A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in an Academic Optometry Clinic

被引:3
|
作者
Kemchoknatee, Parinee [1 ]
Sunlakaviset, Pornlada [1 ]
Khieokhoen, Nattawat [1 ]
Srisombut, Thansit [1 ]
Tangon, Duanghathai [1 ]
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Rajavithi Hosp, Ophthalmol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
spherical equivalent; cylindrical power; spherical power; refraction; subjective refraction; autorefraction; autorefractor; REPEATABILITY; ERRORS; YOUNG;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.37448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Refractive error is the most common cause of decreased visual acuity. Refractive measurement in adults consists of cycloplegic (objective) and manifest (subjective) refraction. Although the effectiveness of autorefraction is a crucial factor, there needs to be more information on its accuracy and precision on each autorefractor compared with subjective measurement in Thai patients.Objective: To compare the accuracy and precision of the two autorefractors' findings in Rajavithi Hospital, OptoChek Plus, and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000, with each other and with those of the subjective method.Materials & Methods: An observational study was conducted at the Ophthalmology clinic in Rajavithi Hospital from March 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All subjects were tested using the two autorefractors (OptoChek Plus and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000) and subjective refraction. One eye per subject was included in the study.Results: Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The difference between spherical powers obtained by OptoChek and subjective refraction was not significantly different; however, there was a significant difference between those calculated by Tomey and the subjective method (p=0.77, p=0.04 respectively). The variations between cylindrical powers arrived at by the two autorefraction techniques and those calculated by the subjective method were significantly different (OptoChek and Tomey p-=0.01, p-value<0.001, respectively). In addition, 95% of the limit of agreement (95% of LOA) was low in the cylindrical measurement of each autorefractor compared with subjective refraction. (84.61%, 86.36%, respectively). No statistically significant difference between the spherical equivalent calculated by the two autorefractors and that of subjective refraction was observed in the present study (OptoChek: p-value=0.26 and Tomey: p-value=0.77).Conclusions: There was a clinically significant difference between the cylindrical power calculated by the two autorefractors and those obtained from subjective refraction. Patients with high astigmatism should be monitored closely when measured by autorefractors, as there can be a slightly lower agreement between objective and subjective refraction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Comparison between Subjective Refraction and Aberrometry-Derived Refraction in Keratoconus Patients and Control Subjects
    Jinabhai, Amit
    O'Donnell, Clare
    Radhakrishnan, Hema
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2010, 35 (08) : 703 - 714
  • [22] Comparison of Cycloplegic refraction between Retinoscopy, Closed field and Open field autorefraction in Pseudomyopia
    Huaindeen, Jameel Rizwana
    Ramani, Krishna Kumar
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [23] Diagnostic accuracy and variability of autorefraction by the Tracey Visual Function Analyzer and the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001 in relation to subjective refraction
    Cleary, G.
    Spalton, D. J.
    Patel, P. M.
    Lin, P. -F.
    Marshall, J.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2009, 29 (02) : 173 - 181
  • [24] Influence of isofocal intraocular lenses on objective refraction based on autorefraction and aberrometry
    Perez-Sanz, Lidia
    Charbel, Carla
    Poyales, Francisco
    Garzon, Nuria
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 261 (10) : 2863 - 2872
  • [25] Comparison of the VISX wavescan and OPD-scan III with the subjective refraction
    Zhu, R.
    Long, K. -L.
    Wu, X. -M.
    Li, Q. -D.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (14) : 2988 - 2992
  • [26] Comparison of Self-service Refractor with Auto-refraction and Subjective Refraction
    Zhen, Yi
    Shen, Jing
    Hao, Jie
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2014, 55 (13)
  • [27] Comparison of refractive error measurements in adults with Z-View aberrometer, Humphrey autorefractor, and subjective refraction
    Cooper, Jeffrey
    Citek, Karl
    Feldman, Jerome M.
    OPTOMETRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 2011, 82 (04) : 231 - 240
  • [28] Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults:comparison of the double-pass system,retinoscopy,subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor
    Meritxell Vilaseca
    Montserrat Arjona
    Jaume Pujol
    Elvira Peris
    Vanessa Martìnez
    International Journal of Ophthalmology, 2013, 6 (05) : 618 - 625
  • [29] Non-cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction in adults:, comparison of the double-pass system, retinoscopy, subjective refraction and a table-mounted autorefractor
    Vilaseca, Meritxell
    Arjona, Montserrat
    Pujol, Jaume
    Peris, Elvira
    Martinez, Vanessa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2013, 6 (05) : 618 - 625
  • [30] Comparisons of objective and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia using binocular wavefront optometer with autorefraction and retinoscopy in school-age children
    Yadi Lei
    Xun Chen
    Mingrui Cheng
    Boliang Li
    Yinjie Jiang
    Yilin Xu
    Xiaoying Wang
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2023, 261 : 1465 - 1472