V.
    Nair, Smitha
    Sreevathsava, S.
    Sreedharan, Raja, V
    COGENT ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2019, 7 (01):
  • [4] Institutional investor networks and firm innovation: Evidence from China
    Fan, Yaoyao
    Ly, Kim Cuong
    Jiang, Yuxiang
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 89
  • [5] Institutional investor heterogeneity and analyst recommendation: Malaysian evidence
    Qasem, Ameen
    Aripin, Norhani
    Wan-Hussin, Wan Nordin
    Al-Duais, Shaker
    COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 8 (01):
  • [6] Retail and Institutional Investor Trading Behaviors: Evidence from China
    Tan, Lin
    Zhang, Xiaoyan
    Zhang, Xinran
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2024, 16 : 459 - 483
  • [7] Institutional Investor Networks and ESG Performance: Evidence from China
    Yang, Baochen
    Guo, Chunying
    Fan, Ying
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2024, 60 (01) : 113 - 137
  • [8] Investor heterogeneity and negative skewness in stock returns: Evidence from institutional investors
    Benkraiem, Ramzi
    Goutte, Stephane
    Saadi, Samir
    Zhu, Hui
    Zhu, Steven
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2022, 81
  • [9] Family control, institutional investors, and financial distress: Evidence from China
    Li, Hongxiao
    Gao, Yunfan
    Zhu, Yanjian
    Dai, Lili
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2024, 64 (03) : 2485 - 2511
  • [10] Sponsor, institutional investor, and quotation behavior: Theory and evidence from China *
    Sun, Rui
    Guo, Junfei
    Yu, Wensong
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2023, 211 : 411 - 428