Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Haiqiong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yu [1 ]
Wang, Yanmei [3 ]
Ma, Yanru [1 ]
Niu, Na [1 ]
Jing, Hongli [1 ]
Huo, Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing Key Lab Mol Targeted Diag & Therapy Nucl M, State Key Lab Complex Severe & Rare Dis,Dept Nucl, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Med Sci Res Ctr, Beijing 100730, Peoples R China
[3] GE Healthcare China, Shanghai 200040, Peoples R China
关键词
PET; Image quality; Deep learning; Classification; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; MACULAR DEGENERATION; CLASSIFICATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12880-023-01017-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundA variety of external factors might seriously degrade PET image quality and lead to inconsistent results. The aim of this study is to explore a potential PET image quality assessment (QA) method with deep learning (DL).MethodsA total of 89 PET images were acquired from Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) in China in this study. Ground-truth quality for images was assessed by two senior radiologists and classified into five grades (grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, grade 4, and grade 5). Grade 5 is the best image quality. After preprocessing, the Dense Convolutional Network (DenseNet) was trained to automatically recognize optimal- and poor-quality PET images. Accuracy (ACC), sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), and area under the ROC Curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of all models. All indicators of models were assessed using fivefold cross-validation. An image quality QA tool was developed based on our deep learning model. A PET QA report can be automatically obtained after inputting PET images.ResultsFour tasks were generated. Task2 showed worst performance in AUC,ACC, specificity and sensitivity among 4 tasks, and task1 showed unstable performance between training and testing and task3 showed low specificity in both training and testing. Task 4 showed the best diagnostic properties and discriminative performance between poor image quality (grade 1, grade 2) and good quality (grade 3, grade 4, grade 5) images. The automated quality assessment of task 4 showed ACC = 0.77, specificity = 0.71, and sensitivity = 0.83, in the train set; ACC = 0.85, specificity = 0.79, and sensitivity = 0.91, in the test set, respectively. The ROC measuring performance of task 4 had an AUC of 0.86 in the train set and 0.91 in the test set. The image QA tool could output basic information of images, scan and reconstruction parameters, typical instances of PET images, and deep learning score.ConclusionsThis study highlights the feasibility of the assessment of image quality in PET images using a deep learning model, which may assist with accelerating clinical research by reliably assessing image quality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Image processing and Quality Control for the first 10,000 brain imaging datasets from UK Biobank [J].
Alfaro-Almagro, Fidel ;
Jenkinson, Mark ;
Bangerter, Neal K. ;
Andersson, Jesper L. R. ;
Griffanti, Ludovica ;
Douaud, Gwenaelle ;
Sotiropoulos, Stamatios N. ;
Jbabdi, Saad ;
Hernandez-Fernandez, Moises ;
Vallee, Emmanuel ;
Vidaurre, Diego ;
Webster, Matthew ;
McCarthy, Paul ;
Rorden, Christopher ;
Daducci, Alessandro ;
Alexander, Daniel C. ;
Zhang, Hui ;
Dragonu, Iulius ;
Matthews, Paul M. ;
Miller, Karla L. ;
Smith, Stephen M. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2018, 166 :400-424
[2]   Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology [J].
Antoch, G ;
Vogt, FM ;
Freudenberg, LS ;
Nazaradeh, F ;
Goehde, SC ;
Barkhausen, J ;
Dahmen, G ;
Bockisch, A ;
Debatin, JF ;
Ruehm, SG .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (24) :3199-3206
[3]   Reference Range for Intrapatient Variability in Blood-Pool and Liver SUV for 18F-FDG PET [J].
Boktor, Raef R. ;
Walker, Gregory ;
Stacey, Roderick ;
Gledhill, Samuel ;
Pitman, Alexander G. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2013, 54 (05) :677-682
[4]   Application of PET/CT in the development of novel anticancer drugs [J].
Boss, David S. ;
Olmos, Renato Valdes ;
Sinaasappel, Michiel ;
Beijnen, Jos H. ;
Schellens, Jan H. M. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2008, 13 (01) :25-38
[5]   Automatic quality control of brain T1-weighted magnetic resonance images for a clinical data warehouse [J].
Bottani, Simona ;
Burgos, Ninon ;
Maire, Aurelien ;
Wild, Adam ;
Stroer, Sebastian ;
Dormont, Didier ;
Colliot, Olivier .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2022, 75
[6]   Quality and and content analysis of fundus images using deep learning [J].
Chalakkal, Renoh Johnson ;
Abdulla, Waleed Habib ;
Thulaseedharan, Sinumol Sukumaran .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 108 :317-331
[7]  
Czajkowska J, 2022, SENSORS-BASEL, P22
[8]   High-Frequency Ultrasound Dataset for Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Assessment [J].
Czajkowska, Joanna ;
Juszczyk, Jan ;
Piejko, Laura ;
Glenc-Ambrozy, Malgorzata .
SENSORS, 2022, 22 (04)
[9]   Automated deep learning design for medical image classification by health-care professionals with no coding experience: a feasibility study [J].
Faes, Livia ;
Wagner, Siegfried K. ;
Fu, Dun Jack ;
Liu, Xiaoxuan ;
Korot, Edward ;
Ledsam, Joseph R. ;
Back, Trevor ;
Chopra, Reena ;
Pontikos, Nikolas ;
Kern, Christoph ;
Moraes, Gabriella ;
Schmid, Martin K. ;
Sim, Dawn ;
Balaskas, Konstantinos ;
Bachmann, Lucas M. ;
Denniston, Alastair K. ;
Keane, Pearse A. .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2019, 1 (05) :E232-E242
[10]   Quantitative Classification of Eyes with and without Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration Using Optical Coherence Tomography [J].
Farsiu, Sina ;
Chiu, Stephanie J. ;
O'Connell, Rachelle V. ;
Folgar, Francisco A. ;
Yuan, Eric ;
Izatt, Joseph A. ;
Toth, Cynthia A. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 121 (01) :162-172