EARLY PREDICTION OF UNEXPECTED LATENT SHOCK IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT USING VITAL SIGNS

被引:2
作者
Chang, Hansol [1 ,2 ]
Jung, Weon [3 ]
Ha, Juhyung [4 ]
Yu, Jae Yong [5 ]
Heo, Sejin [1 ,2 ]
Lee, Gun Tak [1 ]
Park, Jong Eun [1 ]
Lee, Se Uk [1 ]
Hwang, Sung Yeon [1 ]
Yoon, Hee [1 ]
Cha, Won Chul [1 ,2 ,3 ,6 ]
Shin, Tae Gun [1 ]
Kim, Taerim [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Adv Inst Hlth Sci & Technol, Dept Digital Hlth, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Samsung Med Ctr, Res Inst Future Med, Smart Hlth Lab, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Indiana Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Bloomington, IN USA
[5] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Syst Informat, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Samsung Med Ctr, Digital Innovat Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
来源
SHOCK | 2023年 / 60卷 / 03期
关键词
Shock; clinical decision support system; emergency department; artificial intelligence; SEPSIS; TRIAGE; METAANALYSIS; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1097/SHK.0000000000002181
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective/Introduction: Sequential vital-sign information and trends in vital signs are useful for predicting changes in patient state. This study aims to predict latent shock by observing sequential changes in patient vital signs. Methods: The dataset for this retrospective study contained a total of 93,194 emergency department (ED) visits from January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV-ED data. We further divided the data into training and validation datasets by random sampling without replacement at a 7:3 ratio. We carried out external validation with MIMIC-IV-ED. Our prediction model included logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF) classifier, a multilayer perceptron (MLP), and a recurrent neural network (RNN). To analyze the model performance, we used area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Results: Data of 89,250 visits of patients who met prespecified criteria were used to develop a latent-shock prediction model. Data of 142,250 patient visits from MIMIC-IV-ED satisfying the same inclusion criteria were used for external validation of the prediction model. The AUROC values of prediction for latent shock were 0.822, 0.841, 0.852, and 0.830 with RNN, MLP, RF, and LR methods, respectively, at 3 h before latent shock. This is higher than the shock index or adjusted shock index. Conclusion: We developed a latent shock prediction model based on 24 h of vital-sign sequence that changed with time and predicted the results by individual.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 378
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] The impact of senior doctor assessment at triage on emergency department performance measures: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies
    Abdulwahid, Maysam Ali
    Booth, Andrew
    Kuczawski, Maxine
    Mason, Suzanne M.
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2016, 33 (07) : 504 - +
  • [2] The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review
    Brekke, Idar Johan
    Puntervoll, Lars Haland
    Pedersen, Peter Bank
    Kellett, John
    Brabrand, Mikkel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (01):
  • [3] Hemorrhagic Shock
    Cannon, Jeremy W.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (04) : 370 - 379
  • [4] Artificial intelligence decision points in an emergency department
    Chang, Hansol
    Cha, Won Chul
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 9 (03): : 165 - 168
  • [5] ROLE OF SYMPATHETIC NERVOUS SYSTEM IN HEMORRHAGE
    CHIEN, S
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1967, 47 (02) : 214 - +
  • [6] Machine Learning Methods for Septic Shock Prediction
    Darwiche, Aiman
    Mukherjee, Sumitra
    [J]. AIVR 2018: 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND VIRTUAL REALITY, 2018, : 104 - 110
  • [7] Clinical Decision Support Systems for Triage in the Emergency Department using Intelligent Systems: a Review
    Fernandes, Marta
    Vieira, Susana M.
    Leite, Francisca
    Palos, Carlos
    Finkelstein, Stan
    Sousa, Joao M. C.
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2020, 102
  • [8] Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Fleuren, Lucas M.
    Klausch, Thomas L. T.
    Zwager, Charlotte L.
    Schoonmade, Linda J.
    Guo, Tingjie
    Roggeveen, Luca F.
    Swart, Eleonora L.
    Girbes, Armand R. J.
    Thoral, Patrick
    Ercole, Ari
    Hoogendoorn, Mark
    Elbers, Paul W. G.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (03) : 383 - 400
  • [9] A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice*
    Giannini, Heather M.
    Ginestra, Jennifer C.
    Chivers, Corey
    Draugelis, Michael
    Hanish, Asaf
    Schweickert, William D.
    Fuchs, Barry D.
    Meadows, Laurie
    Lynch, Michael
    Donnelly, Patrick J.
    Pavan, Kimberly
    Fishman, Neil O.
    Hanson, C. William, III
    Umscheid, Craig A.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47 (11) : 1485 - 1492
  • [10] PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet - Components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals
    Goldberger, AL
    Amaral, LAN
    Glass, L
    Hausdorff, JM
    Ivanov, PC
    Mark, RG
    Mietus, JE
    Moody, GB
    Peng, CK
    Stanley, HE
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (23) : E215 - E220