Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcomes in Medically and Surgically Failed or Nonsurgical Candidates with Medically Failed Prolactinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Yagnik, Karan J. J. [1 ]
Erickson, Dana [2 ]
Bancos, Irina [2 ]
Choby, Garret [3 ]
Laack, Nadia [4 ]
Van Gompel, Jamie J. J. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Endocrinol Metab & Nutr, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiat Oncol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
stereotactic radiosurgery; prolactinoma; gamma knife; surgically failed prolactinoma; dopamine resistance; dopamine intolerance; cavernous sinus invasion; SRS; peri-SRS DA stop; GAMMA-KNIFE RADIOSURGERY; PITUITARY-ADENOMAS; DOPAMINE AGONISTS; RADIATION-THERAPY; CAVERNOUS SINUS; CRANIAL NERVES; RADIOTHERAPY; HYPOPITUITARISM; RISK; HYPERPROLACTINEMIA;
D O I
10.1055/a-1934-9028
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Prolactinomas are treated with dopamine agonists (DAs) as first-line therapy and transsphenoidal surgery as an alternative approach for medically failed tumors. We sought to summarize the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the medically and surgically failed prolactinomas as well as in nonsurgical candidates with medically failed prolactinomas by systematic review and meta-analysis. Method A literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guideline. Results A total of 11 articles (total N = 709) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-three percent of patients were able to achieve endocrine remission at a mean follow-up of 54.2 +/- 42.2 months with no association between stopping DA and endocrine remission. Sixty-two percent of patients were able to achieve endocrine control with DA therapy and 34% of patients were able to decrease the dose of DA dose when compared with pre-SRS DA dose at the end of the follow-up period. However, 54% of patients required DA at the end of the follow-up to control hyperprolactinemia. Ninety percent of patients were able to achieve radiologic control at the end of the follow-up in comparison to pre-SRS imagings. Furthermore, 26% of patients newly developed hypopituitarism (one or more pituitary hormones) post-SRS throughout the followup period. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates SRS as an effective adjunct therapy in medically failed nonsurgical candidates or surgically and medically recalcitrant prolactinomas with a 33% chance of achieving endocrine remission, 62% of patients achieved hormonal control with DA and GKRS (gamma knife radio-surgery), with a 34% chance of decreasing DA dose and 90% chance of achieving radiologic control.
引用
收藏
页码:538 / 547
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Surgical outcomes of medically failed prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yagnik, Karan J.
    Erickson, Dana
    Bancos, Irina
    Atkinson, John L. D.
    Choby, Garret
    Peris-Celda, Maria
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    PITUITARY, 2021, 24 (06) : 978 - 988
  • [2] Surgical outcomes of medically failed prolactinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Karan J. Yagnik
    Dana Erickson
    Irina Bancos
    John L. D. Atkinson
    Garret Choby
    Maria Peris-Celda
    Jamie J. Van Gompel
    Pituitary, 2021, 24 : 978 - 988
  • [3] Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: an international systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Singh, Raj
    Didwania, Prabhanjan
    Lehrer, Eric J.
    Sheehan, Darrah
    Sheehan, Kimball
    Trifiletti, Daniel M.
    Sheehan, Jason P.
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 148 (03) : 401 - 418
  • [4] Stereotactic Radiosurgery versus Neuroablative Techniques for Medically Refractory Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Outcomes
    Akkara, Yash
    Singh, Jolene Marie
    Thorne, Lewis
    Hill, Ciaran Scott
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2025,
  • [5] Outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery for large vestibular schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tosi, Umberto
    Lavieri, Miguel E. Tusa
    An, Anjile
    Maayan, Omri
    Guadix, Sergio W.
    DeRosa, Antonio P.
    Christos, Paul J.
    Pannullo, Susan
    Stieg, Philip E.
    Brandmaier, Andrew
    Knisely, Jonathan P. S.
    Ramakrishna, Rohan
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2021, 8 (04) : 405 - 416
  • [6] Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy Versus Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Medically Intractable Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Seizure Outcomes and Complications
    Grewal, Sanjeet S.
    Alvi, Mohammed Ali
    Lu, Victor M.
    Wahood, Waseem
    Worrell, Gregory A.
    Tatum, William
    Wharen, Robert E., Jr.
    Van Gompel, Jamie J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E32 - E47
  • [7] First treatment and retreatment of medically refractive trigeminal neuralgia by stereotactic radiosurgery versus microvascular decompression: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Lu, Victor M.
    Duvall, Julia B.
    Phan, Kevin
    Jonker, Benjamin P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 32 (04) : 355 - 364
  • [8] Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Intracranial Breast Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Almeida, Neil D.
    Kuo, Cathleen
    Schrand, Tyler V.
    Rupp, Julia
    Madhugiri, Venkatesh S.
    Goulenko, Victor
    Shekher, Rohil
    Shah, Chirag
    Prasad, Dheerendra
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (20)
  • [9] Stereotactic radiosurgery versus stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of intracranial meningiomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fatima, Nida
    Meola, Antonio
    Pollom, Erqi L.
    Soltys, Scott G.
    Chang, Steven D.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 46 (06) : 1 - 11
  • [10] Stereotactic radiosurgery for acromegaly: an international systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes
    Raj Singh
    Prabhanjan Didwania
    Eric J. Lehrer
    Darrah Sheehan
    Kimball Sheehan
    Daniel M. Trifiletti
    Jason P. Sheehan
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2020, 148 : 401 - 418