Assessing grassland cultural ecosystem services supply and demand for promoting the sustainable realization of grassland cultural values

被引:16
作者
Wang, Lan [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Lin [1 ]
Cao, Wei [1 ]
Zhai, Jun [3 ]
Fan, Jiangwen [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Land Surface Pattern & Simulat, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Ecol & Environm Peoples Republ China, Satellite Applicat Ctr Ecol & Environm, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
关键词
Grassland cultural ecosystem services; Supply and demand relationship; SolVES model; Social media; Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region; OUTDOOR RECREATION; LANDSCAPE; INDICATORS; AREAS; FLOW; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Grasslands deliver essential provisioning and regulatory ecosystem services, concomitantly with indispensable cultural services that merit profound consideration. However, grassland cultural ecosystem services (GCES) face a conspicuous knowledge lacuna due to the lack of a unified research framework and quantitative methodology. This study endeavors to fill this gap by quantifying the potential supply and actual demand of GCES, concurrently scrutinizing spatial congruencies and disparities between GCES supply and demand in Inner Mongolia Auton-omous Region (IMAR), China. To achieve this, we integrated social survey data, Point of Interest (POI) data, social media data, the Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) model and GIS Getis-Ord Gi* statistical analysis. Our analysis unveiled grid-scale spatial patterns of GCES supply and demand, furnishing a nuanced high-low ranking of GCES. It transpired that scenic travel holds the highest potential supply of GCES with a high-value area proportion of 46.0 %, while grassland recuperation ranks the lowest. Notably, road accessibility emerged as the most crucial factor influencing GCES patterns. Furthermore, we observed a substantial misalignment in the GCES supply-demand relationship, with 65.99 % of IMAR experiencing excess supply compared to demand and only 20.66 % achieving equilibrium. At a 95 % significance level, hot spots (excess supply) and cold spots (excess demand) accounted for 26.03 % and 22 %, respectively. We propose targeted suggestions that regions with oversupply of GCES should channel efforts toward augmenting road accessibility, whereas regions grappling with excess demand should prioritize the judicious allocation of resources to avert surpassing the environmental carrying capacity. Our study furnished insights for decision-makers to formulate sustainable development plans pertaining to grassland culture.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services [J].
Ala-Hulkko, Terhi ;
Kotavaara, Ossi ;
Alahuhta, Janne ;
Helle, Pekka ;
Hjort, Jan .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 :416-427
[2]   Evaluating alternative methods for biophysical and cultural ecosystem services hotspot mapping in natural resource planning [J].
Bagstad, Kenneth J. ;
Semmens, Darius J. ;
Ancona, Zachary H. ;
Sherrouse, Benson C. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (01) :77-97
[3]  
Syrbe Ralf-Uwe, 2017, International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management, V13, P148, DOI [10.1080/21513732.2017.1407362, 10.1080/21513732.2016.1248865]
[4]   Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets [J].
Burkhard, Benjamin ;
Kroll, Franziska ;
Nedkov, Stoyan ;
Mueller, Felix .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2012, 21 :17-29
[5]   Quantifying ecosystem services supply and demand shortfalls and mismatches for management optimisation [J].
Chen, Junyu ;
Jiang, Bo ;
Bai, Yang ;
Xu, Xibao ;
Alatalo, Juha M. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 650 :1426-1439
[6]   The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital [J].
Costanza, R ;
dArge, R ;
deGroot, R ;
Farber, S ;
Grasso, M ;
Hannon, B ;
Limburg, K ;
Naeem, S ;
ONeill, RV ;
Paruelo, J ;
Raskin, RG ;
Sutton, P ;
vandenBelt, M .
NATURE, 1997, 387 (6630) :253-260
[7]   Potential supply and actual use of cultural ecosystem services in mountain protected areas and their surroundings [J].
Crouzat, Emilie ;
De Frutos, Angel ;
Grescho, Volker ;
Carver, Steve ;
Bueermann, Andrea ;
Carvalho-Santos, Claudia ;
Kraemer, Roland ;
Mayor, Sarah ;
Poepperl, Franziska ;
Rossi, Christian ;
Schroeter, Matthias ;
Stritih, Ana ;
Vaz, Ana Sofia ;
Watzema, Jan ;
Bonn, Aletta .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2022, 53
[8]  
Daily G. C., 1997, Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems., P113
[9]   Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda [J].
Daniel, Terry C. ;
Muhar, Andreas ;
Arnberger, Arne ;
Aznar, Olivier ;
Boyd, James W. ;
Chan, Kai M. A. ;
Costanza, Robert ;
Elmqvist, Thomas ;
Flint, Courtney G. ;
Gobster, Paul H. ;
Gret-Regamey, Adrienne ;
Lave, Rebecca ;
Muhar, Susanne ;
Penker, Marianne ;
Ribe, Robert G. ;
Schauppenlehner, Thomas ;
Sikor, Thomas ;
Soloviy, Ihor ;
Spierenburg, Marja ;
Taczanowska, Karolina ;
Tam, Jordan ;
von der Dunk, Andreas .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2012, 109 (23) :8812-8819
[10]   Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on cultural ecosystem services from urban green spaces: a case from English Bazar Urban Agglomeration, Eastern India [J].
Das, Arijit ;
Das, Manob ;
Saha, Swarnali ;
Pereira, Paulo .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (24) :65933-65946