Policy initiatives for Artificial Intelligence-enabled government: An analysis of national strategies in Europe

被引:10
作者
van Noordt, Colin [1 ,4 ]
Medaglia, Rony [2 ]
Tangi, Luca [3 ]
机构
[1] TalTech, Ragnar Nurkse Dept Innovat & Governance, Tallinn, Estonia
[2] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Frederiksberg, Denmark
[3] European Commiss, Joint Res Ctr, Ispra, Italy
[4] TalTech, Ragnar Nurkse Dept Innovat & Governance, Ehitajate tee 5, EE-19086 Tallinn, Estonia
关键词
AI barriers; AI strategy; Artificial Intelligence; digital government transformation; public setor innovation; PUBLIC-SECTOR; GOVERNANCE; PLANS; IMPLEMENTATION; CHALLENGES; BARRIERS; DESIGN; SMART; MIXES; AI;
D O I
10.1177/09520767231198411
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Governments have been putting forward various proposals to stimulate and facilitate research on Artificial Intelligence (AI), develop new solutions, and adopt these technologies within their economy and society. Despite this enthusiasm, however, the adoption and deployment of AI technologies within public administrations face many barriers, limiting administrations from drawing on the benefits of these technologies. These barriers include the lack of quality data, ethical concerns, unawareness of what AI could mean, lack of expertise, legal limitations, the need for inter-organisational collaboration, and others. AI strategy documents describe plans and goals to overcome the barriers to introducing AI in societies. Drawing on an analysis of 26 AI national strategy documents in Europe analysed through the policy instrument lens, this study shows that there is a strong focus on initiatives to improve data-related aspects and collaboration with the private sector, and that there are limited initiatives to improve internal capacity or funding.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 253
页数:39
相关论文
共 107 条
  • [31] Ambidextrous practices in public service organizations: innovation and optimization tensions in Dutch water authorities
    Gieske, Hanneke
    Duijn, Michael
    van Buuren, Arwin
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 22 (03) : 341 - 363
  • [32] More than a digital system: how AI is changing the role of bureaucrats in different organizational contexts
    Giest, Sarah N.
    Klievink, Bram
    [J]. PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024, 26 (02) : 379 - 398
  • [33] Goldsmith S., 2014, The responsive city: Engaging communities through data-smart governance.
  • [34] Strategically constructed narratives on artificial intelligence: What stories are told in governmental artificial intelligence policies?
    Guenduez, Ali A.
    Mettler, Tobias
    [J]. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2023, 40 (01)
  • [35] Applying an Enterprise Data Model in Government: Transitioning to a Data-Centric Information System for Child Welfare in the US
    Harrison, Teresa
    Canestraro, Donna
    Pardo, Theresa
    Avila-Maravilla, Martha
    Soto, Nicolas
    Sutherland, Megan
    Burke, G. Brian
    Gasco, Mila
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH (DGO2019): GOVERNANCE IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2019, : 265 - 271
  • [36] Cultivating Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Digital Government
    Harrison, Teresa M.
    Luna-Reyes, Luis Felipe
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2022, 40 (02) : 494 - 511
  • [37] Uncertainty, risk and the use of algorithms in policy decisions: a case study on criminal justice in the USA
    Hartmann, Kathrin
    Wenzelburger, Georg
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 2021, 54 (02) : 269 - 287
  • [38] Hood C, 2007, The Tools of Government in the Digital Age
  • [39] Hood C., 1983, The Tools of Government
  • [40] Howlett M., 2014, Comparative policy studies: Conceptual and methodological challenges, P17, DOI [DOI 10.1057/9781137314154_2, 10.1057/97811373141542]