Unveiling Stars: How Graphical Displays of Online Consumer Ratings Affect Consumer Perception and Judgment

被引:11
作者
Mousavi, Javad [1 ]
Singh, Surendra N. [2 ]
Chatterjee, Promothesh [3 ]
Masters, Tamara [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Sam M Walton Coll Business, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Sch Business, Lawrence, KS USA
[3] Univ Utah, David Eccles Sch Business, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
online consumer reviews; rating distribution; graphical displays; perception; bar graphs; DEPTH CUES; MODEL; DECISION; REVIEWS; CHOICE; FORMAT;
D O I
10.1177/00222437231179186
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prior research has indicated that consumers' decisions are significantly influenced by online reviews. However, existing research has focused mainly on attributes (e.g., average ratings) that are not fully controlled by firms; only limited research has investigated how controllable attributes (e.g., review display formats) affect consumers. Drawing on visual perception research, the authors examine the effectiveness of two prominent graphical display formats used by major e-commerce platforms: one that displays rating distributions in a proportional format (e.g., Amazon) and one that does so in a simple format (e.g., Google). The results indicate that due to the changes in graphs' reference points caused by the shrunken x-axis in simple bar graphs, consumers respond more positively to an item when its rating distribution is displayed in a graphically simple (vs. proportional) format. This effect is moderated by the distribution's peak value (i.e., the share of the most frequent rating) and imbalance score (i.e., the difference between the share of positive and negative ratings). Furthermore, even an item's future ratings are influenced by the graphical format in which its prior ratings are displayed. The contributions to the marketing literature are discussed, and insights that can aid managers in making more informed decisions are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 247
页数:23
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, LOCAL CONSUMER REV S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, UX Research: 5 Requirements for the 'Ratings Distribution Summary' on the Product Page (65% Get It Wrong)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2022, 102 Restaurant Software Statistics You Can't Ignore: 2022 Data, Analysis, Market Share
[4]   Some insights on visual and verbal processing strategies [J].
Bagozzi, Richard P. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 18 (04) :258-263
[5]   EFFECTS OF INFORMATION PRESENTATION FORMAT ON CONSUMER INFORMATION ACQUISITION STRATEGIES [J].
BETTMAN, JR ;
KAKKAR, P .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1977, 3 (04) :233-240
[6]   Constructive consumer choice processes [J].
Bettman, JR ;
Luce, MF ;
Payne, JW .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1998, 25 (03) :187-217
[7]   A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension [J].
Carpenter, PA ;
Shah, P .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-APPLIED, 1998, 4 (02) :75-100
[8]   Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth [J].
Chen, Zoey ;
Lurie, Nicholas H. .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2013, 50 (04) :463-476
[9]   The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews [J].
Chevalier, Judith A. ;
Mayzlin, Dina .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2006, 43 (03) :345-354
[10]   MEASUREMENT OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN VISUAL VERSUS VERBAL INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
CHILDERS, TL ;
HOUSTON, MJ ;
HECKLER, SE .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1985, 12 (02) :125-134