Comparison between the Sofia SARS Antigen FIA Test and the PCR Test in Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

被引:4
作者
Cernila, Manca [1 ,4 ]
Logar, Mateja [2 ]
Mozina, Hugon [3 ]
Osredkar, Josko [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Inst Clin Chem & Biochem, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Dept Hosp Hyg, Dept Infect Dis, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Med Ctr Ljubljana, Internist First Aid, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Pharm, Ljubljana, Slovenia
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Sofia SARS antigen FIA; clinical validity; analytical validity; rapid antigen testing; SENSITIVITY; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1093/labmed/lmac079
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objective The purpose of this study was to compare Quidel's rapid antigen test Sofia SARS antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) (Sofia) with the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) test. Methods Two samples were taken from each test subject-1 for testing with the Sofia test and 1 for testing with the rRT-PCR test. In total, swabs were taken from 146 subjects who presented symptoms of infection (group 1) and 672 subjects who were tested regardless of symptoms (group 2). Results In group 1, the sensitivity of the antigen test was 90.0% and its specificity 97.5%. In group 2, however, the sensitivity of the antigen test was 81.4% and the specificity 98.9%. In addition to asymptomatic patients, false-negative results of rapid antigen tests also occurred in subjects with high threshold values (cycle threshold > 30). Conclusion Our results show that the Sofia test meets the standards for diagnostic tests according to the criteria of the World Health Organization, as they show high sensitivity and specificity, and perhaps most importantly, a high negative predictive value (> 95%).
引用
收藏
页码:E44 / E48
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of an immunochromatography-based rapid antigen test, Inspecter Kowa® SARS-CoV-2, using saliva specimens for the detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Kodana, Masahiro
    Orihara, Yuta
    Tezuka, Mariko
    Takahashi, Rina
    Noguchi, Sakiko
    Matsuzaki, Nanako
    Takada, Tomohito
    Kobari, Naomi
    Ogane, Kana
    Kawamura, Rieko
    Kawamura, Toru
    Takeuchi, Shinichi
    Kamiyama, Yuki
    Shiomi, Rie
    Aoyagi, Ryutaro
    Saito, Masaya
    Kusano, Takeru
    Nakaya, Nobuaki
    Kaneko, Satoru
    Morita, Hideo
    Uchida, Yoshihito
    Yazawa, Hiroaki
    Sekiya, Ryu
    Katayama, Kazuki
    Mikami, Shingo
    Sato, Tomoya
    Tarumotoj, Norihito
    Kobayashi, Takehito
    Nakamoto, Hidetomo
    Maeda, Takuya
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 29 (06) : 586 - 591
  • [32] Comparison of the Accula SARS-CoV-2 Test with a Laboratory-Developed Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Clinical Nasopharyngeal Specimens
    Hogan, Catherine A.
    Garamani, Natasha
    Lee, Andrew S.
    Tung, Jack K.
    Sahoo, Malaya K.
    Huang, ChunHong
    Stevens, Bryan
    Zehnder, James
    Pinsky, Benjamin A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2020, 58 (08)
  • [33] False-positive for SARS-CoV-2 antigen test in a man with acute HIV infection
    Yamaniha, Kazutaka
    Kinjo, Takeshi
    Akamine, Morikazu
    Setoguchi, Michika
    Tateyama, Masao
    Fujita, Jiro
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2021, 27 (07) : 1112 - 1114
  • [34] Evaluation of the Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal swabs.
    Ben Abdelhanin, Myriam
    Mvumbi, Dieudonne M.
    Agathine, Aurelie
    Nanos, Nikolaos
    Gidenne, Stephane
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY, 2021, 144
  • [35] Evaluating diagnostic accuracy of an RT-PCR test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva
    Samsunder, Natasha
    Sivro, Aida
    Hassan-Moosa, Razia
    Lewis, Lara
    Kara, Zahra
    Baxter, Cheryl
    Karim, Quarraisha Abdool
    Karim, Salim Abdool
    Kharsany, Ayesha B. M.
    Naidoo, Kogieleum
    Ngcapu, Sinaye
    DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [36] Performance Evaluation of the SAMBA II SARS-CoV-2 Test for Point-of-Care Detection of SARS-CoV-2
    Assennato, Sonny M.
    Ritchie, Allyson, V
    Nadala, Cesar
    Goel, Neha
    Tie, Cuijuan
    Nadala, Lourdes M.
    Zhang, Hongyi
    Datir, Rawlings
    Gupta, Ravindra K.
    Curran, Martin D.
    Lee, Helen H.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2021, 59 (01)
  • [37] Comparison of Allplex SARS-CoV-2 Assay, Easy SARS-CoV-2 WE and Lumipulse quantitative SARS-CoV-2 antigen test performance using automated systems for the diagnosis of COVID-19
    Sberna, Giuseppe
    Basile, Flavia
    Guarino, Maria Luisa
    Capobianchi, Maria Rosaria
    Bordi, Licia
    Parisi, Gabriella
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 113 : 113 - 115
  • [38] The Epistemology of a Positive SARS-CoV-2 Test
    Rainer Johannes Klement
    Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay
    Acta Biotheoretica, 2021, 69 : 359 - 375
  • [39] The Epistemology of a Positive SARS-CoV-2 Test
    Klement, Rainer Johannes
    Bandyopadhyay, Prasanta S.
    ACTA BIOTHEORETICA, 2021, 69 (03) : 359 - 375
  • [40] The detection dogs test is more sensitive than real-time PCR in screening for SARS-CoV-2
    Hag-Ali, Mohammed
    AlShamsi, Abdul Salam
    Boeijen, Linda
    Mahmmod, Yasser
    Manzoor, Rashid
    Rutten, Harry
    Mweu, Marshal M.
    El-Tholoth, Mohamed
    AlShamsi, Abdullatif Alteraifi
    COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY, 2021, 4 (01)