Assessment of Crop Yield in China Simulated by Thirteen Global Gridded Crop Models

被引:2
|
作者
Yin, Dezhen [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fang [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Yaqiong [3 ]
Zeng, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Zhongda [2 ,4 ]
Zhou, Yanqing [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, Int Ctr Climate & Environm Sci, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mt Hazards & Environm, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Atmospher Phys, State Key Lab Numer Modeling Atmospher Sci & Geoph, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
global gridded crop model; historical crop yield; China; multi-model evaluation; CLIMATE-CHANGE; EAST CHINA; LAND-USE; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; GROWTH; WATER; BENCHMARKING; NITROGEN; DATASET;
D O I
10.1007/s00376-023-2234-3
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Global gridded crop models (GGCMs) have been broadly applied to assess the impacts of climate and environmental change and adaptation on agricultural production. China is a major grain producing country, but thus far only a few studies have assessed the performance of GGCMs in China, and these studies mainly focused on the average and interannual variability of national and regional yields. Here, a systematic national- and provincial-scale evaluation of the simulations by 13 GGCMs [12 from the GGCM Intercomparison (GGCMI) project, phase 1, and CLM5-crop] of the yields of four crops (wheat, maize, rice, and soybean) in China during 1980-2009 was carried out through comparison with crop yield statistics collected from the National Bureau of Statistics of China. Results showed that GGCMI models generally underestimate the national yield of rice but overestimate it for the other three crops, while CLM5-crop can reproduce the national yields of wheat, maize, and rice well. Most GGCMs struggle to simulate the spatial patterns of crop yields. In terms of temporal variability, GGCMI models generally fail to capture the observed significant increases, but some can skillfully simulate the interannual variability. Conversely, CLM5-crop can represent the increases in wheat, maize, and rice, but works less well in simulating the interannual variability. At least one model can skillfully reproduce the temporal variability of yields in the top-10 producing provinces in China, albeit with a few exceptions. This study, for the first time, provides a complete picture of GGCM performance in China, which is important for GGCM development and understanding the reliability and uncertainty of national- and provincial-scale crop yield prediction in China.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 434
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Global gridded crop harvested area, production, yield, and monthly physical area data circa 2015
    Danielle Grogan
    Steve Frolking
    Dominik Wisser
    Alex Prusevich
    Stanley Glidden
    Scientific Data, 9
  • [22] Decomposing global crop yield variability
    Ben-Ari, Tamara
    Makowski, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (11):
  • [23] Parameterization-induced uncertainties and impacts of crop management harmonization in a global gridded crop model ensemble
    Folberth, Christian
    Elliott, Joshua
    Mueller, Christoph
    Balkovic, Juraj
    Chryssanthacopoulos, James
    Izaurralde, Roberto C.
    Jones, Curtis D.
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Reddy, Ashwan
    Schmid, Erwin
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Yang, Hong
    Arneth, Almut
    Ciais, Philippe
    Deryng, Delphine
    Lawrence, Peter J.
    Olin, Stefan
    Pugh, Thomas A. M.
    Ruane, Alex C.
    Wang, Xuhui
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):
  • [24] GLOBAL CROP CONDITION ASSESSMENT
    HICKMAN, JR
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1983, 73 (11) : 1597 - 1600
  • [25] The Global Assessment of Oilseed Brassica Crop Species Yield, Yield Stability and the Underlying Genetics
    Zandberg, Jaco D.
    Fernandez, Cassandria T.
    Danilevicz, Monica F.
    Thomas, William J. W.
    Edwards, David
    Batley, Jacqueline
    PLANTS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (20):
  • [26] Reply: Ranking crop yield models
    Norwood, F. Bailey
    Roberts, Matthew C.
    Lusk, Jayson L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (04) : 1111 - 1112
  • [27] Ranking crop yield models:: A comment
    Ramirez, Octavio A.
    McDonald, Tanya
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 88 (04) : 1105 - 1110
  • [28] MAXIMUM WORLD CROP PRODUCTION .7. CROP YIELD ASSESSMENT
    GRAINGER, J
    WORLD CROPS, 1982, 34 (01): : 34 - 37
  • [29] Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications
    Mueller, Christoph
    Elliott, Joshua
    Chryssanthacopoulos, James
    Arneth, Almut
    Balkovic, Juraj
    Ciais, Philippe
    Deryng, Delphine
    Folberth, Christian
    Glotter, Michael
    Hoek, Steven
    Iizumi, Toshichika
    Izaurralde, Roberto C.
    Jones, Curtis
    Khabarov, Nikolay
    Lawrence, Peter
    Liu, Wenfeng
    Olin, Stefan
    Pugh, Thomas A. M.
    Ray, Deepak K.
    Reddy, Ashwan
    Rosenzweig, Cynthia
    Ruane, Alex C.
    Sakurai, Gen
    Schmid, Erwin
    Skalsky, Rastislav
    Song, Carol X.
    Wang, Xuhui
    de Wit, Allard
    Yang, Hong
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 10 (04) : 1403 - 1422
  • [30] The Global Gridded Crop Model Intercomparison phase 1 simulation dataset
    Christoph Müller
    Joshua Elliott
    David Kelly
    Almut Arneth
    Juraj Balkovic
    Philippe Ciais
    Delphine Deryng
    Christian Folberth
    Steven Hoek
    Roberto C. Izaurralde
    Curtis D. Jones
    Nikolay Khabarov
    Peter Lawrence
    Wenfeng Liu
    Stefan Olin
    Thomas A. M. Pugh
    Ashwan Reddy
    Cynthia Rosenzweig
    Alex C. Ruane
    Gen Sakurai
    Erwin Schmid
    Rastislav Skalsky
    Xuhui Wang
    Allard de Wit
    Hong Yang
    Scientific Data, 6