Prehospital and In-Hospital Treatment with Adrenaline and Related Prognosis in Anaphylaxis Patients

被引:0
作者
Holst Gudichsen, Julie [1 ]
Aggerholm Baekdal, Emil [1 ]
Mikkelsen, Soren [2 ]
Touborg Lassen, Annmarie
Bloch Jessen, Frederik [1 ]
Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten [1 ]
Mortz, Charlotte G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Odense Res Ctr Anaphylaxis, Dept Dermatol & Allergy Ctr, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Reg Southern Denmark, Prehosp Res Unit, Odense, Denmark
关键词
Anaphylaxis; Adrenaline; Antihistamine; Corticosteroids; Prehospital system; Emergency department; Treatment; Prognosis; EPINEPHRINE; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PARAMEDICS; TRIGGERS;
D O I
10.1159/000536315
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although intramuscular adrenaline is the recommended first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, not all patients receive this treatment. The consequences in daily clinical practice are sparsely described. This study aimed to investigate the treatment administered to anaphylactic patients and the related prognosis. Methods: A retrospective register-based study of patients with anaphylaxis referred to the allergy centre, Odense University Hospital (2019-2021). Each patient's medical records were reviewed for contacts with the emergency departments and the prehospital emergency medical service in the Region of Southern Denmark. The World Allergy Organization (WAO) grading system was used to assess the severity of prehospital and in-hospital anaphylaxis. Furthermore, the treatment administered to the patients was registered. Results: In total, 315 patients were included. The prehospital system had contact with 256 of these patients (two were released prehospitally following treatment and 12 patients had insufficient data to assess anaphylaxis). Of the remaining 242 patients, 115 had anaphylaxis prehospitally (WAO grades 3-5); 59% (67/115) received adrenaline. Among the 67 patients who received prehospital adrenaline, 9 patients (13.4%; 95% CI: 6.3-24.0%) still had anaphylaxis at arrival at the emergency department. Of the 48 patients that were not treated with prehospital adrenaline, 17 patients (35.5%; 95% CI: 22.1-50.5) had anaphylaxis at the arrival to the emergency department. Among the 127 patients without prehospital anaphylaxis (WAO grades 0-2), 22 patients (18.2%; 95% CI: 11.8-26.2%) who did not receive prehospital adrenaline had anaphylaxis at arrival to the emergency department, while none of the 6 patients treated prehospitally with adrenaline had anaphylaxis. Conclusion: Omission of prehospital adrenaline in anaphylactic patients is associated with more severe anaphylactic symptoms at arrival to the hospital. Adrenaline treatment remains suboptimal since only half of the patients received prehospital adrenaline and only 1 out of 4 patients, with clinical signs of anaphylaxis, received adrenaline inside the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 687
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment with Epinephrine (Adrenaline) in Suspected Anaphylaxis during Anesthesia in Denmark
    Garvey, Lene H.
    Belhage, Bo
    Kroigaard, Mogens
    Husum, Bent
    Malling, Hans-Jorgen
    Mosbech, Holger
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 115 (01) : 111 - 116
  • [32] Long-term prognosis for patients with COPD treated in the prehospital setting - Is it influenced by hospital admission?
    Steinmetz, Jacob
    Rasmussen, Lars S.
    Nielsen, Soren L.
    [J]. CHEST, 2006, 130 (03) : 676 - 680
  • [33] Can the prehospital National Early Warning Score 2 identify patients at risk of in-hospital early mortality? A prospective, multicenter cohort study
    Martin-Rodriguez, Francisco
    Lopez-Izquierdo, Raul
    del Pozo Vegas, Carlos
    Sanchez-Soberon, Irene
    Delgado-Benito, Juan F.
    Luis Martin-Conty, Jose
    Castro-Villamor, Miguel A.
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2020, 49 (05): : 585 - 591
  • [34] A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care
    Evenson, K. R.
    Foraker, R. E.
    Morris, D. L.
    Rosamond, W. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2009, 4 (03) : 187 - 199
  • [35] Outcomes associated with prehospital epinephrine in adult and pediatric patients with anaphylaxis
    Hlady, Andrea L.
    Weinman, Aliza F.
    Zhang, Yuedan
    Mullan, Aidan F.
    Campbell, Ronna L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF ALLERGY ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 133 (05) : 592 - 599.e8
  • [36] Comprehensive hospital-based regional survey of anaphylaxis in Japanese children: Time trends of triggers and adrenaline use
    Kitamura, Katsumasa
    Ito, Tomoya
    Ito, Komei
    [J]. ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 70 (04) : 452 - 457
  • [37] The influences of adrenaline dosing frequency and dosage on outcomes of adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study
    Wang, Chih-Hung
    Huang, Chien-Hua
    Chang, Wei-Tien
    Tsai, Min-Shan
    Yu, Ping-Hsun
    Wu, Yen-Wen
    Hung, Kuan-Yu
    Chen, Wen-Jone
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2016, 103 : 125 - 130
  • [38] Assessment of the use of adrenaline auto-injectors among a logia bez u i 1 adult patients at risk of anaphylaxis
    Ozdemir, Ebru
    Damadoglu, Ebru
    Karakaya, Gul
    Kalyoncu, Ali
    [J]. ALERGOLOGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF ALLERGOLOGY, 2022, 9 (03) : 186 - 190
  • [39] Valve surgery in active infective endocarditis: A simple score to predict in-hospital prognosis
    Martinez-Selles, Manuel
    Munoz, Patricia
    Arnaiz, Ana
    Moreno, Mar
    Galvez, Juan
    Rodriguez-Roda, Jorge
    de Alarcon, Aristides
    Cabrera, Emilio Garcia
    Farinas, Maria C.
    Miro, Jose M.
    Montejo, Miguel
    Moreno, Alfonso
    Ruiz-Morales, Josefa
    Goenaga, Miguel A.
    Bouza, Emilio
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2014, 175 (01) : 133 - 137
  • [40] Vasopressin and Steroids as Adjunctive Treatment for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
    Haukoos, Jason
    Douglas, Ivor S.
    Sasson, Comilla
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 326 (16): : 1583 - 1585