In-Clinic versus Hybrid Cancer Rehabilitation Service Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Outcome Comparison Study

被引:1
|
作者
Wood, Kelley C. [1 ]
Giri, Smith [2 ]
Kendig, Tiffany D. [1 ]
Pergolotti, Mackenzi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Select Med, ReVital Canc Rehabil, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Inst Canc Outcomes & Survivorship, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Occupat Therapy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
telerehabilitation; quality of life; outpatients; patient-reported outcome measures; neoplasms; cancer survivors; health care quality; access and evaluation; rehabilitation; physical therapy specialty; occupational therapy; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; OLDER-ADULTS; TELEREHABILITATION; TELEMEDICINE;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol30100644
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Diminished health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is common among cancer survivors but often amendable to rehabilitation. However, few access real-world rehabilitation services. Hybrid delivery modes (using a combination of in-clinic and synchronous telehealth visits) became popular during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer a promising solution to improve access beyond the pandemic. However, it is unclear if hybrid delivery has the same impact on patient-reported outcomes and experiences as standard, in-clinic-only delivery. To fill this gap, we performed a retrospective, observational, comparative outcomes study of real-world electronic medical record (EMR) data collected by a national outpatient rehabilitation provider in 2020-2021. Of the cases meeting the inclusion criteria (N = 2611), 60 were seen to via hybrid delivery. The outcomes evaluated pre and post-rehabilitation included PROMIS (R) global physical health (GPH), global mental health (GMH), physical function (PF), and the ability to participate in social roles and activities (SRA). The patient experience outcomes included the Net Promoter Survey (NPS (R)) and the Select Medical Patient-Reported Experience Measure (SM-PREM). A linear and logistic regression was used to examine the between-group differences in the PROMIS and SM-PREM scores while controlling for covariates. The hybrid and in-clinic-only cases improved similarly in all PROMIS outcomes (all p < 0.05). The association between the delivery mode and the likelihood of achieving the minimal important change in the PROMIS outcomes was non-significant (all p > 0.05). No between-group differences were observed in the NPS or SM-PREM scores (all p > 0.05). Although more research is needed, this real-world evidence suggests that hybrid rehabilitation care may be equally beneficial for and acceptable to cancer survivors and supports calls to expand access to and reimbursement for telerehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:8916 / 8927
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of Telerehabilitation Versus In-Clinic Rehabilitation Delivery on Self-Efficacy in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
    Helm, Erin E.
    Crowley, Brenda
    Crowell, Tara L.
    Galantino, Mary Lou
    REHABILITATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (02) : 82 - 88
  • [32] Quality of Life of Patients With Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Baffert, Kim-Arthur
    Darbas, Tiffany
    Lebrun-Ly, Valerie
    Pestre-Munier, Julia
    Peyramaure, Clementine
    Descours, Clementine
    Mondoly, Melanie
    Latrouite, Simon
    Bignon, Elisa
    Nicouleau, Samantha
    Geyl, Sophie
    Leobon, Sophie
    Deluche, Elise
    IN VIVO, 2021, 35 (01): : 663 - 670
  • [33] Delivery of Remote Pulmonary Rehabilitation: COVID-19 Service Evaluation in England
    Ellis, James
    Gilworth, Gill
    Morgan, Toby
    Harris, Katherine
    King, Natalie
    White, Patrick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2025, 20 : 533 - 538
  • [34] Provision of rehabilitation and assistive technology services in a low resource setting during the COVID-19 pandemic and introduction of telehealth: service users' and providers' perspectives
    Ghosh, Ritu
    Healy, Aoife
    Prabhune, Akash
    Mallavaram, Aishwarya
    Raju, Sama
    Chockalingam, Nachiappan
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 36 (06) : 405 - 411
  • [35] Telehealth for consultation and shoulder rehabilitation: a preliminary study on the perspectives of 30 patients during the COVID-19 lockdown
    Sahu, Dipit
    Rathod, Vaibhavi
    Phadnis, Ashish
    Bansal, Samarjit S.
    CLINICS IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW, 2021, 24 (03): : 156 - 165
  • [36] The Role of Acute Rehabilitation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Study in the Czech Republic
    Guran, Zdenek
    Pastucha, Dalibor
    Snehotova, Zuzana
    Honzikova, Lucie
    Mad'ar, Rastislav
    Tomaskova, Hana
    LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [37] Hybrid Telehealth Medical Retina Clinic Due to Provider Exposure and Quarantine During COVID-19 Pandemic
    Aweidah, Hamzah
    Safadi, Khaled
    Jotkowitz, Alan
    Chowers, Itay
    Levy, Jaime
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 3421 - 3426
  • [38] A virtual teaching clinic for virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Xin He
    Daniel Shelden
    Andrew Kraftson
    Tobias Else
    Richard J. Auchus
    Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology, 6 (1):
  • [39] Telemedicine and the Interdisciplinary Clinic Model: During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond
    Zughni, Lisa A.
    Gillespie, Amanda I.
    Hatcher, Jeanne L.
    Rubin, Adam D.
    Giliberto, John Paul
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 163 (04) : 673 - 675
  • [40] Telemedicine experiences at a pediatric endocrinology clinic during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Denkboy Ongen, Yasemin
    Eren, Erdal
    Sahin, Kadriye Cansu
    Buhur Pirimoglu, Meltem
    Saglam, Halil
    Tarim, Omer
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 191 (03) : 985 - 990