Effects of telemonitoring follow-up, side effects, and other factors on CPAP adherence

Study Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the effect of telemonitoring compared with standard clinic visits on adherence to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment after 6 months. In addition, the impact of other factors including CPAP side effects on treatment adherence were assessed.Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 217) who were prescribed CPAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea were randomized to either telemonitoring or standard-care follow-up. All patients were followed up 6 months after treatment started. Clinical/anthropometric variables, socioeconomical and lifestyle factors, psychological distress, daily function, and personality traits along with CPAP side effects were assessed. Differences between groups were analyzed using 2-sample t-test, chi-square test, or Fisher's exact test. Regression modeling was used to explore associations between dependent and independent variables. Results: There were no differences in CPAP adherence between telemonitoring and standard-care groups after 6 months (53.2% vs 48.7%; P = .54). CPAP side effects such as dry throat (odds ratio = 2.17; 95% confidence interval = 1.25-3.70), increased awakenings (2.50; 1.31-4.76), and exhaling problems (3.70; 1.25-10.1) were independently associated with low CPAP adherence, although these associations were weakened when adding smoking to the model. No other baseline or follow-up factors were associated with CPAP adherence at 6 months.Conclusions: We could not show that telemonitoring follow-up improved adherence levels. Dry throat, increased awakenings, exhaling problems, and smoking had negative effects on CPAP adherence. Preventing side effects and assessing smoking status is therefore of importance when wanting to improve CPAP adherence.