In-Clinic versus Hybrid Cancer Rehabilitation Service Delivery during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Outcome Comparison Study

被引:1
|
作者
Wood, Kelley C. [1 ]
Giri, Smith [2 ]
Kendig, Tiffany D. [1 ]
Pergolotti, Mackenzi [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Select Med, ReVital Canc Rehabil, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 USA
[2] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Inst Canc Outcomes & Survivorship, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
[3] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Occupat Therapy, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
telerehabilitation; quality of life; outpatients; patient-reported outcome measures; neoplasms; cancer survivors; health care quality; access and evaluation; rehabilitation; physical therapy specialty; occupational therapy; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES; OLDER-ADULTS; TELEREHABILITATION; TELEMEDICINE;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol30100644
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Diminished health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is common among cancer survivors but often amendable to rehabilitation. However, few access real-world rehabilitation services. Hybrid delivery modes (using a combination of in-clinic and synchronous telehealth visits) became popular during the COVID-19 pandemic and offer a promising solution to improve access beyond the pandemic. However, it is unclear if hybrid delivery has the same impact on patient-reported outcomes and experiences as standard, in-clinic-only delivery. To fill this gap, we performed a retrospective, observational, comparative outcomes study of real-world electronic medical record (EMR) data collected by a national outpatient rehabilitation provider in 2020-2021. Of the cases meeting the inclusion criteria (N = 2611), 60 were seen to via hybrid delivery. The outcomes evaluated pre and post-rehabilitation included PROMIS (R) global physical health (GPH), global mental health (GMH), physical function (PF), and the ability to participate in social roles and activities (SRA). The patient experience outcomes included the Net Promoter Survey (NPS (R)) and the Select Medical Patient-Reported Experience Measure (SM-PREM). A linear and logistic regression was used to examine the between-group differences in the PROMIS and SM-PREM scores while controlling for covariates. The hybrid and in-clinic-only cases improved similarly in all PROMIS outcomes (all p < 0.05). The association between the delivery mode and the likelihood of achieving the minimal important change in the PROMIS outcomes was non-significant (all p > 0.05). No between-group differences were observed in the NPS or SM-PREM scores (all p > 0.05). Although more research is needed, this real-world evidence suggests that hybrid rehabilitation care may be equally beneficial for and acceptable to cancer survivors and supports calls to expand access to and reimbursement for telerehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:8916 / 8927
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Delivering Virtual Cancer Rehabilitation Programming During the First 90 Days of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multimethod Study
    Lopez, Christian J.
    Edwards, Beth
    Langelier, David M.
    Chang, Eugene K.
    Chafranskaia, Aleksandra
    Jones, Jennifer M.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2021, 102 (07): : 1283 - 1293
  • [2] Patients’ preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    I. Mozes
    D. Mossinson
    H. Schilder
    D. Dvir
    O. Baron-Epel
    A. Heymann
    BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [3] Patients' preferences for telemedicine versus in-clinic consultation in primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Mozes, I
    Mossinson, D.
    Schilder, H.
    Dvir, D.
    Baron-Epel, O.
    Heymann, A.
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [4] Moving from the clinic to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic - a pilot clinical trial comparing in-clinic rehabilitation versus telerehabilitation for persisting symptoms following a mild Traumatic brain injury
    Langevin, Pierre
    Fremont, Pierre
    Fait, Philippe
    Dube, Marc-Olivier
    Roy, Jean-Sebastien
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (13) : 2880 - 2889
  • [5] Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Pandemic: An Indian Perspective
    Uppal, Harleen
    Rai, Siddharth
    DISASTER MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS, 2022, 16 (01) : 409 - 412
  • [6] Telerehabilitation During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Outpatient Rehabilitation Settings: A Descriptive Study
    Werneke, Mark W.
    Deutscher, Daniel
    Grigsby, David
    Tucker, Carole A.
    Mioduski, Jerome E.
    Hayes, Deanna
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2021, 101 (07):
  • [7] Inpatient Virtual Vision Clinic Improves Access to Vision Rehabilitation Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Keilty, Matthew
    Houston, Kevin E.
    Collins, Caroline
    Trehan, Ritika
    Chen, Ya-Ting
    Merabet, Lotfi
    Watts, Amy
    Pundlik, Shrinivas
    Luo, Gang
    ARCHIVES OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND CLINICAL TRANSLATION, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [8] EFFECT OF TRADITIONAL REHABILITATION PROGRAMME VERSUS TELEREHABILITATION IN ADOLESCENTS WITH IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC: A COHORT STUDY
    Andrade, Rodrigo Mantelatto
    Santana, Bruna Gomes
    Schmidt, Ariane Verttu
    Barsotti, Carlos Eduardo
    Baroni, Marina Pegoraro
    Saragiotto, Bruno Tirotti
    Ribeiro, Ana Paula
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2024, 56
  • [9] A Process Evaluation of Intervention Delivery for a Cancer Survivorship Rehabilitation Clinical Trial Conducted during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Stevens, Courtney J.
    Wechsler, Stephen
    Ejem, Deborah B.
    Khalidi, Sarah
    Coffee-Dunning, Jazmine
    Morency, Jamme L.
    Thorp, Karen E.
    Codini, Megan E.
    Newman, Robin M.
    Echols, Jennifer
    Cloyd, Danielle Z.
    dos Anjos, Sarah
    Muse, Colleen
    Gallups, Sarah
    Goedeken, Susan C.
    Flannery, Kaitlin
    Bakitas, Marie A.
    Hegel, Mark T.
    Lyons, Kathleen Doyle
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2023, 30 (10) : 9141 - 9155
  • [10] Telemedicine in secondary prevention and rehabilitation of stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Chang, Maria de la P.
    Davancens, Agustina
    Rourich, Maria C.
    Vincenti, Juan M.
    Valencia, Priscila
    Guarriello, Maria F.
    Costilla, Cesar M.
    Estol, Conrado J.
    MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRES, 2021, 81 (03) : 415 - 420