The effects of different working fluids on the performance characteristics of the Rankine and Brayton cycles

被引:7
作者
Kanberoglu, Berna [1 ]
Ozsari, Ibrahim [2 ]
Dobrucali, Erinc [2 ]
Gonca, Guven [3 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Marine Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Bursa Tech Univ, Maritime Fac, Bursa, Turkiye
[3] Yildiz Tech Univ, Naval Architecture & Marine Engn Dept, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Working fluid; Exergy; ECOP; TOPSIS; ANN; EFECWOD; WASTE HEAT-RECOVERY; SELECTION; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; TURBINE; ORC; PARAMETERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.058
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, 143 different working fluids have been analyzed for Rankine and Brayton cycles in terms of performance characteristics such as power, thermal and exergy efficiency, and EFECWOD. The selection of working fluid is a significant consideration in the design of both these cycles, as it can importantly affect the performance and efficiency of the system. As of late, there has been growing interest in investigating the effects of various working fluids on the performance characteristics of these cycles. This article aims to determine the ten best among different working fluids according to the determined criteria using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution, which is a multi-criteria decision method. In the decision-making process, the importance scale of the analytical hierarchy process was used to determine the weight values of the criteria to be used in the TOPSIS analysis to obtain more accurate results. Artificial Neural Network method is employed to identify the optimal working fluid as well. As a conclusion of this thermodynamic analysis of the performance characteristics for Rankine and Brayton cycles using various working fluids, the Rankine cycle achieved the maximum power of 12,277 kW, the maximum efficiency of 93 %, and the maximum EFECWOD value of 9962 kJ/ m3 with hydrogen, helium, and dimethylcarbonate as the respective working fluids. Furthermore, hydrogen exhibits the highest power output of 2493 kW in the Brayton cycle. Nitrogen demonstrates the highest efficiency at 44 %, while R141b achieves the highest exergy efficiency at 98 %. Lastly, the fluid with the highest EFECWOD value is R13, with a measurement of 4932 kJ/m3.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1074
页数:16
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Fluid selection and thermodynamic optimization of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery applications
    Agromayor, Roberto
    Nord, Lars O.
    [J]. 4TH INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON ORC POWER SYSTEMS, 2017, 129 : 527 - 534
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1981, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
  • [3] SELECTING A WORKING FLUID FOR A RANKINE-CYCLE ENGINE
    BADR, O
    PROBERT, SD
    OCALLAGHAN, PW
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 1985, 21 (01) : 1 - 42
  • [4] A review of working fluid and expander selections for organic Rankine cycle
    Bao, Junjiang
    Zhao, Li
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 24 : 325 - 342
  • [5] Multi-objective optimization of ORC parameters and selection of working fluid using preliminary radial inflow turbine design
    Bekiloglu, Hasan Eren
    Bedir, Hasan
    Anlas, Gunay
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 183 : 833 - 847
  • [6] Boydak O, 2022, J New Result Eng Nat Sci, V17
  • [7] Effect of working fluids in a novel geothermal-based integration of organic-flash and power/cooling generation cycles with hydrogen and freshwater production units
    Cao, Yan
    Dhahad, Hayder A.
    Togun, Hussein
    Hussen, Hasanen M.
    Anqi, Ali E.
    Farouk, Naeim
    Issakhov, Alibek
    Parikhani, Towhid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (56) : 28370 - 28386
  • [8] Fluid selection of Organic, Rankine Cycle for low-temperature waste heat recovery based on thermal optimization
    Cataldo, Filippo
    Mastrullo, Rita
    Mauro, Alfonso William
    Vanoli, Giuseppe Peter
    [J]. ENERGY, 2014, 72 : 159 - 167
  • [9] Chauhan A., 2013, J. Comput. Eng, V2013, P105825, DOI [10.1155/2013/105825, DOI 10.1155/2013/105825]
  • [10] Chowdhury A.S., 2023, Int. J. Thermofluids, V20, P100426, DOI [10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100426, DOI 10.1016/J.IJFT.2023.100426]