Impact of the EU carbon border adjustment mechanism on economic growth and resources supply in the BASIC countries

被引:18
作者
Gu, Rongrong [1 ]
Guo, Ji [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Yuxiang [3 ]
Wu, Xianhua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Climate & Meteorol Disaster, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
[3] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Business, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM); Economic growth; Geopolitical risk; Differentiated carbon tax; Global trade analysis project (GTAP); TARIFFS; POLICY; TRADE; EMISSIONS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104034
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global climate changes draw a consensus to accelerate the energy transition and reduce CO2 emissions. To cope with this, we need to tackle, among others, three challenges: how will the EU's Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) affect other countries' economies and product supply? Does it pose a geopolitical risk to carbon-dependent emerging economies? Can China design and implement a carbon tariff? However, few systematic quantitative studies have been conducted to answer the above two questions. This paper employs the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) and designs policy scenarios according to the target and the sectors covered by the tariff, to explore the economic effects of the EU's carbon tariff policy on China, India, Brazil and South Africa (hereinafter referred to as the "BASIC countries"), and the feasibility of the BASIC countries to adopt active emission reduction strategies under the differentiated carbon tax policy to cope with the threat of EU carbon tariffs. Besides, this paper also examines the possibility of China to impose a carbon tariff so as to reduce CO2 emissions. The research results show that: carbon tariffs have a negative impact on the economic development, residents' welfare, trade level and output of energy-intensive industries of the expropriated country; active emission reduction is more conducive to stimulating a green transformation of domestic industries than a passive carbon tariff; especially, as a largest developing country, when China takes active emission reductions and imposes carbon tariffs, its impact on the loss of world social welfare is small and world GDP growth occurs. This paper has enriched the relevant literature on carbon tax policy research, and the empirical results can provide references for countries around the world to carry out carbon reduction and formulate carbon tax policies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Trade in 'virtual carbon': Empirical results and implications for policy
    Atkinson, Giles
    Hamilton, Kirk
    Ruta, Giovanni
    Van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2011, 21 (02): : 563 - 574
  • [2] Targeted carbon tariffs: Export response, leakage and welfare
    Boehringer, Christoph
    Bye, Brita
    Faehn, Taran
    Rosendahl, Knut Einar
    [J]. RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2017, 50 : 51 - 73
  • [3] Trade in Carbon and Carbon Tariffs
    Bohringer, Christoph
    Schneider, Jan
    Asane-Otoo, Emmanuel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2021, 78 (04) : 669 - 708
  • [5] Macroanalysis of the economic and environmental impacts of a 2005-2025 European Union bioenergy policy using the GTAP model and life cycle assessment
    Dandres, Thomas
    Gaudreault, Caroline
    Tirado-Seco, Pablo
    Samson, Rejean
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (02) : 1180 - 1192
  • [6] Joint non-OPEC carbon taxes and the transfer of OPEC monopoly rents
    Dong, Yan
    Whalley, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLICY MODELING, 2012, 34 (01) : 49 - 63
  • [7] French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies
    Douenne, Thomas
    Fabre, Adrien
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 169
  • [8] Carbon Tariffs: Effects in Settings with Technology Choice and Foreign Production Cost Advantage
    Drake, David F.
    [J]. M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2018, 20 (04) : 667 - 686
  • [9] Development of the electricity-environmental policy CGE model (GTAP-E-PowerS): A case of the carbon tax in South Africa
    Duy Nong
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 140
  • [10] The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model
    Fang, Yuan
    Yu, Yugang
    Shi, Ye
    Liu, Jie
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2020, 133