Expanding the politics of measurement in sustainable finance: Reconceptualizing environmental, social and governance information as infrastructure

被引:2
作者
Dimmelmeier, Andreas [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Stat, Ludwigstr 33, D-80539 Munich, Germany
关键词
Environmental; social; and governance; sustainable finance; infrastructure; socially responsible investment; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT; MARKETS; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/23996544231209149
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The integration of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) considerations into investment processes, often termed "sustainable finance," has gained significant traction in the global financial system. Yet, despite its growing significance there remains widespread ambiguity about what sustainable finance refers to. Macro-political oriented studies from different disciplines have traced the evolution of sustainable finance and related it to broader financial and political dynamics like financialization or the rise of private environmental governance. By foregrounding these elements, they have, however, tended to paint a too monolithic picture of sustainable finance and related it to abstract discussions such as whether it is controlled by public or private actors. Micro-political accounts, inspired by Science and Technology Studies, have, by contrast, focused on the nuances and contingencies of amongst other metrics, accounting standards or green bond classification frameworks that make the connection of finance and sustainability possible. While these treatments have provided rich accounts of these technical devices, they de-emphasize the connections and evolutionary dynamics of their objects of study. This article aims to bridge macro- and micro-political treatments of sustainable finance by (re-)conceptualizing the evolution of the field in terms of an emerging and expanding infrastructure of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) information. Drawing from secondary literature, interviews, and participant observation data, it provides a three-staged history of sustainable finance from the perspective of the technical devices making up ESG information. It, thereby, offers a comprehensive view that goes beyond attributing sustainable finance to macro-level trends or isolated micro-level occurrences.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 781
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] What Makes Tourists Use Public Transport? Value-Belief-Norm Theory, Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors, and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Kim, Myung Ja
    Hall, C. Michael
    Chung, Namho
    Kim, Minseong
    Sohn, Kwonsang
    JOURNAL OF TRAVEL RESEARCH, 2024, 63 (06) : 1426 - 1441
  • [22] Environmental, Social, and Governance Committees and Information Technology Outcomes
    Haislip, Jacob Z.
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2025, 39 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [23] EU financial regulations and social impact measurement practices: A comprehensive framework on finance for sustainable development
    Bengo, Irene
    Boni, Leonardo
    Sancino, Alessandro
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (04) : 809 - 819
  • [24] How to Design More Sustainable Financial Systems: The Roles of Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in the Decision-Making Process
    Ziolo, Magdalena
    Filipiak, Beata Zofia
    Bak, Iwona
    Cheba, Katarzyna
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [25] The impacts of China's sustainable financing policy on environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) performance
    Li, Haoyu
    Gao, Xing
    Zhang, Xingman
    Zhai, Keyu
    Ling, Yantao
    Cao, Mengqiu
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2025,
  • [26] Public-Private Partnerships for Environmental, Social, and Governance Projects: How Private Funding for Infrastructure Can Produce Mutual Benefits for Companies and the Public
    Chao, Amanda
    Farrier, Joel
    LEVERAGING SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR RESILIENT COMMUNITIES, 2022, : 102 - 113
  • [27] Banking in sustainability: an integrated MCDM framework for evaluating the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) sustainable banking performance
    Karki, Uttam
    Kumar, Ashwani
    Sharma, Dheeraj
    GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE MEMORY AND COMMUNICATION, 2025,
  • [28] Can environmental, social, and governance rating agencies favor business models that promote a more sustainable development?
    Jesus Munoz-Torres, Maria
    Angeles Fernandez-Izquierdo, Maria
    Rivera-Lirio, Juana M.
    Escrig-Olmedo, Elena
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 26 (02) : 439 - 452
  • [29] Environmental, Social, Governance scores and the Missing pillar-Why does missing information matter?
    Sahin, Oezge
    Bax, Karoline
    Czado, Claudia
    Paterlini, Sandra
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (05) : 1782 - 1798
  • [30] Toward sustainable corporate behavior: The effect of the critical mass of female directors on environmental, social, and governance disclosure
    De Masi, Sara
    Slomka-Golebiowska, Agnieszka
    Becagli, Claudio
    Paci, Andrea
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (04) : 1865 - 1878