Social R&D: Does academic freedom contribute to improved societal outcomes?

被引:3
作者
Posso, Alberto [1 ]
Zhang, Quanda [2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Ctr Int Dev, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Federat Univ Australia, Inst Innovat Sci & Sustainabil, Mt Helen, Vic 3350, Australia
关键词
Academic freedom; Humanities; Inequality; Governance; Social R& Panel Data; TRIPLE-HELIX; INEQUALITY; DETERMINANTS; POLICY; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2023.101030
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The economics literature views R&D as an important conduit for growth because it generates new ideas that can be translated into technological innovations. Some of this R&D occurs in universities, mak-ing academic freedom an important part of this process. This literature ignores the potential role that academic research in the social sciences plays toward achieving non-commercial societal outcomes. We bridge this gap by proposing that academia generates social R&D. We posit that greater degrees of aca-demic freedom allow for social R&D to flourish and be transformed into policies that improve societal conditions. We test our hypothesis by studying the relationship between academic freedom and inequal-ity using panel data of 132 countries over the 1967-2018 period. We measure academic freedom using an index developed by the V-Dem Institute. Our econometric analysis suggests that an increase in the index is associated with a decrease in inequality. We employ instrumental variable and interactive fixed effects techniques to try to lend support to the causal relationship between academic freedom and in-equality. We argue that this negative relationship can be explained by academia, predominantly the social sciences, exerting pressure on governments to enact policies that redistribute wealth. We find evidence in support of this mechanism using data from other sources.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [11] Time-varying income elasticities of healthcare expenditure for the OECD and Eurozone
    Casas, Isabel
    Gao, Jiti
    Peng, Bin
    Xie, Shangyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 36 (03) : 328 - 345
  • [12] Can public subsidy on education necessarily improve wage inequality?
    Chaudhuri, Sarbajit
    Ghosh, Arnab
    Banerjee, Dibyendu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2018, 54 : 165 - 177
  • [13] Christiansen C.O., 2019, Histories of Global Inequality, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-19163-4_1
  • [14] Effects of Patent Policy on Income and Consumption Inequality in a R&D Growth Model
    Chu, Angus C.
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 77 (02) : 336 - 350
  • [15] Transport infrastructure and house prices in the long run
    Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi
    Baako, Kingsley Tetteh
    Mintah, Kwabena
    Zhang, Quanda
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2021, 112 : 1 - 12
  • [16] R&D intensity and income inequality in the G7: 1870-2016
    Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi
    Peng, Bin
    Smyth, Russell
    Zhang, Quanda
    [J]. SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 69 (03) : 263 - 282
  • [17] Wealth inequality and intergenerational links
    De Nardi, M
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2004, 71 (03) : 743 - 768
  • [18] The Case for a Progressive Tax: From Basic Research to Policy Recommendations
    Diamond, Peter
    Saez, Emmanuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2011, 25 (04) : 165 - 190
  • [19] Constitutional rules as determinants of social infrastructure
    Eicher, Theo S.
    Garcia-Penalosa, Cecilia
    Kuenzel, David J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MACROECONOMICS, 2018, 57 : 182 - 209
  • [20] Intergenerational inequality: A sociological perspective
    Erikson, R
    Goldthorpe, JH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2002, 16 (03) : 31 - 44