Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering

被引:5
作者
Thongprayoon, Charat [1 ]
Jadlowiec, Caroline C. [2 ]
Mao, Shennen A. [3 ]
Mao, Michael A. [4 ]
Leeaphorn, Napat [4 ,5 ]
Kaewput, Wisit [6 ]
Pattharanitima, Pattharawin [7 ]
Nissaisorakarn, Pitchaphon [8 ]
Cooper, Matthew [9 ]
Cheungpasitporn, Wisit [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Transplant Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Transplant Surg, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Med, Div Nephrol & Hypertens, Jacksonville, FL USA
[5] Renal Transplant Program, St Lukes Hlth Syst, Kansas City, MO USA
[6] Phramongkutklao Coll Med, Dept Mil & Community Med, Bangkok, Thailand
[7] Thammasat Univ, Dept Internal Med, Pathum Thani, Thailand
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[9] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Surg, Div Transplant, Milwaukee, WI USA
关键词
technology; outcomes research; methodology; health technology; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; SURVIVAL BENEFIT; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; CLASS DISCOVERY; TERM OUTCOMES; DIALYSIS; OCTOGENARIANS; CANDIDATES; ALLOCATION; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000137
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives This study aimed to identify distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients aged >= 80 and assess clinical outcomes among these unique clusters.Design Cohort study with machine learning (ML) consensus clustering approach.Setting and participants All very elderly (age >= 80 at time of transplant) kidney transplant recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database database from 2010 to 2019.Main outcome measures Distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients and their post-transplant outcomes including death-censored graft failure, overall mortality and acute allograft rejection among the assigned clusters.Results Consensus cluster analysis was performed in 419 very elderly kidney transplant and identified three distinct clusters that best represented the clinical characteristics of very elderly kidney transplant recipients. Recipients in cluster 1 received standard Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) non-extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from deceased donors. Recipients in cluster 2 received kidneys from older, hypertensive ECD deceased donors with a KDPI score >= 85%. Kidneys for cluster 2 patients had longer cold ischaemia time and the highest use of machine perfusion. Recipients in clusters 1 and 2 were more likely to be on dialysis at the time of transplant (88.3%, 89.4%). Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be preemptive (39%) or had a dialysis duration less than 1 year (24%). These recipients received living donor kidney transplants. Cluster 3 had the most favourable post-transplant outcomes. Compared with cluster 3, cluster 1 had comparable survival but higher death-censored graft failure, while cluster 2 had lower patient survival, higher death-censored graft failure and more acute rejection.Conclusions Our study used an unsupervised ML approach to cluster very elderly kidney transplant recipients into three clinically unique clusters with distinct post-transplant outcomes. These findings from an ML clustering approach provide additional understanding towards individualised medicine and opportunities to improve care for very elderly kidney transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Alyousef Awad A, 2018, J Healthc Inform Res, V2, P402, DOI [10.1007/s41666-018-0029-6, 10.1007/s41666-018-0029-6]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Am J Kidney Dis, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.09.002
[3]   Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus and Immunosuppression Selection in Older and Obese Kidney Recipients [J].
Axelrod, David A. ;
Cheungpasitporn, Wisit ;
Bunnapradist, Suphamai ;
Schnitzler, Mark A. ;
Xiao, Huiling ;
McAdams-DeMarco, Mara ;
Caliskan, Yasar ;
Bae, Sunjae ;
Ahn, JiYoon B. ;
Segev, Dorry L. ;
Lam, Ngan N. ;
Hess, Gregory P. ;
Lentine, Krista L. .
KIDNEY MEDICINE, 2022, 4 (01)
[4]   KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Candidates for Kidney Transplantation [J].
Chadban, Steven J. ;
Ahn, Curie ;
Axelrod, David A. ;
Foster, Bethany J. ;
Kasiske, Bertram L. ;
Kher, Vijah ;
Kumar, Deepali ;
Oberbauer, Rainer ;
Pascual, Julio ;
Pilmore, Helen L. ;
Rodrigue, James R. ;
Segev, Dorry L. ;
Sheerin, Neil S. ;
Tinckam, Kathryn J. ;
Wong, Germaine ;
Knoll, Gregory A. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 104 (04) :S11-S103
[5]   Distributing a limited resource: Ethical allocation of deceased donor kidneys [J].
Chumfong, Isabelle ;
Brown, Douglas ;
Keune, Jason ;
Kodner, Ira ;
Ray, Shuddhadeb ;
Zihni, Ahmed M. .
SURGERY, 2014, 156 (01) :198-203
[6]   The Future Role of Machine Learning in Clinical Transplantation [J].
Connor, Katie L. ;
O'Sullivan, Eoin D. ;
Marson, Lorna P. ;
Wigmore, Stephen J. ;
Harrison, Ewen M. .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2021, 105 (04) :723-735
[7]   The elderly as recipients of living donor kidneys, how old is too old? [J].
Cooper, Matthew ;
Forland, Cynthia L. .
CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 16 (02) :250-255
[8]   Immunosuppression of the elderly kidney transplant recipient [J].
Danovitch, Gabriel M. ;
Gill, Jagbir ;
Bunnapradist, Suphamai .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (03) :285-291
[9]   Training and Validation of Deep Neural Networks for the Prediction of 90-Day Post-Liver Transplant Mortality Using UNOS Registry Data [J].
Ershoff, Brent D. ;
Lee, Christine K. ;
Wray, Christopher L. ;
Agopian, Vatche G. ;
Urban, Gregor ;
Baldi, Pierre ;
Cannesson, Maxime .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (01) :246-258
[10]   Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients: Single-Center Experience in the Middle East [J].
Gheith, Osama ;
Halim, Medhat A. ;
Al-Otaibi, Torki ;
El-sayed, Ayman ;
Nair, Prasad ;
Mahmoud, Tarek ;
Fathy, Ahmed ;
Hameed, Mohamed Abdul ;
Samy, Ahmed ;
El Serwy, Nabil ;
Nagib, Ayman M. .
EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 17 :135-141