Social R&D: Does academic freedom contribute to improved societal outcomes?

被引:3
作者
Posso, Alberto [1 ]
Zhang, Quanda [2 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Ctr Int Dev, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Federat Univ Australia, Inst Innovat Sci & Sustainabil, Mt Helen, Vic 3350, Australia
关键词
Academic freedom; Humanities; Inequality; Governance; Social R& Panel Data; TRIPLE-HELIX; INEQUALITY; DETERMINANTS; POLICY; PANELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.infoecopol.2023.101030
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The economics literature views R&D as an important conduit for growth because it generates new ideas that can be translated into technological innovations. Some of this R&D occurs in universities, mak-ing academic freedom an important part of this process. This literature ignores the potential role that academic research in the social sciences plays toward achieving non-commercial societal outcomes. We bridge this gap by proposing that academia generates social R&D. We posit that greater degrees of aca-demic freedom allow for social R&D to flourish and be transformed into policies that improve societal conditions. We test our hypothesis by studying the relationship between academic freedom and inequal-ity using panel data of 132 countries over the 1967-2018 period. We measure academic freedom using an index developed by the V-Dem Institute. Our econometric analysis suggests that an increase in the index is associated with a decrease in inequality. We employ instrumental variable and interactive fixed effects techniques to try to lend support to the causal relationship between academic freedom and in-equality. We argue that this negative relationship can be explained by academia, predominantly the social sciences, exerting pressure on governments to enact policies that redistribute wealth. We find evidence in support of this mechanism using data from other sources.(c) 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] University-government collaboration for the generation and commercialization of new knowledge for use in industry
    Abbas, Asad
    Avdic, Anders
    Peng Xiaobao
    Hasan, M. Mahmudul
    Ming, Wan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2019, 4 (01): : 23 - 31
  • [2] Academic freedom, private-sector focus, and the process of innovation
    Aghion, Philippe
    Dewatripont, Mathias
    Stein, Jeremy C.
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2008, 39 (03) : 617 - 635
  • [3] Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
  • [4] What has economics to say about racial discrimination?
    Arrow, KJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 12 (02) : 91 - 100
  • [5] Democracy and Entrepreneurship
    Audretsch, David B.
    Moog, Petra
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 46 (02) : 368 - 392
  • [6] PANEL DATA MODELS WITH INTERACTIVE FIXED EFFECTS
    Bai, Jushan
    [J]. ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (04) : 1229 - 1279
  • [7] Panel cointegration with global stochastic trends
    Bai, Jushan
    Kao, Chihwa
    Ng, Serena
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2009, 149 (01) : 82 - 99
  • [8] Berggren N., 2021, IFN WORKING PAPER, V1405, P1
  • [9] Political institutions and academic freedom: evidence from across the world
    Berggren, Niclas
    Bjornskov, Christian
    [J]. PUBLIC CHOICE, 2022, 190 (1-2) : 205 - 228
  • [10] Bok D.C., 2021, IVORY TOWER IVORY TO