Assessing anaerobic speed reserve: A systematic review on the validity and reliability of methods to determine maximal aerobic speed and maximal sprinting speed in running-based sports

被引:12
作者
Thron, Maximiliane [1 ]
Dueking, Peter [2 ]
Ruf, Ludwig [3 ,4 ]
Haertel, Sascha [3 ]
Woll, Alexander [1 ]
Altmann, Stefan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Sports & Sports Sci, Karlsruhe, Baden Wuerttemb, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Dept Sports Sci & Movement Pedag, Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany
[3] TSG 1899 Hoffenheim, Zuzenhausen, Baden Wurttembe, Germany
[4] TSG ResearchLab gGmbH, Zuzenhausen, Baden Wurttembe, Germany
关键词
FEMALE SOCCER PLAYERS; FIELD-TEST; PEAK SPEED; PERFORMANCE; VELOCITY; TIME; EXHAUSTION; FITNESS; TESTS; UNITS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0296866
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose Locomotor profiling using anaerobic speed reserve (ASR) enables insights into athletes' physiological and neuromuscular contributing factors and prescription of high-intensity training beyond maximal aerobic speed (MAS). This systematic review aimed to determine the validity and reliability of different methods to assess the characteristics of ASR, i.e., MAS and maximal sprinting speed (MSS). Methods A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Web of Science databases was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were included if they reported data on validity and/or reliability for methods to assess MAS or MSS. Results 58 studies were included with 28 studies referring to MAS and 30 studies to MSS. Regarding MAS, different methods for cardiopulmonary exercise testing yielded different values (four out of seven studies) of MAS (Cohen's d (ES) = 0.83-2.8; Pearson's r/intraclass correlation coefficient (r/ICC) = 0.46-0.85). Criterion validity of different field tests showed heterogeneous results (ES = 0-3.57; r/ICC = 0.40-0.96). Intraday and interday reliability was mostly acceptable for the investigated methods (ICC/r>0.76; CV<16.9%). Regarding MSS, radar and laser measurements (one out of one studies), timing gates (two out of two studies), and video analysis showed mostly good criterion validity (two out of two studies) (ES = 0.02-0.53; r/ICC = 0.93-0.98) and reliability (r/ICC>0.83; CV<2.43%). Criterion validity (ES = 0.02-7.11) and reliability (r/ICC = 0.14-0.97; CV = 0.7-9.77%) for global or local positioning systems (seven out of nine studies) and treadmill sprinting (one out of one studies) was not acceptable in most studies. Conclusion The criterion validity of incremental field tests or shuttle runs to examine MAS cannot be confirmed. Results on time trials indicate that distances adapted to the participants' sporting background, fitness, or sex might be suitable to estimate MAS. Regarding MSS, only sprints with radar or laser measures, timing gates, or video analysis provide valid and reliable results for linear sprints of 20 to 70 m.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 94 条
[51]   Can we use GPS for assessing sprinting performance in rugby sevens? A concurrent validity and between-device reliability study [J].
Lacome, Mathieu ;
Peeters, Alexis ;
Mathieu, Bertrand ;
Bruno, Marrier ;
Christopher, Carling ;
Piscione, Julien .
BIOLOGY OF SPORT, 2019, 36 (01) :25-29
[52]   ASSESSMENT OF RUNNING VELOCITY AT MAXIMAL OXYGEN-UPTAKE [J].
LACOUR, JR ;
PADILLAMAGUNACELAYA, S ;
CHATARD, JC ;
ARSAC, L ;
BARTHELEMY, JC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 62 (02) :77-82
[53]   Reliability of time-to-exhaustion versus time-trial running tests in runners [J].
Laursen, Paul B. ;
Francis, Graeme T. ;
Abbiss, Chris R. ;
Newton, Michael J. ;
Nosaka, Kazunori .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2007, 39 (08) :1374-1379
[54]  
Leger L, 1980, Can J Appl Sport Sci, V5, P77
[55]  
Lopes TR, 2016, J SPORT MED PHYS FIT, V56, P510
[56]  
Lorenzen C., 2009, International Journal of Sports Physiology Performance, V4
[57]   Set distance time trials for predicting maximal aerobic speed in female Australian Rules Footballers [J].
Lundquist, Mia ;
Nelson, Maximillian J. ;
Debenedictis, Thomas ;
Gollan, Stuart ;
Fuller, Joel T. ;
Larwood, Trent ;
Bellenger, Clint R. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2021, 24 (04) :391-396
[58]   Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? [J].
Ma, Lin-Lu ;
Wang, Yun-Yun ;
Yang, Zhi-Hua ;
Huang, Di ;
Weng, Hong ;
Zeng, Xian-Tao .
MILITARY MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2020, 7 (01)
[59]  
Majumdar AS, 2011, INT J SPORTS SCI COA, V6, P479, DOI 10.1260/1747-9541.6.3.479
[60]   Peak speed determination in football: is sprint testing necessary? [J].
Massard, Tim ;
Eggers, Tahleya ;
Lovell, Ric .
SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN FOOTBALL, 2018, 2 (02) :123-126