Consistency and diagnostic accuracy of 4 assays in the detection of the total and free prostate-specific antigen

被引:2
作者
Deng, Lingyan [1 ]
Yue, Daoyuan [1 ]
Wang, Xu [1 ]
Li, Huijun [1 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostate cancer; prostate -specific antigen (PSA); methodological comparison; PSA ASSAYS; INTERCHANGEABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; CALIBRATION; BIOLOGY;
D O I
10.21037/tau-23-29
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The lack of interchangeability among prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays causes difficulties in clinical interpretation. The currently available mainstream assays for PSA were based on Western populations, but it is not clear whether these assays yield different results in prostate cancer (PCa) screening in Chinese populations.Methods: A total of 163 men with a total PSA (tPSA) level of 2-10 mu g/L scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled in this study. The levels of the tPSA and free PSA (fPSA) were detected by the Beckman (using the Hybritech calibration), Roche, Abbott, and Mindray (using the World Health Organization's calibration). Methodological comparison were performed according to EP9-A3 of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, USA. With pathological diagnosis as the gold standard, the predictive accuracy of the biomarkers was quantified as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for each of the four methods.Results: A total of 32 PCa patients and 131 patients with benign prostate disease were included in this study. The tPSA levels detected by the Roche, Abbott, and Mindray showed good consistency with Beckman but not of the fPSA levels. Compared to the Beckman tPSA values, the measured values were 1.1% higher for Roche, 2.1% higher for Abbott, and 6.7% higher for Mindray. The fPSA levels measured by Roche, Abbott, and Mindray were 5.4% lower, 22.1% higher, and 4.6% higher than Beckman, respectively. When the tPSA was 4 ng/mL, the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and missed diagnosis rate) was similar among these 4 assays. When the %fPSA was 16%, Abbott had the highest missed diagnosis rate (37.50%), while Mindray had a sensitivity of 81.25%, the highest negative predictive value (93.88%), and the lowest missed diagnosis rate (18.75%).Conclusions: When the tPSA level is 2-10 ng/mL, the Mindray, like the Roche and Abbott, has good consistency with the Beckman in detecting tPSA, which makes it possible to relieve the pressure of clinical interpretation. However, 4 assays using the same %fPSA cut-off may lead to diverse missed diagnosis rates for PCa screening in China.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 270
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Biology of prostate-specific antigen
    Balk, SP
    Ko, YJ
    Bubley, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (02) : 383 - 391
  • [2] Blanchet J -S, 2008, J Med Biochem, V27, P161
  • [3] COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND SERUM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN THE EARLY DETECTION OF PROSTATE CANCER: RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER CLINICAL TRIAL OF 6,630 MEN
    Catalona, William J.
    Richie, Jerome P.
    Ahmann, Frederick R.
    Hudson, M'Liss A.
    Scardino, Peter T.
    Flanigan, Robert C.
    DeKernion, Jean B.
    Ratliff, Timothy L.
    Kavoussi, Louis R.
    Dalkin, Bruce L.
    Waters, W. Bedford
    MacFarlane, Michael T.
    Southwick, Paula C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (02) : S200 - S207
  • [4] Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease - A prospective multicenter clinical trial
    Catalona, WJ
    Partin, AW
    Slawin, KM
    Brawer, MK
    Flanigan, RC
    Patel, A
    Richie, JP
    deKernion, JB
    Walsh, PC
    Scardino, PT
    Lange, PH
    Subong, ENP
    Parson, RE
    Gasior, GH
    Loveland, KG
    Southwick, PC
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (19): : 1542 - 1547
  • [5] [陈锐 Chen Rui], 2015, [中华泌尿外科杂志, Chinese Journal of Urology], V36, P342
  • [6] Variability of assay methods for total and free PSA after WHO standardization
    Foj, L.
    Filella, X.
    Alcover, J.
    Auge, J. M.
    Escudero, J. M.
    Molina, R.
    [J]. TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2014, 35 (03) : 1867 - 1873
  • [7] Comparison of Three Assays for Total and Free PSA Using Hybritech and WHO Calibrations
    Garrido, Manuel M.
    Marta, Jose C.
    Ribeiro, Ruy M.
    Pinheiro, Luis C.
    Holdenrieder, Stefan
    Guimaraes, Joao t.
    [J]. IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (06): : 3431 - 3439
  • [8] Gu WJ., 2022, CHINESE J SURG ONCOL, V14, P224
  • [9] Standardization of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) assays: Can interchangeability of PSA measurements be improved?
    Ishibashi, M
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 52 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [10] Comparison of 6 automated assays for total and free prostate-specific antigen with special reference to their reactivity toward the WHO 96/670 reference preparation
    Kort, Sheila A. R.
    Martens, Frans
    Vanpoucke, Hilde
    van Duijnhoven, Hans L.
    Blankenstein, Marinus A.
    [J]. CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 52 (08) : 1568 - 1574