Changes in condylar position during orthodontic treatment depending on the amount of incisor retraction: a cone-beam computed tomography study

被引:1
作者
Cho, Sang Ah [1 ]
Chang, Pi-En [1 ]
Koh, Bumyeon
Park, Younjung [2 ]
Park, Jung Jin [3 ]
Choi, Yoon Jeong [1 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Inst Craniofacial Deform, Dept Orthodont, Coll Dent, 50-1 Yonsei Ro, Seoul 03722, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Dept Orofacial Pain & Oral Med, Coll Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dent Hosp, Dept Orthodont, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Premolar extraction treatment; Incisor retraction; Orthodontic treatment; Joint space; Temporomandibular disorder; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT MORPHOLOGY; CLASS-II MALOCCLUSION; PREMOLAR EXTRACTION; DISORDERS; ASSOCIATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-023-05149-1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
ObjectivesOrthodontic treatment may be associated with temporomandibular disorders through changes in the condylar position. This study aimed to evaluate changes in the condylar position among different amounts of maxillary incisor retraction during orthodontic treatment using cone-beam computed tomography images.Materials and methodsFifty-four participants were enrolled and divided into minimal (n = 14), moderate (n = 20), and maximal (n = 20) retraction groups based on the amount of incisor retraction (< 1, 1-6, and > 6 mm, respectively). Changes in condylar position before (T0) and after (T1) orthodontic treatment were assessed for the superior, anterior, posterior, and medial joint spaces (SJS, AJS, PJS, and MJS, respectively). Changes in joint spaces were compared between T0 and T1 in each group using paired t-tests and among the three groups using analysis of variance.ResultsAnterior movement of the condyle was observed in the maximal retraction group with a 0.2 mm decrease in & UDelta;AJS and a 0.2 mm increase in & UDelta;PJS, significantly greater than those in the minimal retraction group. The AJS and PJS showed statistically significant differences between T0 and T1 (P < 0.05) in the maximal retraction group.ConclusionsThe condyle may show a statistically significant but clinically insignificant forward movement in the maximal incisor retraction group, whereas it was relatively stable in the minimal and moderate incisor retraction groups.
引用
收藏
页码:5297 / 5307
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Three-dimensional assessment of condylar position and joint spaces after maxillary first premolar extraction in skeletal Class II malocclusion [J].
Alhammadi, M. S. ;
Fayed, M. S. ;
Labib, A. .
ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2017, 20 (02) :71-78
[2]  
ARTUN J, 1992, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V101, P48
[3]   Osteoarthritic changes and condylar positioning of the temporomandibular joint in Korean children and adolescents [J].
Cho, Bong-Hae ;
Jung, Yun-Hoa .
IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2012, 42 (03) :169-174
[4]  
Dalili Zahra, 2012, Dent Res J (Isfahan), V9, P607
[5]   Association between temporomandibular joint disc position evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging and mandibular condyle inclination evaluated by computed tomography [J].
De Stefano, Adriana A. ;
Guercio-Monaco, Elisabetta ;
Hernandez-Andara, Adalsa ;
Galluccio, Gabriella .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2020, 47 (06) :743-749
[6]  
Farrar WB, 1982, CLIN OUTLINE TEMPORO, P84
[7]   Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols [J].
Feragalli, Beatrice ;
Rampado, Osvaldo ;
Abate, Cecilia ;
Macri, Monica ;
Festa, Felice ;
Stromei, Francesco ;
Caputi, Sergio ;
Guglielmi, Giuseppe .
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2017, 122 (08) :581-588
[8]  
Fraga MR, 2013, MED SCI MONITOR, V19, P903, DOI 10.12659/MSM.889528
[9]   CONDYLAR POSITION AND EXTRACTION TREATMENT [J].
GIANELLY, AA ;
HUGHES, HM ;
WOHLGEMUTH, P ;
GILDEA, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1988, 93 (03) :201-205
[10]  
GIANELLY AA, 1991, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V99, P473