Reliability, Structure, and Validity of Module I (Personality Functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I)

被引:13
作者
Ohse, Ludwig [1 ]
Zimmermann, Johannes [2 ]
Kerber, Andre [3 ]
Kampe, Leonie [1 ,4 ]
Mohr, Jil [1 ]
Kendlbacher, Julia [1 ]
Busch, Oliver [1 ]
Rentrop, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Horz-Sagstetter, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Psycholog Hsch Berlin, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Kolln Pk 2, D-10179 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, Kassel, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Div Clin Psychol Intervent, Berlin, Germany
[4] Klinikum Itzehoe, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat Med, Itzehoe, Germany
[5] KBO Inn Salzach Klinikum, Wasserburg am Inn, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
关键词
personality disorders; personality functioning; Level of Personality Functioning Scale; AMPD; DSM-5; SEMISTRUCTURED INTERVIEW; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; PART I; LEVEL; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1037/per0000576
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
According to the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), a moderate or greater impairment in personality functioning is the essential criterion for a personality disorder diagnosis. Personality functioning is operationalized in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale via 4 domains (identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and 2 higher order dimensions (self and interpersonal functioning). The current study examined the reliability (interrater, test-retest), structure, and validity (convergent, discriminant, and incremental) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I). A clinical sample (n = 121) completed the SCID-5-AMPD-I, along with an interview for DSM-5 Section II personality disorders and self-reports for personality pathology (personality functioning, personality organization, personality structure, and pathological personality traits) and other forms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, somatization, and general disability). Interrater and test-retest reliability was excellent for overall personality functioning, the higher order dimensions, and the domains, except for the empathy domain in the test-retest condition. Factor analyses suggest that personality functioning is an essentially unidimensional construct. Personality functioning demonstrated high convergence with other forms of personality pathology and showed good discriminant validity in relation to depression, anxiety, and somatization but not in relation to the broader construct of general disability. Personality functioning (Criterion A) showed incremental validity over pathological personality traits (Criterion B) in predicting interview-assessed DSM-5 Section II personality disorders but not in predicting self-reported personality and general psychopathology. The present study suggests that the SCID-5-AMPD-I is a viable measure for personality functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 299
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders [J].
Johannes Zimmermann ;
André Kerber ;
Katharina Rek ;
Christopher J. Hopwood ;
Robert F. Krueger .
Current Psychiatry Reports, 2019, 21
[42]   A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders [J].
Zimmermann, Johannes ;
Kerber, Andre ;
Rek, Katharina ;
Hopwood, Christopher J. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2019, 21 (09)
[43]   It's not that Difficult: An Interrater Reliability Study of the DSM-5 Section III Alternative Model for Personality Disorders [J].
Garcia, Darren J. ;
Skadberg, Rebecca M. ;
Schmidt, Megan ;
Bierma, Shane ;
Shorter, Rebecca L. ;
Waugh, Mark H. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 100 (06) :612-620
[44]   SITUATING PSYCHOPATHY WITHIN THE DSM-5 ALTERNATIVE MODEL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS (AMPD) AMONG ITALIAN COMMUNITY-DWELLING ADULTS [J].
Palumbo, Isabella M. ;
Sica, Claudio ;
Patrick, Christopher J. ;
Latzman, Robert D. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2023, 37 (01) :49-+
[45]   An Agenda for Establishing the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder (AMPD) Trait Model in Adolescence: Comment on Clark and Watson (2022) [J].
Shiner, Rebecca L. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 13 (04) :340-342
[46]   The assessment of personality pathology in adolescence from the perspective of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorder [J].
Fossati, Andrea ;
Somma, Antonella .
CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 37 :39-43
[47]   Clinical profiles of adolescent personality pathology: a latent structure examination of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1) in a help-seeking sample [J].
Thomson, Madelyn ;
Cavelti, Marialuisa ;
Lerch, Stefan ;
Koenig, Julian ;
Reichl, Corinna ;
Muerner-Lavanchy, Ines ;
Wyssen, Andrea ;
Kaess, Michael .
BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER AND EMOTION DYSREGULATION, 2024, 11 (01)
[48]   The DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning and Severity of Iranian Patients With Antisocial and Borderline Personality Disorders [J].
Amini, Mehdi ;
Pourshahbaz, Abbas ;
Mohammadkhani, Parvaneh ;
Ardakani, Mohammad Reza Khodaie ;
Lotfi, Mozhgan .
IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (08)
[49]   Inter-Rater Reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID I) and Axis II Disorders (SCID II) [J].
Lobbestael, Jill ;
Leurgans, Maartje ;
Arntz, Arnoud .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY & PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2011, 18 (01) :75-79
[50]   Validity of the DSM-5 Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report [J].
Hopwood, Christopher J. ;
Good, Evan W. ;
Morey, Leslie C. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 100 (06) :650-659