Carcass and meat quality traits in Brangus steers

被引:3
作者
Rodriguez, Eduardo E. [1 ]
Hamblen, Heather [1 ]
Flowers, Sara [1 ]
Leal, Joel D. [2 ]
Carr, Chad [1 ]
Scheffler, Tracy [1 ]
Mateescu, Raluca G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Anim Sci, Gainesville, FL 32608 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, San Diego, CA 92093 USA
关键词
Brangus; marbling; quality grade; tenderness; Warner; Bratzler shear force; LONGISSIMUS MUSCLE; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; PHENOTYPIC CORRELATIONS; BEEF PALATABILITY; MARBLING SCORE; TENDERNESS; HERITABILITIES;
D O I
10.1093/tas/txad021
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The quality grade system used in the United States to identify carcasses with superior eating satisfaction to consumers is based on the amount of marbling within the ribeye and the maturity of the carcass. However, the most important quality attribute for consumers is tenderness. The objective of this study was to investigate the phenotypic correlations between carcass and meat quality traits of strip loin steaks from Brangus steers, particularly the relation between the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) quality grade and tenderness. Warner-Bratzler shear force (WBSF) values in this study averaged 5.10 +/- 0.96 kg, slightly higher than the national average of 4.55 +/- 1.14 kg. Average WBSF across all quality grades ranged from 4.90 to 5.27 kg with standard deviations ranging from 0.78 to 1.40 kg. In the present Brangus steer population, there was a weak negative (-0.13) but favorable correlation (P < 0.05) between marbling score and tenderness measured through WBSF. The USDA quality grade had a significant (P = 0.02) effect on WBSF. The WBSF least square means were significantly higher in the Select compared with the Choice(-), and Choice(o) quality grades. The Choice(+) and Prime quality grades were not significantly different from any quality grades regarding the WBSF. The standard quality grade did not have significantly different WBSF least square means from any other quality grade. The range of WBSF values was large, especially in the lower quality grade categories, indicating that there is considerable variation in tenderness, even within quality grade. The high level of variation in tenderness within USDA quality grades highlights the limitation of the USDA grading system to predict eating quality or tenderness. Lay Summary The quality grade system used in the United States to identify carcasses with superior eating satisfaction to consumers is based on the amount of marbling within the ribeye and the maturity of the carcass. However, the most important meat quality attribute for consumers is tenderness. In the present study, tenderness varied considerably within quality grade, especially in the lower quality grade categories. Consequently, the United States Department of Agriculture quality grade system, which is intended to predict consumer satisfaction and palatability, may not be an accurate predictor of tenderness or consumer satisfaction. Inaccurate estimation of tenderness can lead to dissatisfied consumers, which could lead to nonrepeat customers and decreased beef demand, negatively impacting all sectors of the beef industry. Improving tenderness through traditional selection is difficult because tenderness has weak to no correlation with easily measured carcass and meat quality traits and collection of tenderness data on a routine basis is difficult and expensive. Genomic selection seems to be the most feasible approach to make significant genetic improvement.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Aberle E.D., 2001, PRINCIPLES MEAT SCI, V4th
  • [2] AMS USDA, 2017, US STAND GRAD CARC B
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, STANDARD TEST METHOD, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1520/C0469, 10.1520/C0595, DOI 10.1520/D6026-13]
  • [4] Belk K., 2015, Research Guidelines for Cookery, Sensory Evaluation, and Instrumental Tenderness Measurements of Meat
  • [5] National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Survey of carcass characteristics through instrument grading assessments
    Boykin, C. A.
    Eastwood, L. C.
    Harris, M. K.
    Hale, D. S.
    Kerth, C. R.
    Griffin, D. B.
    Arnold, A. N.
    Hasty, J. D.
    Belk, K. E.
    Woerner, D. R.
    Delmore, R. J., Jr.
    Martin, J. N.
    VanOverbeke, D. L.
    Mafi, G. G.
    Pfeiffer, M. M.
    Lawrence, T. E.
    McEvers, T. J.
    Schmidt, T. B.
    Maddock, R. J.
    Johnson, D. D.
    Carr, C. C.
    Scheffler, J. M.
    Pringle, T. D.
    Stelzleni, A. M.
    Gottlieb, J.
    Savell, J. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2017, 95 (07) : 3003 - 3011
  • [6] PREDICTIVE VALUE OF USDA BEEF QUALITY GRADE FACTORS FOR COOKED MEAT PALATABILITY
    CAMPION, DR
    CROUSE, JD
    DIKEMAN, ME
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1975, 40 (06) : 1225 - 1228
  • [7] MEAT SCIENCE AND MUSCLE BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: Manipulating mesenchymal progenitor cell differentiation to optimize performance and carcass value of beef cattle
    Du, M.
    Huang, Y.
    Das, A. K.
    Yang, Q.
    Duarte, M. S.
    Dodson, M. V.
    Zhu, M. -J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (03) : 1419 - 1427
  • [8] Effectiveness of USDA instrument-based marbling measurements for categorizing beef carcasses according to differences in longissimus muscle sensory attributes
    Emerson, M. R.
    Woerner, D. R.
    Belk, K. E.
    Tatum, J. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (02) : 1024 - 1034
  • [9] Sensory quality of meat from eight different types of cattle in relation with their biochemical characteristics
    Gagaoua, M.
    Terlouw, E. M. C.
    Micol, D.
    Hocquette, J-F
    Moloney, A. P.
    Nuernberg, K.
    Bauchart, D.
    Boudjellal, A.
    Scollan, N. D.
    Richardson, R. I.
    Picard, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE AGRICULTURE, 2016, 15 (07) : 1550 - 1563
  • [10] Estimation of relationships between mineral concentration and fatty acid composition of longissimus muscle and beef palatability traits
    Garmyn, A. J.
    Hilton, G. G.
    Mateescu, R. G.
    Morgan, J. B.
    Reecy, J. M.
    Tait, R. G., Jr.
    Beitz, D. C.
    Duan, Q.
    Schoonmaker, J. P.
    Mayes, M. S.
    Drewnoski, M. E.
    Liu, Q.
    VanOverbeke, D. L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (09) : 2849 - 2858