The relative effectiveness of different grassland restoration methods: A systematic literature search and meta-analysis

被引:17
作者
Slodowicz, Daniel [1 ]
Durbecq, Aure [2 ,3 ]
Ladouceur, Emma [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Eschen, Rene [7 ]
Humbert, Jean-Yves [1 ]
Arlettaz, Raphael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Ecol & Evolut, Div Conservat Biol, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Aix Marseille Univ, Avignon Univ, Mediterranean Inst Biodivers & Ecol IMBE, CNRS,IRD, Avignon, France
[3] Environm Consultancy Eco Med, Marseille, France
[4] German Ctr Integrat Biodivers Res iDiv, Leipzig, Germany
[5] Univ Leipzig, Inst Biol, Leipzig, Germany
[6] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Physiol Divers, Leipzig, Germany
[7] CABI, Delemont, Switzerland
来源
ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
active restoration; literature review; mesic grasslands; plants; seed addition; soil disturbance; temperate Europe; EX-ARABLE LAND; LANDSCAPE CONTEXT; CENTRAL-EUROPE; MANAGEMENT; SEED; DISPERSAL; CONSERVATION; PRODUCTIVITY; SUCCESSION; VEGETATION;
D O I
10.1002/2688-8319.12221
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Active grassland restoration has gained importance in mitigating the dramatic decline of farmnland biodiversity. While there is evidence that such operations are generally effective in promoting plant diversity, little is known about the effectiveness of the different methods applied. Restoration methods can differ in intensity of seed bed preparation, seed source and method of seed application.In this systematic literature search and meta-analysis, we screened the literature for studies of the restoration of mesic grasslands in temperate Europe. We focused on active restoration experiments that included a treatment and lasted for more than 3 years. We evaluated the influence of restoration factors on plant species richness relative to non-restored controls.We found 187 articles that investigated the outcome of operations aimed at actively restoring mesic temperate grasslands. Most articles focused on plants, with only 9.6% dealing with other organisms (e.g. beetles, pollinating insects). Many papers had to be excluded due to incomplete data, too short study duration and/or lack of an adequate control. This resulted in 13 articles fulfilling our criteria for inclusion, yielding a total of 56 data points for the meta-analysis.Restoration actions increased plant species richness by, on average, 17.4%, compared to controls. The seed source explained a significant amount of variation in plant species richness: seeds originating from a speciose donor grassland had a positive effect. This effect was even enhanced when combined with a commercial seed mix, whereas commercial seed mixes alone had no significant effect. We did not observe any effect of other factors, such as the type of seed bed preparation or the seed application method.A seed-source obtained from species-rich grasslands seems to be key to efficient grassland restoration in mesic grasslands of temperate Europe. Even though seeds from a speciose donor grassland should be preferred over commercial seeds, associating natural and commercial seed mixes increases plant species richness. This systematic literature search further revealed two major research gaps in grassland restoration ecology: a deficit in long-term investigations as well as a deficit in studies focusing on non-plant organisms.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Grassland restoration on ex-arable land by transfer of brush-harvested propagules and green hay [J].
Albert, Agnes-Julia ;
Mudrak, Ondrej ;
Jongepierova, Ivana ;
Fajmon, Karel ;
Frei, Ivana ;
Sevcikova, Magdalena ;
Klimesova, Jitka ;
Dolezal, Jiri .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 272 :74-82
[2]   Fitting three-level meta-analytic models in R: A step-by-step tutorial [J].
Assink, Mark ;
Wibbelink, Carlijn J. M. .
QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 12 (03) :154-174
[3]   "Active" and "passive" ecological restoration strategies in meta-analysis [J].
Atkinson, Joe ;
Bonser, Stephen P. .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2020, 28 (05) :1032-1035
[4]   Nature will have its way: local vegetation trumps restoration treatments in semi-natural grassland [J].
Auestad, Inger ;
Austad, Ingvild ;
Rydgren, Knut .
APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2015, 18 (02) :190-196
[5]   Enhancing success in grassland restoration by adding regionally propagated target species [J].
Baasch, Annett ;
Engst, Karina ;
Schmiede, Ralf ;
May, Konstanze ;
Tischew, Sabine .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 94 :583-591
[6]   Succession of floodplain grasslands following reduction in land use intensity: the importance of environmental conditions, management and dispersal [J].
Bischoff, Armin ;
Warthemann, Guido ;
Klotz, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2009, 46 (01) :241-249
[7]   Hay and seed transfer to re-establish rare grassland species and communities: How important are date and soil preparation? [J].
Bischoff, Armin ;
Hoboy, Sandy ;
Winter, Nadja ;
Warthemann, Guido .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2018, 221 :182-189
[8]  
Blair J., 2014, Ecology and the Environment, P389, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-7501-914, 10.1007/978-1-4614-7501-9]
[9]   Species transfer via topsoil translocation: lessons from two large Mediterranean restoration projects [J].
Buisson, Elise ;
Jaunatre, Renaud ;
Roemermann, Christine ;
Bulot, Adeline ;
Dutoit, Thierry .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 :S179-S188
[10]   The effect of management practices on bumblebee densities in hedgerow and grassland habitats [J].
Byrne, Fiach ;
delBarco-Trillo, Javier .
BASIC AND APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2019, 35 :28-33