Prehospital and In-Hospital Treatment with Adrenaline and Related Prognosis in Anaphylaxis Patients

被引:0
|
作者
Holst Gudichsen, Julie [1 ]
Aggerholm Baekdal, Emil [1 ]
Mikkelsen, Soren [2 ]
Touborg Lassen, Annmarie
Bloch Jessen, Frederik [1 ]
Bindslev-Jensen, Carsten [1 ]
Mortz, Charlotte G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Odense Univ Hosp, Odense Res Ctr Anaphylaxis, Dept Dermatol & Allergy Ctr, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, Reg Southern Denmark, Prehosp Res Unit, Odense, Denmark
关键词
Anaphylaxis; Adrenaline; Antihistamine; Corticosteroids; Prehospital system; Emergency department; Treatment; Prognosis; EPINEPHRINE; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PARAMEDICS; TRIGGERS;
D O I
10.1159/000536315
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction: Although intramuscular adrenaline is the recommended first-line treatment for anaphylaxis, not all patients receive this treatment. The consequences in daily clinical practice are sparsely described. This study aimed to investigate the treatment administered to anaphylactic patients and the related prognosis. Methods: A retrospective register-based study of patients with anaphylaxis referred to the allergy centre, Odense University Hospital (2019-2021). Each patient's medical records were reviewed for contacts with the emergency departments and the prehospital emergency medical service in the Region of Southern Denmark. The World Allergy Organization (WAO) grading system was used to assess the severity of prehospital and in-hospital anaphylaxis. Furthermore, the treatment administered to the patients was registered. Results: In total, 315 patients were included. The prehospital system had contact with 256 of these patients (two were released prehospitally following treatment and 12 patients had insufficient data to assess anaphylaxis). Of the remaining 242 patients, 115 had anaphylaxis prehospitally (WAO grades 3-5); 59% (67/115) received adrenaline. Among the 67 patients who received prehospital adrenaline, 9 patients (13.4%; 95% CI: 6.3-24.0%) still had anaphylaxis at arrival at the emergency department. Of the 48 patients that were not treated with prehospital adrenaline, 17 patients (35.5%; 95% CI: 22.1-50.5) had anaphylaxis at the arrival to the emergency department. Among the 127 patients without prehospital anaphylaxis (WAO grades 0-2), 22 patients (18.2%; 95% CI: 11.8-26.2%) who did not receive prehospital adrenaline had anaphylaxis at arrival to the emergency department, while none of the 6 patients treated prehospitally with adrenaline had anaphylaxis. Conclusion: Omission of prehospital adrenaline in anaphylactic patients is associated with more severe anaphylactic symptoms at arrival to the hospital. Adrenaline treatment remains suboptimal since only half of the patients received prehospital adrenaline and only 1 out of 4 patients, with clinical signs of anaphylaxis, received adrenaline inside the hospital.
引用
收藏
页码:678 / 687
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes and Factors Associated With Prehospital Treatment of Pediatric Anaphylaxis
    Trainor, Jennifer L.
    Pittsenbarger, Zachary E.
    Joshi, Deepa
    Adler, Mark D.
    Smith, Bridget
    Gupta, Ruchi S.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2022, 38 (01) : E69 - E74
  • [2] Adrenaline in the Acute Treatment of Anaphylaxis
    Ring, Johannes
    Klimek, Ludger
    Worm, Margitta
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 115 (31-32): : 528 - +
  • [3] Adrenaline in anaphylaxis treatment. Balancing benefits and harms
    Cervellin, Gianfranco
    Sanchis-Gomar, Fabian
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 15 (06) : 741 - 746
  • [4] Adrenaline for the treatment of anaphylaxis: cochrane systematic review
    Sheikh, A.
    Shehata, Y. A.
    Brown, S. G. A.
    Simons, F. E. R.
    ALLERGY, 2009, 64 (02) : 204 - 212
  • [5] Anaphylaxis Refractory to intramuscular adrenaline during in-hospital food challenges: A case series and proposed management
    Alviani, Cherry
    Burrell, Sarah
    Macleod, Abigail
    Edees, Susan
    Roberts, Graham
    Turner, Paul J.
    Erlewyn-Lajeunesse, Michel
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2020, 50 (12) : 1400 - 1405
  • [6] Investigation of the underuse of adrenaline (epinephrine) and prognosis among patients with anaphylaxis at emergency department admission
    Lin, Yen-Yue
    Chang, Hsin-An
    Kao, Yung-Hsi
    Chuu, Chih-Pin
    Chiang, Wen-Fang
    Chang, Ya-Chieh
    Li, Yuan-Kuei
    Chu, Chi-Ming
    Chan, Jenq-Shyong
    Hsiao, Po-Jen
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [7] Prehospital and in-hospital course of care for patients with acute heart failure: Features and impact on prognosis in "real life"
    Cluzol, Laura
    Cautela, Jennifer
    Michelet, Pierre
    Roch, Antoine
    Kerbaul, Francois
    Mancini, Julien
    Laine, Marc
    Peyrol, Michael
    Robin, Floriane
    Paganelli, Franck
    Bonello, Laurent
    Thuny, Franck
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2017, 110 (02) : 72 - 81
  • [8] What are the 'ideal' features of an adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injector in the treatment of anaphylaxis?
    Frew, A. J.
    ALLERGY, 2011, 66 (01) : 15 - 24
  • [9] Glucocorticoids and Rates of Biphasic Reactions in Patients with Adrenaline-Treated Anaphylaxis: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Nagata, Shimpei
    Ohbe, Hiroyuki
    Jo, Taisuke
    Matsui, Hiroki
    Fushimi, Kiyohide
    Yasunaga, Hideo
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 183 (09) : 939 - 945
  • [10] Anaphylaxis: lack of hospital doctors' knowledge of adrenaline (epinephrine) administration in adults could endanger patients' safety
    Droste, J.
    Narayan, N.
    EUROPEAN ANNALS OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2012, 44 (03) : 122 - 127