Effects of market liquidity on price dynamics in a heterogeneous belief model

被引:2
作者
Zhou, Yongguang [1 ]
Wang, Yiming [1 ,2 ]
Gao, Zhennan [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Econ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Key Lab Math Econ & Quantitat Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Cent Univ Finance & Econ, Business Sch, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Market liquidity; heterogeneous beliefs; asset pricing; adaptive belief system; price deviation; liquidity; BEHAVIORAL HETEROGENEITY; ASSET PRICES; STOCK; EXPECTATIONS; VOLATILITY; RETURNS; RISK; INFORMATION; PREMIUM; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2022.2100872
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
To understand the effect of liquidity on asset pricing, this study constructs a boundedly rational asset pricing model, introducing market liquidity and heterogeneous beliefs. Based on our model, we conduct empirical tests using the S&P 500 index from 1991 to 2021 and the CSI 500 index from 2007 to 2021. We find that market liquidity significantly influences investors' expectations and belief switching. When market liquidity is scarce, fundamentalists in both markets expect the price to converge more quickly to its fundamental value, whereas chartists perceive that the price deviates from its fundamental value less rapidly. Lack of liquidity mitigates the investors' original switching strategy, resulting in positive feedback as a net effect. Moreover, the S&P 500 index is efficient, whereas the CSI 500 index is slightly undervalued in the long run. Both markets exhibit large fluctuations and inefficiency during short periods such as the 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19 pandemic. As such, safeguards should be implemented against sudden shocks and the resulting price deviation and market inefficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1972 / 1989
页数:18
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Heterogeneous expectations in the foreign exchange market - Evidence from daily DM/US Dollar exchange rates [J].
Ahrens, R ;
Reitz, S .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS, 2005, 15 (01) :65-82
[2]  
Alfarano S, 2005, MODSIM 2005: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING, P779
[3]   Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects [J].
Amihud, Y .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL MARKETS, 2002, 5 (01) :31-56
[4]   ASSET PRICING AND THE BID ASK SPREAD [J].
AMIHUD, Y ;
MENDELSON, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1986, 17 (02) :223-249
[5]   What drives the liquidity premium in the Chinese stock market? [J].
An, Jiyoun ;
Ho, Kin-Yip ;
Zhang, Zhaoyong .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 54
[6]  
Anufriev M., 2004, LEM WORKING PAPER SE
[7]   Tests for bounded rationality with a linear dynamic model distorted by heterogeneous expectations [J].
Baak, SJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1999, 23 (9-10) :1517-1543
[8]   Behavioral heterogeneity in stock prices [J].
Boswijk, H. Peter ;
Hommes, Cars H. ;
Manzan, Sebastiano .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2007, 31 (06) :1938-1970
[9]  
Brock W., 1997, SYSTEMS DYNAMICS, P3
[10]   Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model [J].
Brock, WA ;
Hommes, CH .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 1998, 22 (8-9) :1235-1274