Effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass-ionomer restorations to dentin

被引:0
|
作者
Elmenshawy, Marwa Z. [1 ]
El-Haliem, Huda Abed [1 ]
Mowafy, Amr M. [2 ,3 ]
Hamama, Hamdi H. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Conservat Dent Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Bot Dept, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] New Mansoura Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Biol Sci, New Mansoura, Egypt
[4] New Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, New Mansoura, Egypt
[5] Mansoura Univ, Fac Dent, Conservat Dent Dept, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
关键词
Ethanolic extract of propolis; glass ionomer; antibacterial properties; Streptococcus mutans and microshear bond strength; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; CHLORHEXIDINE; CEMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23710
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of ethanolic extract of propolis on antibacterial and microshear bond strength of glass ionomer restorations to dentin. Materials and methods: Conventional glass ionomer cement (Equia forte, GC Tokyo, Japan), resinmodified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC, GC Tokyo, Japan) and propolis powder (dried extract from honey bees) materials were used in this study. Both conventional glass ionomer and resinmodified glass ionomer were modified by two different concentrations of ethanolic extract of propolis (10 % and 25 % EEP). For antibacterial test, Streptococcus mutans strain was spread on agar petri dishes using a sterile swab. Discs of both glass ionomer restorative materials (without adding EEP, with 10 % EEP and with 25 % EEP) were fabricated within the agar plates. Antibacterial activity was evaluated by measuring the inhibition zones around each disc. For microshear bond strength test, 60 healthy human permanent molars were prepared by cutting occlusal surface and expose the dentin at the height of contour of all teeth then conditioned using poly acrylic acid conditioner, both glass ionomer restorative materials (without adding EEP, with 10 % EEP and with 25 % EEP) were mixed and applied on conditioned dentin surface by using tygon tube. Microshear bond strength was evaluated by the universal testing machine. Results: Two-way ANOVA test revealed that both glass ionomer type and different concentrations of EEP had significant effect on the antibacterial test results and microshear bond strength values (p < 0,05). Glass ionomer restorative material with 25%EEP had the highest antibacterial values whereas glass ionomer restorative material without modifications (control groups) had the lowest values. Resin-modified glass ionomer without any modification (control group) had the highest bond strength while resin-modified glass ionomer with 25%EEP had the lowest bond strength. Conclusions: Incorporation of ethanolic extract of propolis to glass ionomer restorative material increases the antibacterial effects of both conventional GIC and RMGI. Inspite of this advantage, it seems that it has deleterious effect on microshear bond strength to dentin.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional Glass Ionomer with 1% Ethanolic Extract of Propolis Incorporated Glass Ionomer Cement -Invitro Study
    Prabhakar, Attiguppe Ramashetty
    Balehosur, Deepti V.
    Basappa, Nadig
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 10 (05) : ZC88 - ZC91
  • [22] Bond strength of light-cured glass-ionomer on dentin with various etchants.
    Terata, R
    Nakashima, K
    Yoshinaka, S
    Kubota, M
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1996, 75 : 1227 - 1227
  • [23] REPAIR BOND STRENGTH OF GLASS-IONOMER RESTORATIVES
    ROBBINS, JW
    COOLEY, RL
    DUKE, ES
    BERRONG, JM
    OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 1989, 14 (03) : 129 - 132
  • [24] TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF A GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT
    LACEFIELD, WR
    REINDL, MC
    RETIEF, DH
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1985, 53 (02): : 194 - 198
  • [25] SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT
    DEMARCO, FF
    PISANESCHI, E
    DIGIROLAMO, JA
    LOPES, PP
    CARVALHO, RCR
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 (03) : 800 - 800
  • [26] Shear bond strength of encapsulated glass-ionomer cements to sound and carious dentin.
    Czarnecka, B.
    Deregowska-Nosowicz, P.
    Limanowska-Shaw, H.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B193 - B193
  • [27] ENAMEL AND DENTIN BOND STRENGTH OF LIGHT-CURED GLASS-IONOMER RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    ATTIN, T
    BUCHALLA, W
    VATASCHKI, M
    KIELBASSA, AM
    HELLWIG, E
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 475 - 475
  • [28] Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Glass Ionomer and Glass Ionomer with Ethanolic Extract of Propolis - An In Vitro Study
    Balehosur, Deepti V.
    Antony, Jasmine Mary
    Sharma, Deeksha
    Divater, Vijayalaxmi
    David, Alan Winston
    Bali, Praveen Kumar
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2024, 16 (SUPPL 5) : S4400 - S4402
  • [29] SHEAR BOND STRENGTHS TO DENTIN OF GLASS-IONOMER RESTORATIVES AND LINERS
    BELL, RB
    BARKMEIER, WW
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 328 - 328
  • [30] Effect of conditioning and 1 year aging on the bond strength and interfacial morphology of glass-ionomer cement bonded to dentin
    Hoshika, Shuhei
    Ting, Shihchun
    Ahmed, Zubaer
    Chen, Fei
    Toida, Yu
    Sakaguchi, Norihito
    Van Meerbeek, Bart
    Sano, Hidehiko
    Sidhu, Sharanbir K.
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2021, 37 (01) : 106 - 112