A Comparison of Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in an Academic Optometry Clinic

被引:3
|
作者
Kemchoknatee, Parinee [1 ]
Sunlakaviset, Pornlada [1 ]
Khieokhoen, Nattawat [1 ]
Srisombut, Thansit [1 ]
Tangon, Duanghathai [1 ]
机构
[1] Rangsit Univ, Rajavithi Hosp, Ophthalmol, Bangkok, Thailand
关键词
spherical equivalent; cylindrical power; spherical power; refraction; subjective refraction; autorefraction; autorefractor; REPEATABILITY; ERRORS; YOUNG;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.37448
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Refractive error is the most common cause of decreased visual acuity. Refractive measurement in adults consists of cycloplegic (objective) and manifest (subjective) refraction. Although the effectiveness of autorefraction is a crucial factor, there needs to be more information on its accuracy and precision on each autorefractor compared with subjective measurement in Thai patients.Objective: To compare the accuracy and precision of the two autorefractors' findings in Rajavithi Hospital, OptoChek Plus, and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000, with each other and with those of the subjective method.Materials & Methods: An observational study was conducted at the Ophthalmology clinic in Rajavithi Hospital from March 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. All subjects were tested using the two autorefractors (OptoChek Plus and TOMEY Auto Refractometer RC-5000) and subjective refraction. One eye per subject was included in the study.Results: Forty-eight patients (48 eyes) were enrolled in the study. The difference between spherical powers obtained by OptoChek and subjective refraction was not significantly different; however, there was a significant difference between those calculated by Tomey and the subjective method (p=0.77, p=0.04 respectively). The variations between cylindrical powers arrived at by the two autorefraction techniques and those calculated by the subjective method were significantly different (OptoChek and Tomey p-=0.01, p-value<0.001, respectively). In addition, 95% of the limit of agreement (95% of LOA) was low in the cylindrical measurement of each autorefractor compared with subjective refraction. (84.61%, 86.36%, respectively). No statistically significant difference between the spherical equivalent calculated by the two autorefractors and that of subjective refraction was observed in the present study (OptoChek: p-value=0.26 and Tomey: p-value=0.77).Conclusions: There was a clinically significant difference between the cylindrical power calculated by the two autorefractors and those obtained from subjective refraction. Patients with high astigmatism should be monitored closely when measured by autorefractors, as there can be a slightly lower agreement between objective and subjective refraction.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Self-Test Refraction , Autorefraction, and Subjective Refraction
    Kos, Abraao Ferreira de Sousa Neto
    Moscovici, Bernardo Kaplan
    Vilar, Cesar
    Chaves, Mario Augusto Pereira Dias
    Da Silva, Maira Gomes Barbosa
    Neuwald, Mauricio Agne
    De Medeiros, Andre Lins
    Lake, Jonathan Clive
    Motta, Antonio Francisco Pimenta
    Tzelikis, Patrick Frensel de Moraes
    Carricondo, Pedro Carlos
    Gouvea, Larissa
    Nose, Walton
    Hida, Wilson Takashi
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 19 : 1085 - 1092
  • [2] The precision of wavefront refraction compared to subjective refraction and autorefraction
    Pesudovs, Konrad
    Parker, Katrina E.
    Cheng, Han
    Applegate, Raymond A.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2007, 84 (05) : 387 - 392
  • [3] Autorefraction versus subjective refraction in high astigmatism
    Kangari, Haleh
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Rahmani, Saeed
    Ahmadian, Elnaz
    Yekta, Abbasali
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2025, 18 (03) : 504 - 509
  • [4] Comparisons of wavefront refraction, autorefraction, and subjective manifest refraction
    Lin, Hong-Zin
    Chen, Chien-Chung
    Lee, Yuan-Chieh
    TZU CHI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 25 (01): : 43 - 46
  • [5] Excess of autorefraction over subjective refraction: Dependence on age
    Joubert, L
    Harris, WF
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 1997, 74 (06) : 439 - 444
  • [6] Agreement of wavefront-based refraction, dry and cycloplegic autorefraction with subjective refraction
    Bamdad, Shahram
    Momeni-Moghaddam, Hamed
    Abdolahian, Milad
    Pinero, David P.
    JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY, 2022, 15 (01) : 100 - 106
  • [7] Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes
    Al-Tuwairqi, Waleed S.
    Ogbuehi, Kelechi C.
    Razzouk, Haya
    Alanazi, Mana A.
    Osuagwu, Uchechukwu L.
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 43 (02): : 116 - 122
  • [8] Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    Asharlous, Amir
    Soroush, Sara
    Yekta, AbbasAli
    Dadbin, Nooshin
    Fotouhi, Akbar
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 100 (08) : 1122 - 1127
  • [9] A Comparison of a Traditional and Wavefront Autorefraction
    Lebow, Kenneth A.
    Campbell, Charles E.
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2014, 91 (10) : 1191 - 1198
  • [10] Agreement and variability of subjective refraction, autorefraction, and wavefront aberrometry in pseudophakic patients
    Ruiss, Manuel
    Findl, Oliver
    Draschl, Petra
    Harrer-Seely, Annette
    Hirnschall, Nino
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 47 (08) : 1056 - 1063