Comparison between the Sofia SARS Antigen FIA Test and the PCR Test in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

被引:4
作者
Cernila, Manca [1 ,4 ]
Logar, Mateja [2 ]
Mozina, Hugon [3 ]
Osredkar, Josko [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Inst Clin Chem & Biochem, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Hosp Hyg, Dept Infect Dis, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Internist First Aid, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Sofia SARS antigen FIA; clinical validity; analytical validity; rapid antigen testing; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1093/labmed/lmac079
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare Quidel's rapid antigen test Sofia SARS antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) (Sofia) with the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test. Methods Two samples were taken from each test subject-1 for testing with the Sofia test and 1 for testing with the rRT-PCR test. In total, swabs were taken from 146 subjects who presented symptoms of infection (group 1) and 672 subjects who were tested regardless of symptoms (group 2). Results In group 1, the sensitivity of the antigen test was 90.0% and its specificity 97.5%. In group 2, however, the sensitivity of the antigen test was 81.4% and the specificity 98.9%. In addition to asymptomatic patients, false-negative results of rapid antigen tests also occurred in subjects with high threshold values (cycle threshold > 30). Conclusion Our results show that the Sofia test meets the standards for diagnostic tests according to the criteria of the World Health Organization, as they show high sensitivity and specificity, and perhaps most importantly, a high negative predictive value (> 95%).
引用
收藏
页码:E44 / E48
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnosis of infection by SARS-COV-2: Is one molecular test enough?
    Mencacci, Antonella
    Vedovati, Maria Cristina
    Camilloni, Barbara
    Cenci, Elio
    Becattini, Cecilia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2021, 87 : 109 - 111
  • [42] Comparison of FTD SARS-CoV-2 Assay and RealStar RT-PCR kit 1.0 for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Di Carlo, Daniele
    Mazzuti, Laura
    Sciandra, Ilaria
    Guerrizio, Giuliana
    Oliveto, Giuseppe
    Cabral, Rodolfo J. Riveros
    Zingaropoli, Maria Antonella
    Turriziani, Ombretta
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2021, 298
  • [43] Comparison of the SARS-CoV-2 BD Veritor Nasal Antigen Test with Nasopharyngeal Reverse Transcription-PCR in Symptomatic Patients
    Koga, Paula
    Maluf, Maira
    Nunes, Fabiane
    Campos, Juliana
    Gazarini, Livia
    Borghoff, Tatiane
    Libanori, Glais
    Martino, Marines
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2022, 10 (05):
  • [44] Evaluation of Sample Pooling for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swab and Saliva Samples with the Idylla SARS-CoV-2 Test
    Hofman, Paul
    Allegra, Maryline
    Salah, Myriam
    Benzaquen, Jonathan
    Tanga, Virginie
    Bordone, Olivier
    Fayada, Julien
    Long-Mira, Elodie
    Lassalle, Sandra
    Lanteri, Elisabeth
    Lespinet-Fabre, Virginie
    Brest, Patrick
    Mograbi, Baharia
    Maniel, Charlotte
    Boutros, Jacques
    Leroy, Sylvie
    Heeke, Simon
    Hofman, Veronique
    Marquette, Charles-Hugo
    Ilie, Marius
    [J]. MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2021, 9 (03):
  • [45] Rapid Antigen Test LumiraDxTM vs. Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Cattelan, Anna Maria
    Sasset, Lolita
    Zabeo, Federico
    Ferrari, Anna
    Rossi, Lucia
    Mazzitelli, Maria
    Cocchio, Silvia
    Baldo, Vincenzo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (07)
  • [46] Evaluation of a Rapid Antigen Test To Detect SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Identify Potentially Infectious Individuals
    Korenkov, Michael
    Poopalasingam, Nareshkumar
    Madler, Matthias
    Vanshylla, Kanika
    Eggeling, Ralf
    Wirtz, Maike
    Fish, Irina
    Dewald, Felix
    Gieselmann, Lutz
    Lehmann, Clara
    Fatkenheuer, Gerd
    Gruell, Henning
    Pfeifer, Nico
    Heger, Eva
    Klein, Florian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (09)
  • [47] Diagnostic Performance of the Rapid Antigen Test as a Screening Tool for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the Emergency Department
    Lee, Heekyung
    Kang, Hyunggoo
    Cho, Yongil
    Oh, Jaehoon
    Lim, Tae-Ho
    Ko, Byuk-Sung
    Lee, Juncheol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [48] Clinical validation of automated and rapid mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test
    Koskinen, Juha M.
    Antikainen, Petri
    Hotakainen, Kristina
    Haveri, Anu
    Ikonen, Niina
    Savolainen-Kopra, Carita
    Sundstrom, Kati
    Koskinen, Janne O.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [49] Evaluation of the AMP SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test in a hospital setting
    Leixner, Georg
    Voill-Glaninger, Astrid
    Bonner, Elisabeth
    Kreil, Anna
    Zadnikar, Rene
    Viveiros, Andre
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 108 : 353 - 356
  • [50] Clinical Utility of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test in the Emergency Department
    Lee, Dong-hyun
    Kim, Jinyeong
    Ryu, Soorack
    Kim, Jieun
    Han, Eunhee
    Choi, Hyuk Joong
    [J]. CLINICAL LABORATORY, 2023, 69 (11) : 2323 - 2332