Does moral distress in emergency department nurses contribute to intentions to leave their post, specialisation, or profession: A systematic review

被引:6
作者
Boulton, Olivia [1 ,3 ]
Farquharson, Barbara [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Fac Hlth Sci & Sport, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[2] Univ Stirling, NMAHP Res Unit, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
[3] Bygdoy Alle 20, N-0262 Oslo, Norway
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES | 2024年 / 6卷
关键词
Attrition; Emergency nursing; Emergency service; hospital; Moral distress; Moral injury; Moral distress measures; Nursing shortage; Personnel retention; Review; Systematic; PALLIATIVE CARE; COLLABORATION; SATISFACTION; RESILIENCE; BURNOUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnsa.2023.100164
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: There is a global shortfall of nurses. Despite national targets to increase nurse training and retention, the numbers leaving the profession continue to rise. Emergency departments (EDs) consistently record above average staff-turnover. Meanwhile descriptions of moral distress amongst emergency nurses are increasing. It is vital to consider the long-term emotional and psychological impact of moral distress on the emergency nursing workforce. However, the events which trigger moral distress in the emergency department may differ from those described in other clinical areas. A clearer understanding of the effects of moral distress on intention to leave could help identify those at risk and inform decisions on interventions designed to mitigate moral distress, aiding nurse retention and the organisational stability of health services. Aim: This systematic review aims to synthesise the available evidence on the association between moral distress and intention to leave in emergency nurses. Methods: A systematic search of studies was performed on MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Web of Science and Cochrane databases (8th -10th June 2022). Results were screened and qualityassessed with cross-checks. The heterogeneity of samples and insufficient data precluded statistical pooling and meta-analysis. Consequently, narrative synthesis was performed. Results: Five studies reported quantitative results eligible for synthesis. Low to moderate levels of moral distress were reported in emergency nurses; contrasting starkly with the significant proportion who reported having left or considered leaving due to moral distress (up to 51%). Sparse, mostly low-quality evidence was identified, highlighting a need for more robust research. Current tools for measuring moral distress appear not to capture the unique pressures which contribute to moral distress in emergency nurses. Conclusions: Emergency nurses cite moral distress as a reason for leaving. Further study is required to determine the levels of moral distress associated with intentions to leave and the strength of that association. This is fundamental to the design of effective retention policies. Future research should also explore the applicability of current moral distress measures to the emergency department, with consideration given to developing emergency department specific tools.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]   The association between fear of COVID-19 and mental health: The mediating roles of burnout and job stress among emergency nursing staff [J].
Ahorsu, Daniel Kwasi ;
Lin, Chung-Ying ;
Marznaki, Zohreh Hosseini ;
Pakpour, Amir H. .
NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (02) :1147-1154
[2]   Prevalence of severe moral distress among healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia [J].
Almutairi, Adel F. ;
Salam, Mahmoud ;
Adlan, Abdallah A. ;
Alturki, Abdullah S. .
PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 :107-115
[3]   RELATIONSHIPS AMONG PALLIATIVE CARE, ETHICAL, CLIMATE,EMPOWERMENT AND MORAL DISTRESS IN INTENSIVE CAR UNIT NURSES [J].
Altaker, Krista Wolcott ;
Howie-Esquivel, Jill ;
Cataldo, Janine K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 27 (04) :295-302
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies
[5]  
Anthony D., 2019, Researching Health: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods, V3rd, P506
[6]  
Arinda R., 2019, J. Nurs. Care, V2, P223
[7]   Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research [J].
Armijo-Olivo, Susan ;
Stiles, Carla R. ;
Hagen, Neil A. ;
Biondo, Patricia D. ;
Cummings, Greta G. .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 18 (01) :12-18
[8]  
Aveyard H., 2014, DOING LIT REV HLTH S
[9]   Moral distress and its contributing factors among emergency department nurses: A cross-sectional study in Iran [J].
Babamohamadi, Hassan ;
Katrimi, Safieh Bakuei ;
Paknazar, Fatemeh .
INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2021, 56
[10]  
Booth A., 2012, Systematic approaches to a successful literature review