EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MODELS OF INCENTIVE LEGAL REGIMES OF ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY IN THE SPHERE OF DIGITAL INNOVATIONS AND TECHNOLOGIES

被引:0
作者
Gromova, Elizaveta A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] South Ural State Univ, Natl Res Univ, Law Inst, 78 Lenina Pr, Chelyabinsk 454092, Russia
[2] South Ural State Univ, Natl Res Univ, Dept Entrepreneurial Competit & Environm Law, 78 Lenina Pr, Chelyabinsk 454092, Russia
来源
PRAVOPRIMENENIE-LAW ENFORCEMENT REVIEW | 2023年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
Legal regime; incentives; evaluation; efficiency; digital; innovations; digital technologies; SCHUMPETERIAN COMPETITION;
D O I
10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(4).66-75
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Subject. The article explores the issues of assessing the effectiveness of models of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies. Purpose. The purpose of the study was to develop approaches to determining the effectiveness of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the field of digital innovation and technology, as well as to develop criteria and methods for evaluating existing models of these legal regimes. Methodology. The methodological basis of this study are general scientific methods (analysis and synthesis, induction and deduction), private scientific methods (interpretation of legal acts), as well as content analysis, study of reports and analytical references of governmental organizations. Results. The general approaches to assessing the effectiveness of law and legislation existing both in Russia and abroad are analyzed. The author defines the types of effectiveness of incentive legal regimes of entrepreneurial activity in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies, as well as their criteria. The author's methodology for assessing the effectiveness of incentive legal regimes in the sphere of digital innovations and technologies is proposed. Conclusions. The methodology proposed in this study for assessing the effectiveness of such legal regimes can be used as part of the actual impact assessment, and the conclusions reached by the authors may form the basis for further future research on legal regimes for entrepreneurial activity.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 75
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Audretsch D.B., 1990, SMALL BUS ECON, V2, P119
  • [2] Bakulina L.T., 2009, Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences, P9
  • [3] Begishev I.R., 2022, International Journal of Law in Changing World, V1, P73, DOI [10.54934/ijlcw.v1i2.33, DOI 10.54934/IJLCW.V1I2.33]
  • [4] Belyaev M.A., 2018, Otsenka pravovykh rezhimov: podkhody i metody, Collection of scientific papers, P42
  • [5] Belyaeva G.S., 2013, Doct. Diss. Thesis
  • [6] [БОГОЛЮБОВ Сергей Александрович BOGOLYUBOV S.A.], 2018, [Журнал российского права, Journal of Russian Law, Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava], P16, DOI 10.12737/art_2018_5_2
  • [7] Chervonyuk V.I., 2008, Theory of state and law, Textbook
  • [8] Technological regimes and catching up in the product space
    Desmarchelier, Benoit
    Regis, Paulo Jose
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2021, 30 (04) : 927 - 947
  • [9] Which innovation regime for public service innovation networks for social innovation (PSINSIs)? Lessons from a European cases database
    Desmarchelier, Benoit
    Djellal, Faridah
    Gallouj, Faiz
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2021, 50 (09)
  • [10] Efremov A.A., 2020, Experimental legal regimes: foreign experience and Russian start