Assessing Macro-economic Effects of Climate Impacts on Energy Demand in EU Sub-national Regions

被引:0
作者
Standardi, Gabriele [1 ,2 ]
Dasgupta, Shouro [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Parrado, Ramiro [1 ,2 ]
De Cian, Enrica [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Bosello, Francesco [1 ,2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ca Foscari, CMCC CaFoscari Ctr Euro Mediterraneo Cambiamenti C, Via Liberta 12, I-30175 Venice, Italy
[2] RFF CMCC European Inst Econ & Environm EIEE, Via Liberta 12, I-30175 Venice, Italy
[3] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci LSE, Grantham Res Inst Climate Change & Environm, London, England
[4] CaFoscari Univ Venice, Dept Econ, Cannaregio 873, I-30121 Venice, Italy
[5] CaFoscari Univ Venice, Dept Environm Sci Informat & Stat, Via Torino 155, I-30172 Venice, Italy
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Macro-economic impacts of climate change; Energy demand; CGE models; Sub-national regions; Europe; WATER; NEXUS;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-023-00792-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
European policy makers are increasingly interested in higher spatial representations of future macro-economic consequences from climate-induced shifts in the energy demand. Indeed, EU sub-national level analyses are currently missing in the literature. In this paper, we conduct a macro-economic assessment of the climate change impacts on energy demand at the EU sub-national level by considering twelve types of energy demand impacts, which refer to three carriers (petroleum, gas, and electricity) and four sectors (agriculture, industry, services, and residential). These impacts have been estimated using climatic data at a high spatial resolution across nine Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) and Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) combinations. The impacts feed into a Computable General Equilibrium model, whose regional coverage has been extended to the sub-national NUTS2 and NUTS1 level. Results show that negative macroeconomic effects are not negligible in regions located in Southern Europe mainly driven by increased energy demand for cooling. By 2070, we find negative effects larger than 1% of GDP, especially in SSP5-RCP8.5 and SSP3-RCP4.5 with a maximum of - 7.5% in Cyprus. Regarding regional differences, we identify economic patterns of winners and losers between Northern and Southern Europe. Contrasting scenario combinations, we find that mitigation reduces adverse macro-economic effects for Europe up to a factor of ten in 2070, from 0.4% GDP loss in SSP5-RCP8.5 to 0.04% in SSP2-RCP2.6.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 201
页数:29
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Impacts and adaptation to climate change in European economies [J].
Aaheim, Asbjorn ;
Amundsen, Helene ;
Dokken, Therese ;
Wei, Taoyuan .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2012, 22 (04) :959-968
[2]   Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle [J].
Anderson, JE ;
van Wincoop, E .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (01) :170-192
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 46 FEEM
[4]  
[Anonymous], In-Depth Analysis in Support of the COM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Data and statistics
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Economic Accounts for Agriculture
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Redrawing the energy -climate map
[8]  
ARMINGTON PS, 1969, INT MONET FUND S PAP, V16, P159
[9]  
Bacharach M, 1970, BIPROPORTIONAL MATRI
[10]   Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach [J].
Bazilian, Morgan ;
Rogner, Holger ;
Howells, Mark ;
Hermann, Sebastian ;
Arent, Douglas ;
Gielen, Doff ;
Steduto, Pasquale ;
Mueller, Alexander ;
Komor, Paul ;
Tol, Richard S. J. ;
Yumkella, Kandeh K. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (12) :7896-7906